Aristotelian Features in Medieval Oneirocriticism

This paper is dedicated to the problem of perception of Greek knowledge in the Middle Ages. It considers how elements of Aristotle’s theories began to appear in texts by European medieval authors on dreams, visions and the occurrence of sleep, the extent to which these elements appeared and in what form. It analyzes the theories of William of Conches (De phil. mundi XXI - XXII), including his glosses on Macrobius’ Commentary on the ‘Dream of Scipio’ and also those of Pseudo-Augustine (De sp. et an. XXV). It is shown that their texts contain a synthesis of different, non-direct Greek ideas about psychology and physiology in which can be seen not only the influence of Platonic and Neoplatonic doctrines but also features of Aristotelian theories. The texts of William and Ps.-Augustine demonstrate a synthesis of Platonism, Neoplatonism and Aristotelianism incorporated into the Christian religion and culture. In creating their oneirocritical concepts, these authors have built an Aristotelian component into the Platonic theories already known to them about dreams and dreaming. This might have prompted later encyclopaedists (17th century) to use more materials drawn from Aristotle, Galen (and also Avicenna) that met the requirements of the Modern Era.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
RussianStudiesHu
Published
2025-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.38210/rustudh.2025.7.g.2
Primary Topic
Medieval and Classical Philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Aristotelian Features in Medieval Oneirocriticism

Maya Petrova
RussianStudiesHu
Medieval and Classical Philosophy
article

Aristotelian Features in Medieval Oneirocriticism

Maya Petrova
article en

Abstract

This paper is dedicated to the problem of perception of Greek knowledge in the Middle Ages. It considers how elements of Aristotle’s theories began to appear in texts by European medieval authors on dreams, visions and the occurrence of sleep, the extent to which these elements appeared and in what form. It analyzes the theories of William of Conches (De phil. mundi XXI - XXII), including his glosses on Macrobius’ Commentary on the ‘Dream of Scipio’ and also those of Pseudo-Augustine (De sp. et an. XXV). It is shown that their texts contain a synthesis of different, non-direct Greek ideas about psychology and physiology in which can be seen not only the influence of Platonic and Neoplatonic doctrines but also features of Aristotelian theories. The texts of William and Ps.-Augustine demonstrate a synthesis of Platonism, Neoplatonism and Aristotelianism incorporated into the Christian religion and culture. In creating their oneirocritical concepts, these authors have built an Aristotelian component into the Platonic theories already known to them about dreams and dreaming. This might have prompted later encyclopaedists (17th century) to use more materials drawn from Aristotle, Galen (and also Avicenna) that met the requirements of the Modern Era.

RussianStudiesHuVol. 7(2)
Institute of World History (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Medieval and Classical Philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.