S2566 Age-Dependent Mortality Impact of Nonselective Beta Blockers in Patients With Decompensated Cirrhosis

Introduction: There is limited data regarding the use of nonselective beta blockers (NSBB) in older adults with decompensated cirrhosis. Methods: Using the TriNetX database, we identified patients with decompensated cirrhosis based on ICD codes. Data were collected from 1/2001 to 6/2024. Patients were categorized into the following groups. Decompensated cirrhosis (30–60 years) + NSBB (carvedilol, nadolol, or propranolol); Decompensated cirrhosis (61–90 years) + NSBB; Decompensated cirrhosis (30–60 years) – NSBB; Decompensated cirrhosis (61–90 years) – NSBB. Outcomes were compared between age-matched and NSBB groups: (30–60 years) + NSBB vs (30–60 years) – NSBB, and (61–90 years) + NSBB vs (61–90 years) – NSBB. Primary outcome was mortality, and secondary outcomes included acute kidney injury (AKI), dyselectrolytemia, emergency room (ER) visits, and urgent care (UC) visits. Outcomes were assessed over 2 years following 1 month of NSBB initiation. A subgroup analysis was performed comparing (81–90 years) + NSBB with (81–90 years) – NSBB. Propensity score matching (1:1) was applied based on demographics, comorbidities, and laboratory values (creatinine, sodium, INR, albumin, and bilirubin). Results: A total of 103,952 patients in the (61–90 years) + NSBB group and 197,942 patients in the (61–90 years) – NSBB group were identified. Following propensity score matching, each cohort included 96,084 patients. Mortality did not significantly differ between the groups. However, patients in the (61–90 years) + NSBB group had higher rates of AKI [OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.36–1.42], hypernatremia [OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.18–1.32], hypokalemia [OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.08–1.15], hyperkalemia [OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.47–1.56], ER visits [OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.25–1.30], and UC visits [OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.31–1.36]. In the subgroup analysis, the (81–90 years) + NSBB cohort had increased mortality compared to the (81–90 years) – NSBB cohort [OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.02–1.18]. Conversely, the (30–60 years) + NSBB cohort demonstrated reduced mortality compared to the (30–60 years) – NSBB cohort [OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.80–0.92], though with increased rates of AKI, hyperkalemia, ER visits, and UC visits. Conclusion: In a propensity-matched analysis, NSBB use in patients aged 30–60 years with decompensated cirrhosis was associated with reduced mortality compared to non-NSBB users. However, no significant mortality difference was observed among older adults (61–90 years). Notably, increased mortality was identified in patients aged 81–90 years on NSBB compared to non-NSBB users.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001137724.04033.1d
Primary Topic
Liver Disease and Transplantation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S2566 Age-Dependent Mortality Impact of Nonselective Beta Blockers in Patients With Decompensated Cirrhosis

Ganesh Aswath, Idan Goren, Abdelkader Chaar, Ahmad Nawaz et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Liver Disease and Transplantation
article

S2566 Age-Dependent Mortality Impact of Nonselective Beta Blockers in Patients With Decompensated Cirrhosis

Ganesh Aswath, Idan Goren, Abdelkader Chaar, Ahmad Nawaz, Savio John, Avneet Kaur
article en

Abstract

Introduction: There is limited data regarding the use of nonselective beta blockers (NSBB) in older adults with decompensated cirrhosis. Methods: Using the TriNetX database, we identified patients with decompensated cirrhosis based on ICD codes. Data were collected from 1/2001 to 6/2024. Patients were categorized into the following groups. Decompensated cirrhosis (30–60 years) + NSBB (carvedilol, nadolol, or propranolol); Decompensated cirrhosis (61–90 years) + NSBB; Decompensated cirrhosis (30–60 years) – NSBB; Decompensated cirrhosis (61–90 years) – NSBB. Outcomes were compared between age-matched and NSBB groups: (30–60 years) + NSBB vs (30–60 years) – NSBB, and (61–90 years) + NSBB vs (61–90 years) – NSBB. Primary outcome was mortality, and secondary outcomes included acute kidney injury (AKI), dyselectrolytemia, emergency room (ER) visits, and urgent care (UC) visits. Outcomes were assessed over 2 years following 1 month of NSBB initiation. A subgroup analysis was performed comparing (81–90 years) + NSBB with (81–90 years) – NSBB. Propensity score matching (1:1) was applied based on demographics, comorbidities, and laboratory values (creatinine, sodium, INR, albumin, and bilirubin). Results: A total of 103,952 patients in the (61–90 years) + NSBB group and 197,942 patients in the (61–90 years) – NSBB group were identified. Following propensity score matching, each cohort included 96,084 patients. Mortality did not significantly differ between the groups. However, patients in the (61–90 years) + NSBB group had higher rates of AKI [OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.36–1.42], hypernatremia [OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.18–1.32], hypokalemia [OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.08–1.15], hyperkalemia [OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.47–1.56], ER visits [OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.25–1.30], and UC visits [OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.31–1.36]. In the subgroup analysis, the (81–90 years) + NSBB cohort had increased mortality compared to the (81–90 years) – NSBB cohort [OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.02–1.18]. Conversely, the (30–60 years) + NSBB cohort demonstrated reduced mortality compared to the (30–60 years) – NSBB cohort [OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.80–0.92], though with increased rates of AKI, hyperkalemia, ER visits, and UC visits. Conclusion: In a propensity-matched analysis, NSBB use in patients aged 30–60 years with decompensated cirrhosis was associated with reduced mortality compared to non-NSBB users. However, no significant mortality difference was observed among older adults (61–90 years). Notably, increased mortality was identified in patients aged 81–90 years on NSBB compared to non-NSBB users.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Liver Disease and Transplantation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.