S2546 SGLT2 Inhibitors in the Management of Cirrhotic Ascites: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Introduction: Refractory ascites remains a major complication of decompensated cirrhosis, with limited effective pharmacologic options. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are emerging as a novel class of agents with natriuretic and osmotic diuretic properties that may benefit patients with cirrhotic ascites. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating SGLT2 inhibitors in adults with decompensated cirrhosis and refractory ascites. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched through January 2025. Eligible studies included RCTs reporting risk ratios (RRs) or hazard ratios (HRs) for ascites-related outcomes. Meta-analyses were performed using fixed- or random-effects models based on heterogeneity. Study quality was assessed using the ROBINS-2 tool. Results: Three RCTs comprising 110 patients met inclusion criteria. Compared to standard therapy, SGLT2 inhibitors significantly reduced the need for large-volume paracentesis (LVP) (HR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.37–0.84, P = 0.005, I² = 0%) and nearly halved the proportion of patients requiring LVP (RR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.33–0.70, P < 0.001). In 2 studies reporting complete ascites resolution, SGLT2 inhibitors were associated with a markedly increased likelihood of ultrasonographic clearance (RR = 9.00, 95% CI: 1.19–68.01, P = 0.03). No significant difference in acute kidney injury (AKI) was observed (RR = 1.98, 95% CI: 0.40–9.81, P = 0.40), though heterogeneity was high (I² = 78%). SGLT2 inhibitor use was associated with increased risks of urinary tract infection (RR = 3.00, 95% CI: 1.34–6.72, P = 0.01) and hyponatremia (RR = 2.80, 95% CI: 1.10–7.10, P = 0.03). Conclusion: SGLT2 inhibitors demonstrate promising efficacy in reducing the need for large-volume paracentesis and achieving ascites resolution in patients with refractory ascites secondary to cirrhosis. However, increased risks of urinary tract infections and hyponatremia warrant cautious patient selection and monitoring. Larger, multicenter trials with longer follow-up are needed to confirm these findings and further assess the safety profile of SGLT2 inhibitors in this population.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001137644.65053.0f
Primary Topic
Liver Disease and Transplantation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S2546 SGLT2 Inhibitors in the Management of Cirrhotic Ascites: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Shreyas Nandyal, Chun‐Wei Pan, Vikram Kotwal, Gedion Yilma Amdetsion et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Liver Disease and Transplantation
article

S2546 SGLT2 Inhibitors in the Management of Cirrhotic Ascites: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Shreyas Nandyal, Chun‐Wei Pan, Vikram Kotwal, Gedion Yilma Amdetsion, Hiwot G. Tebeje
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Refractory ascites remains a major complication of decompensated cirrhosis, with limited effective pharmacologic options. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are emerging as a novel class of agents with natriuretic and osmotic diuretic properties that may benefit patients with cirrhotic ascites. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating SGLT2 inhibitors in adults with decompensated cirrhosis and refractory ascites. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched through January 2025. Eligible studies included RCTs reporting risk ratios (RRs) or hazard ratios (HRs) for ascites-related outcomes. Meta-analyses were performed using fixed- or random-effects models based on heterogeneity. Study quality was assessed using the ROBINS-2 tool. Results: Three RCTs comprising 110 patients met inclusion criteria. Compared to standard therapy, SGLT2 inhibitors significantly reduced the need for large-volume paracentesis (LVP) (HR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.37–0.84, P = 0.005, I² = 0%) and nearly halved the proportion of patients requiring LVP (RR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.33–0.70, P < 0.001). In 2 studies reporting complete ascites resolution, SGLT2 inhibitors were associated with a markedly increased likelihood of ultrasonographic clearance (RR = 9.00, 95% CI: 1.19–68.01, P = 0.03). No significant difference in acute kidney injury (AKI) was observed (RR = 1.98, 95% CI: 0.40–9.81, P = 0.40), though heterogeneity was high (I² = 78%). SGLT2 inhibitor use was associated with increased risks of urinary tract infection (RR = 3.00, 95% CI: 1.34–6.72, P = 0.01) and hyponatremia (RR = 2.80, 95% CI: 1.10–7.10, P = 0.03). Conclusion: SGLT2 inhibitors demonstrate promising efficacy in reducing the need for large-volume paracentesis and achieving ascites resolution in patients with refractory ascites secondary to cirrhosis. However, increased risks of urinary tract infections and hyponatremia warrant cautious patient selection and monitoring. Larger, multicenter trials with longer follow-up are needed to confirm these findings and further assess the safety profile of SGLT2 inhibitors in this population.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Liver Disease and Transplantation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.