S2525 Evaluating FIB-4-Guided MASLD Care in a VA Spinal Cord Unit

Introduction: MASLD is now the leading cause of cirrhosis in the United States. In recent years, tools such as the FIB-4 score and non-invasive tests have helped assess risk and identify patients with fibrosis, allowing for appropriate follow-up. Patients with spinal cord injuries or disorders (SCI/D) may be more vulnerable to steatotic liver disease due to a higher prevalence of metabolic dysfunction, underscoring the need for proper screening. The medical literature has yet to examine the patterns and adequacy of steatotic liver screening in this population. This study evaluates liver fibrosis risk assessment practices in patients with SCI/D at a single Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VA). Methods: This single-center, retrospective chart review involved veterans with paraplegia and tetraplegia due to SCI or multiple sclerosis (MS) at the VA. A total of 100 patients (37% MS and 63% SCI) with an abdominal ultrasound-confirmed diagnosis of steatotic liver disease, randomly selected from 2020 to 2024, had their EMR reviewed. We analyzed patient demographics, clinical profiles, FIB-4 score documentation, and whether appropriate follow-up with non-invasive tests were completed based on FIB-4 risk stratification. Results: Out of the 100 patients included in this study, the majority were men (94%) with a median age of 71.5 years. Only 23% had a FIB-4 score documented in the electronic health record. Despite this, 39% of patients were found to fall into the intermediate (n = 37) or high-risk (n = 2) FIB-4 categories based on calculated scores. Transient elastography was completed in only 10% of the total cohort. Among the 39 intermediate/high-risk patients, just 4 underwent elastography. Conclusion: This quality analysis highlights a significant gap in MASLD risk stratification among veterans with SCI/D. Although 39% of patients had intermediate or high-risk FIB-4 scores, only 26% had the score documented, and just 10% underwent elastography, suggesting under-recognition of liver fibrosis risk. Given that several medications for SCI/D complications are processed through the liver, ensuring liver health is especially important in this population. In the presence of unrecognized fibrosis, these medications could accelerate liver injury or complicate management. As patients with SCI/D are living longer due to medical advances, future efforts should focus on raising awareness of MASLD in this population and developing tailored clinical pathways to ensure timely risk stratification and management.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001137560.07535.a1
Primary Topic
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S2525 Evaluating FIB-4-Guided MASLD Care in a VA Spinal Cord Unit

Rohan Karkra, Muhammad Hassaan Arif Maan, Ethan Shamsian, Joshua E. Pagán-Busigó et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
article

S2525 Evaluating FIB-4-Guided MASLD Care in a VA Spinal Cord Unit

Rohan Karkra, Muhammad Hassaan Arif Maan, Ethan Shamsian, Joshua E. Pagán-Busigó, Juan Pablo de-Torres, Carol Gibson‐Gill, Kranthi Mandava, Sima Vossough‐Teehan, Mahinaz Mohsen, Dean Magat, Tomicka Mc Million
article en

Abstract

Introduction: MASLD is now the leading cause of cirrhosis in the United States. In recent years, tools such as the FIB-4 score and non-invasive tests have helped assess risk and identify patients with fibrosis, allowing for appropriate follow-up. Patients with spinal cord injuries or disorders (SCI/D) may be more vulnerable to steatotic liver disease due to a higher prevalence of metabolic dysfunction, underscoring the need for proper screening. The medical literature has yet to examine the patterns and adequacy of steatotic liver screening in this population. This study evaluates liver fibrosis risk assessment practices in patients with SCI/D at a single Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VA). Methods: This single-center, retrospective chart review involved veterans with paraplegia and tetraplegia due to SCI or multiple sclerosis (MS) at the VA. A total of 100 patients (37% MS and 63% SCI) with an abdominal ultrasound-confirmed diagnosis of steatotic liver disease, randomly selected from 2020 to 2024, had their EMR reviewed. We analyzed patient demographics, clinical profiles, FIB-4 score documentation, and whether appropriate follow-up with non-invasive tests were completed based on FIB-4 risk stratification. Results: Out of the 100 patients included in this study, the majority were men (94%) with a median age of 71.5 years. Only 23% had a FIB-4 score documented in the electronic health record. Despite this, 39% of patients were found to fall into the intermediate (n = 37) or high-risk (n = 2) FIB-4 categories based on calculated scores. Transient elastography was completed in only 10% of the total cohort. Among the 39 intermediate/high-risk patients, just 4 underwent elastography. Conclusion: This quality analysis highlights a significant gap in MASLD risk stratification among veterans with SCI/D. Although 39% of patients had intermediate or high-risk FIB-4 scores, only 26% had the score documented, and just 10% underwent elastography, suggesting under-recognition of liver fibrosis risk. Given that several medications for SCI/D complications are processed through the liver, ensuring liver health is especially important in this population. In the presence of unrecognized fibrosis, these medications could accelerate liver injury or complicate management. As patients with SCI/D are living longer due to medical advances, future efforts should focus on raising awareness of MASLD in this population and developing tailored clinical pathways to ensure timely risk stratification and management.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.