S2573 Anxiety and Depression Outcomes in Liver Transplant Candidates and Recipients Using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale

Introduction: Liver transplantation is a life-saving treatment for patients with end-stage liver disease, but it is associated with significant psychological burdens, including anxiety and depression. They can manifest with varying severity across different subgroups of patients. This study aimed to evaluate the anxiety and depression of this population using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and to identify associated demographic and clinical risk factors. Methods: This study included 113 liver transplant candidates and recipients. Excluded were those <3 months post-transplant, hospitalized in the past 3 months, relisted after a prior transplant, receiving palliative care, with psychiatric disorders besides anxiety and depression, cognitive-impairing conditions, suicidal ideation, or lacking decision-making capacity. Anxiety and depression were assessed using the HADS with an anonymous questionnaire. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on transplant status, donor type, gender, age, body mass index (BMI), education level, and antidepressant use. Results: The mean overall HADS score was 11.16. Although woman participants showed slightly higher mean anxiety, depression, and overall HADS scores, the differences were not statistically significant. Generation Z had the highest anxiety scores (significantly greater than Generation X, P = 0.048, and Baby Boomers, P = 0.034), while Baby Boomers had the highest, albeit non-significant, depression scores. Education level and BMI categories showed no significant group differences. Individuals taking antidepressants had significantly elevated anxiety (P = 0.044) and overall HADS (P = 0.026) scores. Among candidates, having a confirmed living donor was associated with significantly lower depression (P = 0.034) and overall HADS (P = 0.043). Time since transplantation showed no significant correlation with psychological outcomes. Conclusion: Anxiety and depression substantially impact morbidity and mortality during the peri-transplant period. Thus, identifying at-risk groups and taking preventive measures is essential. Younger liver transplant patients have higher anxiety, while older patients show greater depression. Candidates with a confirmed living donor report lower depression and overall psychological distress. BMI and education level have no significant effect on anxiety or depression. Raising awareness for the recognition of the psychological aspect of the transplantation is critical to improve clinical outcomes in this population.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001137752.23001.24
Primary Topic
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S2573 Anxiety and Depression Outcomes in Liver Transplant Candidates and Recipients Using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale

Sabahattin Kaymakoğlu, Bilger Çavuş, Aslı Örmeci, Sezen Genç et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
article

S2573 Anxiety and Depression Outcomes in Liver Transplant Candidates and Recipients Using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale

Sabahattin Kaymakoğlu, Bilger Çavuş, Aslı Örmeci, Sezen Genç, Filiz Akyüz, Ali Emre Bardak, Zülal İstemihan, Volkan Senkal, Ziya İmanov, Kanan Nuriyev, Kadir Demır, Zuhal Yildiz, Fatih S. Besisik, Aynura Rustamzada
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Liver transplantation is a life-saving treatment for patients with end-stage liver disease, but it is associated with significant psychological burdens, including anxiety and depression. They can manifest with varying severity across different subgroups of patients. This study aimed to evaluate the anxiety and depression of this population using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and to identify associated demographic and clinical risk factors. Methods: This study included 113 liver transplant candidates and recipients. Excluded were those <3 months post-transplant, hospitalized in the past 3 months, relisted after a prior transplant, receiving palliative care, with psychiatric disorders besides anxiety and depression, cognitive-impairing conditions, suicidal ideation, or lacking decision-making capacity. Anxiety and depression were assessed using the HADS with an anonymous questionnaire. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on transplant status, donor type, gender, age, body mass index (BMI), education level, and antidepressant use. Results: The mean overall HADS score was 11.16. Although woman participants showed slightly higher mean anxiety, depression, and overall HADS scores, the differences were not statistically significant. Generation Z had the highest anxiety scores (significantly greater than Generation X, P = 0.048, and Baby Boomers, P = 0.034), while Baby Boomers had the highest, albeit non-significant, depression scores. Education level and BMI categories showed no significant group differences. Individuals taking antidepressants had significantly elevated anxiety (P = 0.044) and overall HADS (P = 0.026) scores. Among candidates, having a confirmed living donor was associated with significantly lower depression (P = 0.034) and overall HADS (P = 0.043). Time since transplantation showed no significant correlation with psychological outcomes. Conclusion: Anxiety and depression substantially impact morbidity and mortality during the peri-transplant period. Thus, identifying at-risk groups and taking preventive measures is essential. Younger liver transplant patients have higher anxiety, while older patients show greater depression. Candidates with a confirmed living donor report lower depression and overall psychological distress. BMI and education level have no significant effect on anxiety or depression. Raising awareness for the recognition of the psychological aspect of the transplantation is critical to improve clinical outcomes in this population.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.