Comparative Study between Sodium Hexametaphosphate and Chlorhexidine Mouthwashes on Dental Plaque in Young Age, Clinical Randomized Study

Background: Chlorhexidine (CHX) and sodium hexametaphosphate (SHMP) are commonly used antiplaque agents, yet their comparative efficacy and safety profiles remain under investigation. Objective: To compare the clinical effectiveness and adverse effect profiles of CHX and SHMP mouth rinses in reducing plaque and gingival indices over a 14-day period in adolescents. Patients and Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, 220 participants were assigned equally into two groups (CHX vs. SHMP). Demographic characteristics, medical histories, and baseline clinical indices were recorded. Plaque Index (PI) and Gingival Index (GI) were assessed at baseline, day 7, and day 14. Intra- and inter-group comparisons were conducted using Wilcoxon and Mann–Whitney U tests. Multivariate linear regression identified predictors of PI change, while logistic regression assessed predictors of adverse effects. Results: There were no significant differences in baseline demographic or clinical variables between groups (p > 0.05). Both groups showed significant intra-group reductions in PI and GI from baseline to day 14 (p < 0.001). Inter-group comparison revealed that CHX produced significantly greater reductions in PI and GI at day 7 and day 14 (p < 0.01). Multivariate regression showed that treatment group (β = 0.076, p < 0.001) and baseline PI (β = 0.201, p < 0.001) were significant predictors of PI change. Adverse effects were common in both groups (Day 14: 41.8% CHX vs. 39.1% SHMP, p = 0.680), with no significant differences in frequency or type. Logistic regression showed no significant predictor of adverse events at day 14 (p > 0.05 for all variables). Conclusion: Both CHX and SHMP effectively reduced plaque and gingival inflammation over 14 days, with CHX showing superior clinical performance. However, both agents were associated with a comparable frequency and type of mild adverse effects, suggesting similar tolerability profiles.

Publication Details

Journal
The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21608/ejhm.2025.468937
Primary Topic
Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Study between Sodium Hexametaphosphate and Chlorhexidine Mouthwashes on Dental Plaque in Young Age, Clinical Randomized Study

The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine
Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
article

Comparative Study between Sodium Hexametaphosphate and Chlorhexidine Mouthwashes on Dental Plaque in Young Age, Clinical Randomized Study

article en

Abstract

Background: Chlorhexidine (CHX) and sodium hexametaphosphate (SHMP) are commonly used antiplaque agents, yet their comparative efficacy and safety profiles remain under investigation. Objective: To compare the clinical effectiveness and adverse effect profiles of CHX and SHMP mouth rinses in reducing plaque and gingival indices over a 14-day period in adolescents. Patients and Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, 220 participants were assigned equally into two groups (CHX vs. SHMP). Demographic characteristics, medical histories, and baseline clinical indices were recorded. Plaque Index (PI) and Gingival Index (GI) were assessed at baseline, day 7, and day 14. Intra- and inter-group comparisons were conducted using Wilcoxon and Mann–Whitney U tests. Multivariate linear regression identified predictors of PI change, while logistic regression assessed predictors of adverse effects. Results: There were no significant differences in baseline demographic or clinical variables between groups (p > 0.05). Both groups showed significant intra-group reductions in PI and GI from baseline to day 14 (p < 0.001). Inter-group comparison revealed that CHX produced significantly greater reductions in PI and GI at day 7 and day 14 (p < 0.01). Multivariate regression showed that treatment group (β = 0.076, p < 0.001) and baseline PI (β = 0.201, p < 0.001) were significant predictors of PI change. Adverse effects were common in both groups (Day 14: 41.8% CHX vs. 39.1% SHMP, p = 0.680), with no significant differences in frequency or type. Logistic regression showed no significant predictor of adverse events at day 14 (p > 0.05 for all variables). Conclusion: Both CHX and SHMP effectively reduced plaque and gingival inflammation over 14 days, with CHX showing superior clinical performance. However, both agents were associated with a comparable frequency and type of mild adverse effects, suggesting similar tolerability profiles.

The Egyptian Journal of Hospital MedicineVol. 101(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.