S2398 Optimizing Non-Selective Beta-Blocker Use Among Patients with Compensated Advanced Chronic Liver Disease

Introduction: Non-selective beta-blockers (NSBB), especially carvedilol, have been shown to reduce the risk of hepatic decompensation in patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) and clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH). Liver stiffness (LS) measured by vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE), along with platelet count (plt), can be used to identify patients with cACLD and CSPH; in other words, those eligible for NSBB in whom screening esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) for esophageal varices (EV) may be safely forgone. However, it is unclear whether this recent change in recommendations has been adopted in clinical practice. We aimed to determine the proportion of EGDs for EV screening among patients with cACLD that could potentially be avoided, as well as the current rate of NSBB use. Methods: We identified patients with cACLD who underwent EGD for EV screening at the Minneapolis VA Medical Center between October 1, 2023, and September 30, 2024. CSPH was defined based on imaging evidence of portal hypertension or by LS on VCTE and plt as follows: LS ≥25 kPa; or LS 15-20 kPa with plt < 110 × 103/uL; or LS 20-25 kPa with plt < 150 × 103/uL. We assessed NSBB eligibility, presence of EV, and contraindications to NSBB. Trends in NSBB use were compared before and after May 2024, when the updated recommendations from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases were published. Results: Among 71 patients with cACLD who underwent EGD for EV screening, 78.7% had CSPH, but only 12.6% of these were identified using VCTE and plt. Overall, 64.7% of patients were eligible for NSBB, while 14% had contraindications, making EGD appropriate in those cases. No patients had EV requiring intervention. Comparison of NSBB utilization before and after May 2024 showed no significant change. Conclusion: The results of this study highlight a gap between updated clinical recommendations and their adoption in real-world practice. None of the patients who underwent EGD had EV requiring intervention, and more than two-thirds of these procedures could have been avoided with appropriate NSBB initiation. Our findings highlight the opportunity to increase the use of VCTE and NSBB in the appropriate clinical context.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001137052.78684.8f
Primary Topic
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S2398 Optimizing Non-Selective Beta-Blocker Use Among Patients with Compensated Advanced Chronic Liver Disease

Susan Lou, Prowpanga Udompap, Nirjhar Dutta, Brian L. Hanson et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
article

S2398 Optimizing Non-Selective Beta-Blocker Use Among Patients with Compensated Advanced Chronic Liver Disease

Susan Lou, Prowpanga Udompap, Nirjhar Dutta, Brian L. Hanson, Jameel Alp
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Non-selective beta-blockers (NSBB), especially carvedilol, have been shown to reduce the risk of hepatic decompensation in patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) and clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH). Liver stiffness (LS) measured by vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE), along with platelet count (plt), can be used to identify patients with cACLD and CSPH; in other words, those eligible for NSBB in whom screening esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) for esophageal varices (EV) may be safely forgone. However, it is unclear whether this recent change in recommendations has been adopted in clinical practice. We aimed to determine the proportion of EGDs for EV screening among patients with cACLD that could potentially be avoided, as well as the current rate of NSBB use. Methods: We identified patients with cACLD who underwent EGD for EV screening at the Minneapolis VA Medical Center between October 1, 2023, and September 30, 2024. CSPH was defined based on imaging evidence of portal hypertension or by LS on VCTE and plt as follows: LS ≥25 kPa; or LS 15-20 kPa with plt < 110 × 103/uL; or LS 20-25 kPa with plt < 150 × 103/uL. We assessed NSBB eligibility, presence of EV, and contraindications to NSBB. Trends in NSBB use were compared before and after May 2024, when the updated recommendations from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases were published. Results: Among 71 patients with cACLD who underwent EGD for EV screening, 78.7% had CSPH, but only 12.6% of these were identified using VCTE and plt. Overall, 64.7% of patients were eligible for NSBB, while 14% had contraindications, making EGD appropriate in those cases. No patients had EV requiring intervention. Comparison of NSBB utilization before and after May 2024 showed no significant change. Conclusion: The results of this study highlight a gap between updated clinical recommendations and their adoption in real-world practice. None of the patients who underwent EGD had EV requiring intervention, and more than two-thirds of these procedures could have been avoided with appropriate NSBB initiation. Our findings highlight the opportunity to increase the use of VCTE and NSBB in the appropriate clinical context.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.