Regulatory path transitioning from transient to stable cell lines for AAV manufacturing

AAV manufacturing is transitioning from transient transfection to stable producer cell lines for improved scalability and cost–effectiveness. This framework addresses regulatory considerations for implementing this manufacturing change during clinical development. Risk assessment encompasses technical, regulatory, and business factors. Early-stage transitions pose lower risks with safety-focused comparability studies, while late-stage changes require extensive data addressing both safety and efficacy. Key recommendations include comprehensive cell line characterization with genetic stability evaluation, leakiness assessment, and tier-based acceptance criteria. Master cell bank testing should monitor cell viability, expression levels, titer, and capsid ratios through stability studies. Proactive regulatory communication with agencies like FDA’s CBER is essential for successful implementation, particularly for late-stage manufacturing changes, to ensure regulatory approval while maintaining product quality.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Cell and Gene Therapy Insights
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18609/cgti.2025.112
Primary Topic
Virus-based gene therapy research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Regulatory path transitioning from transient to stable cell lines for AAV manufacturing

Andreia Pedregal, Emmanuelle Cameau, Evelyne Bao-Vi Nguyen, John Staudhammer et al.
Cell and Gene Therapy Insights
Virus-based gene therapy research
article

Regulatory path transitioning from transient to stable cell lines for AAV manufacturing

Andreia Pedregal, Emmanuelle Cameau, Evelyne Bao-Vi Nguyen, John Staudhammer, Catherine Colandro
article en

Abstract

AAV manufacturing is transitioning from transient transfection to stable producer cell lines for improved scalability and cost–effectiveness. This framework addresses regulatory considerations for implementing this manufacturing change during clinical development. Risk assessment encompasses technical, regulatory, and business factors. Early-stage transitions pose lower risks with safety-focused comparability studies, while late-stage changes require extensive data addressing both safety and efficacy. Key recommendations include comprehensive cell line characterization with genetic stability evaluation, leakiness assessment, and tier-based acceptance criteria. Master cell bank testing should monitor cell viability, expression levels, titer, and capsid ratios through stability studies. Proactive regulatory communication with agencies like FDA’s CBER is essential for successful implementation, particularly for late-stage manufacturing changes, to ensure regulatory approval while maintaining product quality.

Cell and Gene Therapy InsightsVol. 11(9)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Virus-based gene therapy research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.