Artificial intelligence in primary care: frameworks, challenges, and guardrails

Artificial intelligence (AI) is already reshaping various aspects of primary care, from documentation and triage to population health planning; however, AI implementation remains fragmented, uneven, and often poorly aligned with the realities of front-line services.In this Viewpoint, we propose a functional framework for categorising AI applications in primary care, using WHO digital health interventions taxonomy as a foundation.We argue that adopting a system-level approach enables clearer identification of implementation gaps, regulatory needs, and maturity areas.Drawing on this system-level structure, we examine the technical, ethical, and operational challenges, and propose a set of high-level principles to guide the safe, equitable, and sustainable integration of AI.We conclude by highlighting the need for strong governance and participatory approaches to ensure that AI strengthens rather than fragments the core values of primary care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Lancet Primary Care
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanprc.2025.100079
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.62

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial intelligence in primary care: frameworks, challenges, and guardrails

Kagiso Ndlovu, Luke Nelson Allen, Luisa M Pettigrew, Jialing Lin et al.
4 citations
The Lancet Primary Care
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
2.62
article

Artificial intelligence in primary care: frameworks, challenges, and guardrails

Kagiso Ndlovu, Luke Nelson Allen, Luisa M Pettigrew, Jialing Lin, Bradley Segal, Davide Bilardi
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is already reshaping various aspects of primary care, from documentation and triage to population health planning; however, AI implementation remains fragmented, uneven, and often poorly aligned with the realities of front-line services.In this Viewpoint, we propose a functional framework for categorising AI applications in primary care, using WHO digital health interventions taxonomy as a foundation.We argue that adopting a system-level approach enables clearer identification of implementation gaps, regulatory needs, and maturity areas.Drawing on this system-level structure, we examine the technical, ethical, and operational challenges, and propose a set of high-level principles to guide the safe, equitable, and sustainable integration of AI.We conclude by highlighting the need for strong governance and participatory approaches to ensure that AI strengthens rather than fragments the core values of primary care.

The Lancet Primary Care
UNSW Sydney (AU), University of Oxford (GB), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), Health Foundation (GB)
David and Elaine Potter Foundation, Ian Potter Foundation, University of New South Wales
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
2.62
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.