Unlocking natural history collections to improve eDNA reference databases and biodiversity monitoring

Biodiversity changes due to human activities highlight the need for efficient biodiversity monitoring approaches. Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding offers a noninvasive method used for biodiversity monitoring and ecosystem assessment, but its accuracy depends on comprehensive DNA reference databases. Natural history collections often contain rare or difficult-to-obtain samples that can serve as a valuable resource to fill gaps in eDNA reference databases. In the present article, we discuss the utility of specimens from natural history collections in supporting future eDNA applications. Museomics-the application of -omics techniques to museum specimens-offers a promising avenue for improving eDNA reference databases by increasing species coverage. Furthermore, museomics can provide transferable methodological advancements for extracting genetic material from samples with low and degraded DNA. The integration of natural history collections, museomics, and eDNA approaches has the potential to significantly improve our understanding of global biodiversity, highlighting the continued importance of natural history collections.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BioScience
Published
2025-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biaf140
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unlocking natural history collections to improve eDNA reference databases and biodiversity monitoring

Nadir Álvarez, Camille P. Albouy, Annamaria Nocita, Michael Matschiner et al.
1 citations
BioScience
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
1.72
article

Unlocking natural history collections to improve eDNA reference databases and biodiversity monitoring

Nadir Álvarez, Camille P. Albouy, Annamaria Nocita, Michael Matschiner, Nicolas Straube, Anja Palandačić, Sarah Schmid, Lukas Rüber, Loïc Pellissier, Moritz Sonnewald, Stéphanie Manel, Peter Rask Møller, Bo Delling, James Maclaine
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Biodiversity changes due to human activities highlight the need for efficient biodiversity monitoring approaches. Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding offers a noninvasive method used for biodiversity monitoring and ecosystem assessment, but its accuracy depends on comprehensive DNA reference databases. Natural history collections often contain rare or difficult-to-obtain samples that can serve as a valuable resource to fill gaps in eDNA reference databases. In the present article, we discuss the utility of specimens from natural history collections in supporting future eDNA applications. Museomics-the application of -omics techniques to museum specimens-offers a promising avenue for improving eDNA reference databases by increasing species coverage. Furthermore, museomics can provide transferable methodological advancements for extracting genetic material from samples with low and degraded DNA. The integration of natural history collections, museomics, and eDNA approaches has the potential to significantly improve our understanding of global biodiversity, highlighting the continued importance of natural history collections.

BioScienceVol. 75(12)
University of Bern (CH), Natural History Museum Vienna (AT), Museum of London (GB), Natural History Museum (GB), University of Ljubljana (SI), École Pratique des Hautes Études (FR), University of Oslo (NO), Institut Universitaire de France (FR), Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (CH), Norsk Teknisk Museum (NO), Swedish Museum of Natural History (SE), Natural History Museum of Geneva (CH), Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt/M (DE), ETH Zurich (CH), Natural History Museum of Bern (CH), Centre d'Écologie Fonctionnelle et Évolutive (FR), Natural History Museum Aarhus (DK), Bavarian State Collection of Zoology (DE), Museo Galileo (IT), Natural History Museum of Denmark (DK), University of Bergen (NO), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE), University of Lausanne (CH)
National Science Foundation, Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.