Reassessing PCI Timing in High Bleeding Risk Patients: Evidence, Strategies, and Outcomes

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with high bleeding risk (HBR) presents a therapeutic challenge, requiring careful balancing of ischemic prevention and bleeding avoidance. The Academic Research Consortium High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) criteria provide a standardized framework for identifying this population, yet optimal PCI timing, procedural strategies, and antithrombotic regimens remain uncertain. This review synthesizes data from randomized controlled trials, large-scale registries, and meta-analyses involving HBR patients undergoing PCI in settings including stable coronary artery disease, acute coronary syndromes (ACS), ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), post-resuscitation states, and malignancy-related thrombocytopenia. Special emphasis is placed on procedural approaches (radial vs. femoral access), device selection (drug-coated balloons, polymer-free drug-eluting stents), and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) duration. Evidence supports the safety of abbreviated DAPT regimens (1-3 months) when combined with bleeding-sparing techniques and devices, with the greatest benefit observed in patients with a high ischemic burden (e.g., GRACE score > 140). Early invasive management in ACS has been associated with reduced ischemic endpoints and shorter hospital stays without a significant rise in major bleeding. Conversely, delayed PCI is advisable in the presence of active bleeding, recent thrombolysis, or severe coagulopathy. Persistent limitations include underrepresentation of ARC-HBR patients in trials and lack of standardized, bleeding risk-tailored timing protocols. PCI in HBR patients can be performed safely and effectively when guided by individualized, evidence-based strategies for procedural timing and antithrombotic therapy. Future directions include integrating biomarker-driven DAPT modulation and artificial intelligence-based decision frameworks to optimize outcomes in this high-risk group.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Published
2025-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.70410
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reassessing PCI Timing in High Bleeding Risk Patients: Evidence, Strategies, and Outcomes

Ahmad Nouri, Abdalhakim R. M. Shubietah, Nadeem Khayat, Atef Akoum et al.
1 citations
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
1.39
article

Reassessing PCI Timing in High Bleeding Risk Patients: Evidence, Strategies, and Outcomes

Ahmad Nouri, Abdalhakim R. M. Shubietah, Nadeem Khayat, Atef Akoum, Ameer Awashra, Ahmed Emara, Ahmad Hamdan, Mohamed S. Elgendy, Mohamed Saad Rakab, Mazen Ibrahem, Anwar Zahran, Mohammed AbuBaha
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with high bleeding risk (HBR) presents a therapeutic challenge, requiring careful balancing of ischemic prevention and bleeding avoidance. The Academic Research Consortium High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) criteria provide a standardized framework for identifying this population, yet optimal PCI timing, procedural strategies, and antithrombotic regimens remain uncertain. This review synthesizes data from randomized controlled trials, large-scale registries, and meta-analyses involving HBR patients undergoing PCI in settings including stable coronary artery disease, acute coronary syndromes (ACS), ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), post-resuscitation states, and malignancy-related thrombocytopenia. Special emphasis is placed on procedural approaches (radial vs. femoral access), device selection (drug-coated balloons, polymer-free drug-eluting stents), and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) duration. Evidence supports the safety of abbreviated DAPT regimens (1-3 months) when combined with bleeding-sparing techniques and devices, with the greatest benefit observed in patients with a high ischemic burden (e.g., GRACE score > 140). Early invasive management in ACS has been associated with reduced ischemic endpoints and shorter hospital stays without a significant rise in major bleeding. Conversely, delayed PCI is advisable in the presence of active bleeding, recent thrombolysis, or severe coagulopathy. Persistent limitations include underrepresentation of ARC-HBR patients in trials and lack of standardized, bleeding risk-tailored timing protocols. PCI in HBR patients can be performed safely and effectively when guided by individualized, evidence-based strategies for procedural timing and antithrombotic therapy. Future directions include integrating biomarker-driven DAPT modulation and artificial intelligence-based decision frameworks to optimize outcomes in this high-risk group.

Catheterization and Cardiovascular InterventionsVol. 107(3)
Mansoura University (EG), An-Najah National University (PS), Al-Azhar University (EG), Tanta University (EG), Tanta University Hospital (EG), Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center (US), Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute (US), Qatar University (QA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.