Nyaya Logic and Analytic Philosophy: Bridging Classical and Modern Traditions

This paper examines the intellectual parallels and points of convergence between the classical Indian Nyaya school of logic and the Western tradition of analytic philosophy. Although separated by vast historical periods and distinct cultural milieus, both traditions share a profound commitment to clarity of argument, linguistic precision, and epistemological rigor. The Nyaya system, with its elaborate theory of inference (anumana), sources of valid knowledge (pramaṇa), and detailed treatment of error (hetvabhasa), anticipates many of the central concerns of modern analytic philosophy, including the nature of reference, propositional structure, justification, and truth. Through a comparative analysis of Nyaya thinkers such as Gautama, Vatsyayana, and Udayana, alongside key figures of analytic philosophy Frege, Russell, and Wittgenstein this study seeks to illuminate a shared philosophical temperament grounded in logical analysis and linguistic investigation. By examining Nyaya’s five-member syllogism, its theory of meaning (sabda-artha-sambandha), and its correspondence model of truth, the paper highlights how classical Indian logic embodies principles analogous to the Fregean concern for sense and reference and the Wittgensteinian quest for linguistic clarity. Methodologically, this research adopts a comparative philosophical framework, not to equate distinct systems but to reveal how each offers complementary insights into the nature of rational inquiry. The paper argues that Nyaya thought represents a systematic and empirically grounded model of reasoning that can enrich contemporary debates on epistemic justification, linguistic meaning, and analytic methodology. Ultimately, the study concludes that bridging these traditions fosters a more inclusive and pluralistic conception of global philosophy one that unites the analytical precision of the West with the metaphysical and ethical depth of the Indian tradition, thereby advancing a truly cross-cultural dialogue in the pursuit of truth and rational understanding.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT AND RESEARCH
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56975/ijedr.v13i4.302980
Primary Topic
Indian and Buddhist Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nyaya Logic and Analytic Philosophy: Bridging Classical and Modern Traditions

Nitu Kumari
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT AND RESEARCH
Indian and Buddhist Studies
article

Nyaya Logic and Analytic Philosophy: Bridging Classical and Modern Traditions

Nitu Kumari
article en

Abstract

This paper examines the intellectual parallels and points of convergence between the classical Indian Nyaya school of logic and the Western tradition of analytic philosophy. Although separated by vast historical periods and distinct cultural milieus, both traditions share a profound commitment to clarity of argument, linguistic precision, and epistemological rigor. The Nyaya system, with its elaborate theory of inference (anumana), sources of valid knowledge (pramaṇa), and detailed treatment of error (hetvabhasa), anticipates many of the central concerns of modern analytic philosophy, including the nature of reference, propositional structure, justification, and truth. Through a comparative analysis of Nyaya thinkers such as Gautama, Vatsyayana, and Udayana, alongside key figures of analytic philosophy Frege, Russell, and Wittgenstein this study seeks to illuminate a shared philosophical temperament grounded in logical analysis and linguistic investigation. By examining Nyaya’s five-member syllogism, its theory of meaning (sabda-artha-sambandha), and its correspondence model of truth, the paper highlights how classical Indian logic embodies principles analogous to the Fregean concern for sense and reference and the Wittgensteinian quest for linguistic clarity. Methodologically, this research adopts a comparative philosophical framework, not to equate distinct systems but to reveal how each offers complementary insights into the nature of rational inquiry. The paper argues that Nyaya thought represents a systematic and empirically grounded model of reasoning that can enrich contemporary debates on epistemic justification, linguistic meaning, and analytic methodology. Ultimately, the study concludes that bridging these traditions fosters a more inclusive and pluralistic conception of global philosophy one that unites the analytical precision of the West with the metaphysical and ethical depth of the Indian tradition, thereby advancing a truly cross-cultural dialogue in the pursuit of truth and rational understanding.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT AND RESEARCHVol. 13(4)
Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Indian and Buddhist Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.