Fashioning Progressiveness: Representations of the Taiping Anti-Foot-Binding Campaign in Mainland China in the Twentieth Century and Beyond

Abstract: This article examines the portrayals of the anti-foot-binding campaign under the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom in twentieth-century China and beyond. By identifying key representations of the Taiping proscription against foot-binding from the early twentieth century onward, this article reveals three sets of binary oppositions: backwardness versus progressiveness, gender inequality versus equality, and barbarism versus civilization. These representations project the prolonged pursuit of modernity and social progress among Chinese intellectuals. However, they also exhibit substantial variation in terms of the assessment and position of the Taiping anti-foot-binding campaign along the diametrical positions of different regimes and institutional contexts over time. These dynamics are not solely contingent upon the initial historical conditions of the Taiping anti-foot-binding movement and the treatment of women in the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom. Rather, they reflect the intricate interplay of shifting political circumstances, prevailing intellectual currents, and the historiography of the Taiping Rebellion.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of women's history
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/jowh.2025.a976861
Primary Topic
Chinese history and philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fashioning Progressiveness: Representations of the Taiping Anti-Foot-Binding Campaign in Mainland China in the Twentieth Century and Beyond

Kai Wan Kwan, Jincao Li
Journal of women's history
Chinese history and philosophy
article

Fashioning Progressiveness: Representations of the Taiping Anti-Foot-Binding Campaign in Mainland China in the Twentieth Century and Beyond

Kai Wan Kwan, Jincao Li
article en

Abstract

Abstract: This article examines the portrayals of the anti-foot-binding campaign under the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom in twentieth-century China and beyond. By identifying key representations of the Taiping proscription against foot-binding from the early twentieth century onward, this article reveals three sets of binary oppositions: backwardness versus progressiveness, gender inequality versus equality, and barbarism versus civilization. These representations project the prolonged pursuit of modernity and social progress among Chinese intellectuals. However, they also exhibit substantial variation in terms of the assessment and position of the Taiping anti-foot-binding campaign along the diametrical positions of different regimes and institutional contexts over time. These dynamics are not solely contingent upon the initial historical conditions of the Taiping anti-foot-binding movement and the treatment of women in the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom. Rather, they reflect the intricate interplay of shifting political circumstances, prevailing intellectual currents, and the historiography of the Taiping Rebellion.

Journal of women's historyVol. 37(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Chinese history and philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Fashioning Progressiveness: Representations of the Taiping Anti-Foot-Binding Campaign in Mainland China in the Twentieth Century and Beyond — Kai Wan Kwan, Jincao Li · Journal of women's history (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS