Does the System Work? Transnational Crises and the Resilience of Global Governance

Abstract In recent decades, global governance has faced significant transnational crises characterized by threat, urgency, and uncertainty, from the Global Financial Crisis to the COVID-19 pandemic. Simultaneously, heterogeneous infrastate, public–private, and private governance institutions have proliferated alongside incumbent interstate institutions. As a result, contemporary global governance takes place through institutional configurations that we call hybrid institutional complexes (HICs). How effectively can HICs respond to the stresses of transnational crises? Drawing on the concept of resilience, we prepare the conceptual and theoretical ground for analyzing the crisis responses of HICs-based governance. To that end, we first identify three dimensions along which the resilience of governance arrangements must be assessed. We then derive two theoretical conjectures as to the conditions under which a HIC will be (more or less) resilient. The first, institutional diversity, is structural; the second, the presence of intellectual and entrepreneurial leaders and bricoleurs, is agentic. To probe the analytical utility of our approach, we assess the performance of the Global Finance HIC in response to the Global Financial Crisis and compare the performance of the Global Health HIC in responding to COVID-19.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Studies Review
Published
2025-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viaf020
Primary Topic
Global Security and Public Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does the System Work? Transnational Crises and the Resilience of Global Governance

Benjamin Faude, Kenneth W. Abbott
International Studies Review
Global Security and Public Health
article

Does the System Work? Transnational Crises and the Resilience of Global Governance

Benjamin Faude, Kenneth W. Abbott
article en

Abstract

Abstract In recent decades, global governance has faced significant transnational crises characterized by threat, urgency, and uncertainty, from the Global Financial Crisis to the COVID-19 pandemic. Simultaneously, heterogeneous infrastate, public–private, and private governance institutions have proliferated alongside incumbent interstate institutions. As a result, contemporary global governance takes place through institutional configurations that we call hybrid institutional complexes (HICs). How effectively can HICs respond to the stresses of transnational crises? Drawing on the concept of resilience, we prepare the conceptual and theoretical ground for analyzing the crisis responses of HICs-based governance. To that end, we first identify three dimensions along which the resilience of governance arrangements must be assessed. We then derive two theoretical conjectures as to the conditions under which a HIC will be (more or less) resilient. The first, institutional diversity, is structural; the second, the presence of intellectual and entrepreneurial leaders and bricoleurs, is agentic. To probe the analytical utility of our approach, we assess the performance of the Global Finance HIC in response to the Global Financial Crisis and compare the performance of the Global Health HIC in responding to COVID-19.

International Studies ReviewVol. 27(4)
Arizona State University (US), University of Glasgow (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Global Security and Public Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.