A comparative study of radiation tolerance between dECM hydrogel-adipose composite biomaterials and traditional breast implants

Postmastectomy breast reconstruction is limited by radiotherapy-induced tissue damage, as silicone implants are prone to capsular contracture, and autologous adipose grafts are limited by resorption and necrosis. In this study, two biomaterials were developed: an injectable decellularized omentum hydrogel-adipose composite (Adipose-dECM) using decellularized omentum hydrogel (dECM) bioactivity for tissue integration and an alginate-reinforced dECM hydrogel (Alg-dECM) for mechanical resilience. O-dECM, Adipose-dECM, Adipose, Alg-dECM, and Silicone were compared in a subcutaneous evaluation in female SD rats (<i>n</i> = 30). Half of the rats underwent radiotherapy (28 Gy) on day 16. The recorded outcomes included small-amplitude oscillatory shear rheology, scanning electron microscopy (porosity), enzymatic mass retention (collagenase), fibrous capsule thickness, inflammatory cell density, the ratio of type I to type III collagen, and angiogenesis. Adipose-dECM showed early postradiotherapy volume retention, although the results were not statistically significant. However, long-term retention decreased to 30.75% on day 50. Compared with the other implants, Adipose-dECM had the lowest inflammatory infiltration and reduced collagen I deposition, although its capsular thickness was similar. Enhanced angiogenesis was detected in Adipose-dECM, with significantly greater CD31+ areas in the peri-implant tissue (1.31% vs 0.10%, <i>p</i> < 0.0001) and septa (0.60% vs 0.07%, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). After radiotherapy, the CD31 level remained elevated in peri-implant regions (0.84% vs 0.34%, <i>p</i> = 0.0010) and septa (0.29% vs 0.06%, <i>p</i> = 0.0003). Adipose-dECM enhanced radiation tolerance through anti-inflammatory modulation and angiogenesis. Nevertheless, its long-term volumetric stability was substantially inferior to that of silicone, indicating the need for material-level strategies to slow degradation while preserving bioactivity. Adipose-dECM therefore shows promise as a radiation-compatible bioactive scaffold for breast reconstruction but requires further optimization for durable clinical translation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Biomaterials & Functional Materials
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/22808000251401786
Primary Topic
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative study of radiation tolerance between dECM hydrogel-adipose composite biomaterials and traditional breast implants

X Chen, L. Y. Tao, Xueqiao Yu, Abiyasi Nanding et al.
Journal of Applied Biomaterials & Functional Materials
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
article

A comparative study of radiation tolerance between dECM hydrogel-adipose composite biomaterials and traditional breast implants

X Chen, L. Y. Tao, Xueqiao Yu, Abiyasi Nanding, Yang Li, Xianyu Zhang, Siliang Zhang, Yajie Gong, Shida Bao, Shuang Gao
article en

Abstract

Postmastectomy breast reconstruction is limited by radiotherapy-induced tissue damage, as silicone implants are prone to capsular contracture, and autologous adipose grafts are limited by resorption and necrosis. In this study, two biomaterials were developed: an injectable decellularized omentum hydrogel-adipose composite (Adipose-dECM) using decellularized omentum hydrogel (dECM) bioactivity for tissue integration and an alginate-reinforced dECM hydrogel (Alg-dECM) for mechanical resilience. O-dECM, Adipose-dECM, Adipose, Alg-dECM, and Silicone were compared in a subcutaneous evaluation in female SD rats (<i>n</i> = 30). Half of the rats underwent radiotherapy (28 Gy) on day 16. The recorded outcomes included small-amplitude oscillatory shear rheology, scanning electron microscopy (porosity), enzymatic mass retention (collagenase), fibrous capsule thickness, inflammatory cell density, the ratio of type I to type III collagen, and angiogenesis. Adipose-dECM showed early postradiotherapy volume retention, although the results were not statistically significant. However, long-term retention decreased to 30.75% on day 50. Compared with the other implants, Adipose-dECM had the lowest inflammatory infiltration and reduced collagen I deposition, although its capsular thickness was similar. Enhanced angiogenesis was detected in Adipose-dECM, with significantly greater CD31+ areas in the peri-implant tissue (1.31% vs 0.10%, <i>p</i> < 0.0001) and septa (0.60% vs 0.07%, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). After radiotherapy, the CD31 level remained elevated in peri-implant regions (0.84% vs 0.34%, <i>p</i> = 0.0010) and septa (0.29% vs 0.06%, <i>p</i> = 0.0003). Adipose-dECM enhanced radiation tolerance through anti-inflammatory modulation and angiogenesis. Nevertheless, its long-term volumetric stability was substantially inferior to that of silicone, indicating the need for material-level strategies to slow degradation while preserving bioactivity. Adipose-dECM therefore shows promise as a radiation-compatible bioactive scaffold for breast reconstruction but requires further optimization for durable clinical translation.

Journal of Applied Biomaterials & Functional MaterialsVol. 23
Harbin Medical University (CN), Third Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University (CN), Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.