SAMA’s principled positioning in upholding global medical ethics

In October 2025, the South African Medical Association (SAMA) suspended all professional and bilateral relations with the Israeli Medical Association (IMA) and called for its suspension from the World Medical Association, citing the IMA’s failure to uphold medical ethics amid Israel’s ongoing military assault on Gaza’s health system. This decisive action follows similar, though less forceful, motions by other national associations, including the British Medical Association, and reflects SAMA’s commitment to ethical accountability under international humanitarian law. Drawing historical parallels with the medical profession’s complicity during apartheid, this article argues that SAMA’s stance constitutes ethical stewardship rather than politicisation, affirming that neutrality in the face of systematic violations of medical ethics equates to complicity. The piece situates SAMA’s decision within a broader call for global medical solidarity, ethical clarity and adherence to the principles of medical neutrality and human rights.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
South African Medical Journal
Published
2025-12-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7196/samj.2025.v115i11.4404
Primary Topic
Health and Conflict Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SAMA’s principled positioning in upholding global medical ethics

Muhammad Moolla, Ayesha Jacub, Leslie London, Leonard Shapiro et al.
South African Medical Journal
Health and Conflict Studies
article

SAMA’s principled positioning in upholding global medical ethics

Muhammad Moolla, Ayesha Jacub, Leslie London, Leonard Shapiro, Hassan Mahomed, Firas Hassan, F Araie
article en

Abstract

In October 2025, the South African Medical Association (SAMA) suspended all professional and bilateral relations with the Israeli Medical Association (IMA) and called for its suspension from the World Medical Association, citing the IMA’s failure to uphold medical ethics amid Israel’s ongoing military assault on Gaza’s health system. This decisive action follows similar, though less forceful, motions by other national associations, including the British Medical Association, and reflects SAMA’s commitment to ethical accountability under international humanitarian law. Drawing historical parallels with the medical profession’s complicity during apartheid, this article argues that SAMA’s stance constitutes ethical stewardship rather than politicisation, affirming that neutrality in the face of systematic violations of medical ethics equates to complicity. The piece situates SAMA’s decision within a broader call for global medical solidarity, ethical clarity and adherence to the principles of medical neutrality and human rights.

South African Medical Journal
Mass General Brigham (US), University of Palestine (PS)
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Health and Conflict Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

SAMA’s principled positioning in upholding global medical ethics — Muhammad Moolla, Ayesha Jacub, et al. · South African Medical Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS