“Arbitration Outcomes for Out-of-Network Medical Bills Under the No Surprises Act”

The No Surprises Act (NSA), implemented in 2022, has protected patients nationally from surprise medical bills in most settings. However, out-of-network care resulting in arbitration between insurers and providers under the NSA may result in very high costs for this care. The objective of this paper is to characterize payments for out-of-network care resulting from disputes that underwent arbitration under the NSA and compare the settlement amounts to in-network prices. Using 2023 dispute and claims data from Elevance Health (EH), we described insurer and provider bids, and compared the final settlement amounts to the qualifying payment amount (QPA) - which is used in arbitration and is intended to represent average in-network market rates - and to in-network prices for similar procedures. Lastly, we compared settlement amounts to Medicare rates. 7076 disputes between EH and providers with arbitration under the NSA were analyzed, eighty percent of which were won by providers. Median (mean) final arbitration amounts were 3.72 (4.99) times the QPA, 2.04 (3.23) times actual median local in-network commercial rates, and 4.5 (5.8) times Medicare rates for the same services. This analysis shows that settlement amounts were substantially higher than QPA and median in-network prices, indicating that out-of-network providers are receiving substantially higher payments than in-network providers when they go through arbitration under the NSA. This contrasts with the Congressional Budget Office's prediction of savings through arbitration settlements close to average in-network prices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
INQUIRY The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580251401475
Primary Topic
Healthcare Policy and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Arbitration Outcomes for Out-of-Network Medical Bills Under the No Surprises Act”

Aliza S. Gordon, Benjamin D. Ukert
INQUIRY The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing
Healthcare Policy and Management
article

“Arbitration Outcomes for Out-of-Network Medical Bills Under the No Surprises Act”

Aliza S. Gordon, Benjamin D. Ukert
article en

Abstract

The No Surprises Act (NSA), implemented in 2022, has protected patients nationally from surprise medical bills in most settings. However, out-of-network care resulting in arbitration between insurers and providers under the NSA may result in very high costs for this care. The objective of this paper is to characterize payments for out-of-network care resulting from disputes that underwent arbitration under the NSA and compare the settlement amounts to in-network prices. Using 2023 dispute and claims data from Elevance Health (EH), we described insurer and provider bids, and compared the final settlement amounts to the qualifying payment amount (QPA) - which is used in arbitration and is intended to represent average in-network market rates - and to in-network prices for similar procedures. Lastly, we compared settlement amounts to Medicare rates. 7076 disputes between EH and providers with arbitration under the NSA were analyzed, eighty percent of which were won by providers. Median (mean) final arbitration amounts were 3.72 (4.99) times the QPA, 2.04 (3.23) times actual median local in-network commercial rates, and 4.5 (5.8) times Medicare rates for the same services. This analysis shows that settlement amounts were substantially higher than QPA and median in-network prices, indicating that out-of-network providers are receiving substantially higher payments than in-network providers when they go through arbitration under the NSA. This contrasts with the Congressional Budget Office's prediction of savings through arbitration settlements close to average in-network prices.

INQUIRY The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and FinancingVol. 62
Public Policy Institute of California (US), Texas A&M University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Healthcare Policy and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.