Characterization of Chickpea Aquafaba From Diverse Sources: A Comprehensive Study on Metal Content, Spectroscopic Properties, and Quality Implications

The metal content and molecular characterization of aquafaba (chickpea cooking water) from various sources: commercial samples packaged in glass jars cooked chickpeas (GJC), tin cans cooked chickpeas (TCC), or BPA-free cans (BFCP), and home-prepared samples using Mexican-origin cooked chickpea (MEXC) or Turkish-origin cooked chickpeas(TURC) chickpeas were comparatively investigated. The concentrations of Al, As, Ca, Cd, Cu, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Na, Ni, Pb, Sr, and Zn in each aquafaba sample were analyzed using ICP OES after a microwave-assisted acid digestion. Additionally, the aquafaba samples' spectroscopic properties were characterized using FT-IR, ultraviolet-visible region (UV-Vis), and molecular fluorescence spectroscopy (MFS). Different packaging materials and preparation methods were examined to evaluate their influence on the chemical composition of aquafaba. The results showed that aquafaba's mineral profile and potentially toxic elements levels vary with packaging type and chickpea origin. Notably, sodium and potassium were the most abundant minerals in all samples. Potassium and magnesium levels were higher in the GJC and BFCP samples, whereas sodium was highest in the TCC samples. The accuracy of the method was further corroborated through analysis of a certified reference material (CRM), Estuarine sediment 1646a. The measured concentration ranges in the samples were as follows: Al: 0.011-0.101, As: BDL, Ca: 1.292-8.459, Cd: BDL, Cu: 0.133-0.236, Fe: 0.051-0.213, K: 14.534-37.547, Mg: 1.974-6.478, Na: 0.743-183.277, Ni: 0.091-0.101, Pb: BDL, Sr: 0.003-0.043, and Zn: 0.003-0.078 mg/L (BDL: below detection limit) spectroscopic analyses (FT-IR and UV-Vis) revealed a similar basic chemical structure for all samples, although their fluorescence properties differed significantly. These findings highlight the importance of monitoring potentially toxic elements in aquafaba for food safety and indicate that production and storage conditions can substantially affect product quality. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: This study presents a comparative assessment of aquafaba (chickpea cooking water) obtained from different sources. Various packaging types and preparation methods (commercial and homemade) are examined to demonstrate how production and storage conditions affect the chemical composition of aquafaba. The results highlight the importance of monitoring potentially toxic elements to ensure food safety and maintain product quality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Food Science
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.70766
Primary Topic
Food composition and properties
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Characterization of Chickpea Aquafaba From Diverse Sources: A Comprehensive Study on Metal Content, Spectroscopic Properties, and Quality Implications

Hüseyin Altundağ, Ümit Ay, Celal Caner, Seda Karayünlü Bozbaş et al.
Journal of Food Science
Food composition and properties
article

Characterization of Chickpea Aquafaba From Diverse Sources: A Comprehensive Study on Metal Content, Spectroscopic Properties, and Quality Implications

Hüseyin Altundağ, Ümit Ay, Celal Caner, Seda Karayünlü Bozbaş, Yusufcan Kanar
article en

Abstract

The metal content and molecular characterization of aquafaba (chickpea cooking water) from various sources: commercial samples packaged in glass jars cooked chickpeas (GJC), tin cans cooked chickpeas (TCC), or BPA-free cans (BFCP), and home-prepared samples using Mexican-origin cooked chickpea (MEXC) or Turkish-origin cooked chickpeas(TURC) chickpeas were comparatively investigated. The concentrations of Al, As, Ca, Cd, Cu, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Na, Ni, Pb, Sr, and Zn in each aquafaba sample were analyzed using ICP OES after a microwave-assisted acid digestion. Additionally, the aquafaba samples' spectroscopic properties were characterized using FT-IR, ultraviolet-visible region (UV-Vis), and molecular fluorescence spectroscopy (MFS). Different packaging materials and preparation methods were examined to evaluate their influence on the chemical composition of aquafaba. The results showed that aquafaba's mineral profile and potentially toxic elements levels vary with packaging type and chickpea origin. Notably, sodium and potassium were the most abundant minerals in all samples. Potassium and magnesium levels were higher in the GJC and BFCP samples, whereas sodium was highest in the TCC samples. The accuracy of the method was further corroborated through analysis of a certified reference material (CRM), Estuarine sediment 1646a. The measured concentration ranges in the samples were as follows: Al: 0.011-0.101, As: BDL, Ca: 1.292-8.459, Cd: BDL, Cu: 0.133-0.236, Fe: 0.051-0.213, K: 14.534-37.547, Mg: 1.974-6.478, Na: 0.743-183.277, Ni: 0.091-0.101, Pb: BDL, Sr: 0.003-0.043, and Zn: 0.003-0.078 mg/L (BDL: below detection limit) spectroscopic analyses (FT-IR and UV-Vis) revealed a similar basic chemical structure for all samples, although their fluorescence properties differed significantly. These findings highlight the importance of monitoring potentially toxic elements in aquafaba for food safety and indicate that production and storage conditions can substantially affect product quality. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: This study presents a comparative assessment of aquafaba (chickpea cooking water) obtained from different sources. Various packaging types and preparation methods (commercial and homemade) are examined to demonstrate how production and storage conditions affect the chemical composition of aquafaba. The results highlight the importance of monitoring potentially toxic elements to ensure food safety and maintain product quality.

Journal of Food ScienceVol. 90(12)
Sakarya University (TR), Sakarya Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR), Kocaeli Üniversitesi (TR)
Kocaeli Üniversitesi, Sakarya Üniversitesi
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Food composition and properties
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.