Responses to Commentators

All four contributors to this symposium provide insightful and challenging comments on Introspection . They each examine different parts of the book: Anna Giustina focuses on inner attention as a mental capacity, exploring how to account for its effects on the flow of experience. Jorge Morales probes the extent of my criticism of confidence ratings in contemporary science of consciousness. Adriana Renero raises concerns about my pluralist account of introspective access. Wayne Wu queries the structure of the basic framework I put forward. All of them offer their critical engagement in a thoroughly constructive spirit, keen to emphasize common ground as much as disagreement or suggestion for amendment. This made their comments helpfully diagnostic, indicating specific places that need further development or argumentation but also highlighting the significance of different theoretical starting points and perspectives in approaching the topics with which Introspection deals. I address what I take to be the main challenges posed in their comments, but all the points and questions raised have had an influence on my thinking about the issues involved. I am very grateful to the four contributors and to Katia Samoilova Franco for organizing and overseeing it all.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Consciousness Studies
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53765/20512201.32.11.245
Primary Topic
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Responses to Commentators

Maja Spener
Journal of Consciousness Studies
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
article

Responses to Commentators

Maja Spener
article en

Abstract

All four contributors to this symposium provide insightful and challenging comments on Introspection . They each examine different parts of the book: Anna Giustina focuses on inner attention as a mental capacity, exploring how to account for its effects on the flow of experience. Jorge Morales probes the extent of my criticism of confidence ratings in contemporary science of consciousness. Adriana Renero raises concerns about my pluralist account of introspective access. Wayne Wu queries the structure of the basic framework I put forward. All of them offer their critical engagement in a thoroughly constructive spirit, keen to emphasize common ground as much as disagreement or suggestion for amendment. This made their comments helpfully diagnostic, indicating specific places that need further development or argumentation but also highlighting the significance of different theoretical starting points and perspectives in approaching the topics with which Introspection deals. I address what I take to be the main challenges posed in their comments, but all the points and questions raised have had an influence on my thinking about the issues involved. I am very grateful to the four contributors and to Katia Samoilova Franco for organizing and overseeing it all.

Journal of Consciousness StudiesVol. 32(11)
University of Birmingham (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Responses to Commentators — Maja Spener · Journal of Consciousness Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS