Metastatic sites and surgical management in stage IV ovarian cancer: Is there a place for debulking surgery in FIGO stage IVB patients? A retrospective study from the ESME national cohort

To evaluate the surgical management and oncologic outcomes of patients with FIGO stage IV ovarian cancer, using data from the French national ESME cohort. This retrospective multicenter study included patients diagnosed with FIGO stage IV ovarian cancer between January 2011 and December 2016, treated in 18 French Comprehensive Cancer Centers participating in the ESME-OVR program. Clinical characteristics, treatment strategies, metastatic site patterns, and survival outcomes (overall survival [OS], progression-free survival [PFS]) were analyzed and compared between FIGO IVA and IVB stages. A total of 159 patients were identified, of whom 107 (67.3 ​%) had FIGO stage IVB disease. Regardless of metastatic stage, surgical strategies and were comparable. Complete debulking surgery was achieved in 75 ​% of cases. Most of FIGO stage IVB patients (88.8 ​%) presented a single metastatic site including extra-abdominal lymph nodes (50.5 ​%), liver (20.6 ​%), and lungs (10.3 ​%); 15.9 ​% of patient with distant metastases underwent local treatment and predominantly targeted nodal disease. Complete debulking surgery was significantly associated with improved OS and PFS (p ​= ​0.002 and p ​< ​0.001, respectively), while local treatment of metastases did not provide survival benefit. The number of metastatic sites did not significantly influence prognosis. Complete debulking surgery is the critical factor from a progronostic point of view, whether in FIGO stage IVA or IVB. Feasibility of local treatment for distant metastases is observed, its impact on oncologic outcomes remains unclear and we need further prospective investigation. Surgical strategies should be integrated into a personalized approach to optimize management in advanced-stage disease.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Surgical Oncology
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cson.2025.100113
Primary Topic
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Metastatic sites and surgical management in stage IV ovarian cancer: Is there a place for debulking surgery in FIGO stage IVB patients? A retrospective study from the ESME national cohort

Navid Mokarram Dorri, Frédéric Marchal, Anne‐Laure Martin, Frédéric Guyon et al.
Clinical Surgical Oncology
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
article

Metastatic sites and surgical management in stage IV ovarian cancer: Is there a place for debulking surgery in FIGO stage IVB patients? A retrospective study from the ESME national cohort

Navid Mokarram Dorri, Frédéric Marchal, Anne‐Laure Martin, Frédéric Guyon, Hélène Costaz, Cécile Loaec, François Cherifi, Enora Laas, Domenico Ferraioli, Marie Gosset, L. Rossi, Quentin Dominique Thomas, Christophe Pomel, Éric Lambaudie, Aude-Marie Savoye, Fabrice Narducci, Christophe Zemmour, Thibault De La Motte Rouge, Thierry Petit, Laura Foulhioux
article en

Abstract

To evaluate the surgical management and oncologic outcomes of patients with FIGO stage IV ovarian cancer, using data from the French national ESME cohort. This retrospective multicenter study included patients diagnosed with FIGO stage IV ovarian cancer between January 2011 and December 2016, treated in 18 French Comprehensive Cancer Centers participating in the ESME-OVR program. Clinical characteristics, treatment strategies, metastatic site patterns, and survival outcomes (overall survival [OS], progression-free survival [PFS]) were analyzed and compared between FIGO IVA and IVB stages. A total of 159 patients were identified, of whom 107 (67.3 ​%) had FIGO stage IVB disease. Regardless of metastatic stage, surgical strategies and were comparable. Complete debulking surgery was achieved in 75 ​% of cases. Most of FIGO stage IVB patients (88.8 ​%) presented a single metastatic site including extra-abdominal lymph nodes (50.5 ​%), liver (20.6 ​%), and lungs (10.3 ​%); 15.9 ​% of patient with distant metastases underwent local treatment and predominantly targeted nodal disease. Complete debulking surgery was significantly associated with improved OS and PFS (p ​= ​0.002 and p ​< ​0.001, respectively), while local treatment of metastases did not provide survival benefit. The number of metastatic sites did not significantly influence prognosis. Complete debulking surgery is the critical factor from a progronostic point of view, whether in FIGO stage IVA or IVB. Feasibility of local treatment for distant metastases is observed, its impact on oncologic outcomes remains unclear and we need further prospective investigation. Surgical strategies should be integrated into a personalized approach to optimize management in advanced-stage disease.

Clinical Surgical OncologyVol. 4(4)
Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg (FR), Centre Georges François Leclerc (FR), Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine (FR), Centre François Baclesse (LU), Centre Léon Bérard (FR), Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest (FR), Centre Eugène Marquis (FR), Centre François Baclesse (FR), Centre Jean Perrin (FR), Centre Oscar Lambret (FR), Institut Bergonié (FR), Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (FR), UniCancer Group (FR), Institut Paoli-Calmettes (FR), Centre Antoine Lacassagne (FR), Institut Jean Godinot (FR), Institut Curie (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.