Phenomenological constraints on Higgs reheating

In many models of inflation, reheating is realized through a coupling between the inflaton and the Higgs boson. Often, the mass of the inflaton is of order <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <a:msup> <a:mn>10</a:mn> <a:mn>13</a:mn> </a:msup> <a:mtext> </a:mtext> <a:mtext> </a:mtext> <a:mi>GeV</a:mi> </a:math> determined by the amplitude of the scalar fluctuation spectrum. However, in models where the inflaton potential is of the form <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <c:mi>V</c:mi> <c:mo>∼</c:mo> <c:msup> <c:mi>ϕ</c:mi> <c:mi>k</c:mi> </c:msup> </c:math> about its minimum, the inflaton is massless for <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <e:mi>k</e:mi> <e:mo>≥</e:mo> <e:mn>4</e:mn> </e:math> unless a bare mass term, <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <g:mfrac> <g:mn>1</g:mn> <g:mn>2</g:mn> </g:mfrac> <g:msubsup> <g:mi>m</g:mi> <g:mi>ϕ</g:mi> <g:mn>2</g:mn> </g:msubsup> <g:msup> <g:mi>ϕ</g:mi> <g:mn>2</g:mn> </g:msup> </g:math> , is present. In this case, the inflaton mass may be of order the electroweak scale and may be subject to existing collider constraints. In particular, we investigate the constraints on the inflaton mass and reheating temperature <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <i:msub> <i:mi>T</i:mi> <i:mrow> <i:mi>rh</i:mi> </i:mrow> </i:msub> </i:math> arising from the decay of <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <k:mi>ϕ</k:mi> </k:math> into <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <m:mi mathvariant="script">H</m:mi> </m:math> through an interaction term <p:math xmlns:p="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <p:mi>μ</p:mi> <p:mi>ϕ</p:mi> <p:mo stretchy="false">|</p:mo> <p:mi mathvariant="script">H</p:mi> <p:msup> <p:mo stretchy="false">|</p:mo> <p:mn>2</p:mn> </p:msup> </p:math> . We perform a renormalization group analysis to determine the relative values of <u:math xmlns:u="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <u:mi>μ</u:mi> </u:math> and <w:math xmlns:w="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <w:msub> <w:mi>m</w:mi> <w:mi>ϕ</w:mi> </w:msub> </w:math> such that the Higgs potential remains stable (and perturbative) at high energy. Taking into account the running of the Higgs quartic self-coupling and the experimental constraints from the LHC via the iggsools public code, we find that <y:math xmlns:y="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <y:mn>3.4</y:mn> <y:mo>×</y:mo> <y:msup> <y:mn>10</y:mn> <y:mn>6</y:mn> </y:msup> <y:mtext> </y:mtext> <y:mtext> </y:mtext> <y:mrow> <y:mi>GeV</y:mi> </y:mrow> <y:mo>≲</y:mo> <y:msub> <y:mi>T</y:mi> <y:mrow> <y:mi>rh</y:mi> </y:mrow> </y:msub> <y:mo>≲</y:mo> <y:mn>3.9</y:mn> <y:mo>×</y:mo> <y:msup> <y:mn>10</y:mn> <y:mn>12</y:mn> </y:msup> <y:mtext> </y:mtext> <y:mtext> </y:mtext> <y:mi>GeV</y:mi> </y:math> with a corresponding constraint on the inflaton bare mass <ab:math xmlns:ab="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <ab:mn>260</ab:mn> <ab:mtext> </ab:mtext> <ab:mtext> </ab:mtext> <ab:mi>GeV</ab:mi> <ab:mo>≲</ab:mo> <ab:msub> <ab:mi>m</ab:mi> <ab:mi>ϕ</ab:mi> </ab:msub> <ab:mo>≲</ab:mo> <ab:mn>3.8</ab:mn> <ab:mo>×</ab:mo> <ab:msup> <ab:mn>10</ab:mn> <ab:mn>10</ab:mn> </ab:msup> <ab:mtext> </ab:mtext> <ab:mtext> </ab:mtext> <ab:mi>GeV</ab:mi> </ab:math> . The dependencies between <cb:math xmlns:cb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <cb:msub> <cb:mi>T</cb:mi> <cb:mrow> <cb:mi>rh</cb:mi> </cb:mrow> </cb:msub> </cb:math> and the inflaton bare mass <eb:math xmlns:eb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <eb:msub> <eb:mi>m</eb:mi> <eb:mi>ϕ</eb:mi> </eb:msub> </eb:math> as well as between <gb:math xmlns:gb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <gb:mi>μ</gb:mi> </gb:math> and <ib:math xmlns:ib="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <ib:msub> <ib:mi>m</ib:mi> <ib:mi>ϕ</ib:mi> </ib:msub> </ib:math> are provided.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/2lqf-qcrg
Primary Topic
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Phenomenological constraints on Higgs reheating

Karl J. Friston
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
article

Phenomenological constraints on Higgs reheating

Karl J. Friston
article en

Abstract

In many models of inflation, reheating is realized through a coupling between the inflaton and the Higgs boson. Often, the mass of the inflaton is of order <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <a:msup> <a:mn>10</a:mn> <a:mn>13</a:mn> </a:msup> <a:mtext> </a:mtext> <a:mtext> </a:mtext> <a:mi>GeV</a:mi> </a:math> determined by the amplitude of the scalar fluctuation spectrum. However, in models where the inflaton potential is of the form <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <c:mi>V</c:mi> <c:mo>∼</c:mo> <c:msup> <c:mi>ϕ</c:mi> <c:mi>k</c:mi> </c:msup> </c:math> about its minimum, the inflaton is massless for <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <e:mi>k</e:mi> <e:mo>≥</e:mo> <e:mn>4</e:mn> </e:math> unless a bare mass term, <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <g:mfrac> <g:mn>1</g:mn> <g:mn>2</g:mn> </g:mfrac> <g:msubsup> <g:mi>m</g:mi> <g:mi>ϕ</g:mi> <g:mn>2</g:mn> </g:msubsup> <g:msup> <g:mi>ϕ</g:mi> <g:mn>2</g:mn> </g:msup> </g:math> , is present. In this case, the inflaton mass may be of order the electroweak scale and may be subject to existing collider constraints. In particular, we investigate the constraints on the inflaton mass and reheating temperature <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <i:msub> <i:mi>T</i:mi> <i:mrow> <i:mi>rh</i:mi> </i:mrow> </i:msub> </i:math> arising from the decay of <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <k:mi>ϕ</k:mi> </k:math> into <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <m:mi mathvariant="script">H</m:mi> </m:math> through an interaction term <p:math xmlns:p="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <p:mi>μ</p:mi> <p:mi>ϕ</p:mi> <p:mo stretchy="false">|</p:mo> <p:mi mathvariant="script">H</p:mi> <p:msup> <p:mo stretchy="false">|</p:mo> <p:mn>2</p:mn> </p:msup> </p:math> . We perform a renormalization group analysis to determine the relative values of <u:math xmlns:u="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <u:mi>μ</u:mi> </u:math> and <w:math xmlns:w="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <w:msub> <w:mi>m</w:mi> <w:mi>ϕ</w:mi> </w:msub> </w:math> such that the Higgs potential remains stable (and perturbative) at high energy. Taking into account the running of the Higgs quartic self-coupling and the experimental constraints from the LHC via the iggsools public code, we find that <y:math xmlns:y="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <y:mn>3.4</y:mn> <y:mo>×</y:mo> <y:msup> <y:mn>10</y:mn> <y:mn>6</y:mn> </y:msup> <y:mtext> </y:mtext> <y:mtext> </y:mtext> <y:mrow> <y:mi>GeV</y:mi> </y:mrow> <y:mo>≲</y:mo> <y:msub> <y:mi>T</y:mi> <y:mrow> <y:mi>rh</y:mi> </y:mrow> </y:msub> <y:mo>≲</y:mo> <y:mn>3.9</y:mn> <y:mo>×</y:mo> <y:msup> <y:mn>10</y:mn> <y:mn>12</y:mn> </y:msup> <y:mtext> </y:mtext> <y:mtext> </y:mtext> <y:mi>GeV</y:mi> </y:math> with a corresponding constraint on the inflaton bare mass <ab:math xmlns:ab="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <ab:mn>260</ab:mn> <ab:mtext> </ab:mtext> <ab:mtext> </ab:mtext> <ab:mi>GeV</ab:mi> <ab:mo>≲</ab:mo> <ab:msub> <ab:mi>m</ab:mi> <ab:mi>ϕ</ab:mi> </ab:msub> <ab:mo>≲</ab:mo> <ab:mn>3.8</ab:mn> <ab:mo>×</ab:mo> <ab:msup> <ab:mn>10</ab:mn> <ab:mn>10</ab:mn> </ab:msup> <ab:mtext> </ab:mtext> <ab:mtext> </ab:mtext> <ab:mi>GeV</ab:mi> </ab:math> . The dependencies between <cb:math xmlns:cb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <cb:msub> <cb:mi>T</cb:mi> <cb:mrow> <cb:mi>rh</cb:mi> </cb:mrow> </cb:msub> </cb:math> and the inflaton bare mass <eb:math xmlns:eb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <eb:msub> <eb:mi>m</eb:mi> <eb:mi>ϕ</eb:mi> </eb:msub> </eb:math> as well as between <gb:math xmlns:gb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <gb:mi>μ</gb:mi> </gb:math> and <ib:math xmlns:ib="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <ib:msub> <ib:mi>m</ib:mi> <ib:mi>ϕ</ib:mi> </ib:msub> </ib:math> are provided.

Physical review. D/Physical review. D.Vol. 112(11)
Université Paris-Saclay (FR), University of Minnesota System (US), Sorbonne Université (FR), Laboratoire de Physique Théorique et Hautes Energies (FR), Laboratoire de Physique des 2 Infinis Irène Joliot-Curie (FR), Laboratoire Médiations (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.