Surface Runoff and Sediment Yield Modelling Under No‐Till: Chiselling and Crop Management Effects

ABSTRACT No‐till conserves the soil by minimizing disturbance and maintaining crop residue on the surface; however, runoff generation and propagation on no‐till hillslopes are not well understood due to the high cost and labor requirements of field monitoring. Hydrological models can help advance this understanding by simulating runoff, sediment yield, and infiltration under different management conditions. This study evaluated the performance of the LISEM model in simulating runoff and sediment yield on hillslopes under no‐till agriculture with different soil management practices (with and without chiseling) and cover crop levels, and compared model‐simulated infiltration (Green‐Ampt method) with apparent infiltration derived from field observations. Rainfall events were monitored from 2014 to 2018 in experimental units of 0.6 ha and 2.5 ha. Nineteen events covering a range of rainfall intensities and seasons were recorded using manual and automatic measurements (2–5 min intervals). LISEM was calibrated and validated for runoff and sediment yield at both spatial scales. For calibration events, Green‐Ampt infiltration was directly compared with apparent infiltration estimated from rainfall‐runoff data. Model performance was assessed using NSE and PBIAS. Runoff simulations showed good calibration (NSE = 0.99) and satisfactory validation (NSE > 0.5). Sediment yield was well reproduced during calibration but showed lower accuracy in validation, requiring reduced soil cohesion to match observed values. Infiltration simulated by the Green‐Ampt method correlated strongly with apparent infiltration (NSE > 0.98), especially at the larger scale, where spatial variability is lower. Overall, the results demonstrate that LISEM can adequately represent runoff processes and infiltration in no‐till systems with different management practices and surface cover conditions. The model provides a useful tool for evaluating and designing conservation practices, such as broad‐based terraces and retention or detention structures, aimed at mitigating excess runoff and soil loss in agricultural landscapes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hydrological Processes
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.70354
Primary Topic
Soil erosion and sediment transport
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Surface Runoff and Sediment Yield Modelling Under No‐Till: Chiselling and Crop Management Effects

Olivier Cerdan, Fábio José Andres Schneider, Gustavo Henrique Merten, Ana Lúcia Londero et al.
Hydrological Processes
Soil erosion and sediment transport
article

Surface Runoff and Sediment Yield Modelling Under No‐Till: Chiselling and Crop Management Effects

Olivier Cerdan, Fábio José Andres Schneider, Gustavo Henrique Merten, Ana Lúcia Londero, Olivier Evrard, Dinis Deuschle, Alice Prates Bisso Dambroz, Jean Paolo Gomes Minella
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT No‐till conserves the soil by minimizing disturbance and maintaining crop residue on the surface; however, runoff generation and propagation on no‐till hillslopes are not well understood due to the high cost and labor requirements of field monitoring. Hydrological models can help advance this understanding by simulating runoff, sediment yield, and infiltration under different management conditions. This study evaluated the performance of the LISEM model in simulating runoff and sediment yield on hillslopes under no‐till agriculture with different soil management practices (with and without chiseling) and cover crop levels, and compared model‐simulated infiltration (Green‐Ampt method) with apparent infiltration derived from field observations. Rainfall events were monitored from 2014 to 2018 in experimental units of 0.6 ha and 2.5 ha. Nineteen events covering a range of rainfall intensities and seasons were recorded using manual and automatic measurements (2–5 min intervals). LISEM was calibrated and validated for runoff and sediment yield at both spatial scales. For calibration events, Green‐Ampt infiltration was directly compared with apparent infiltration estimated from rainfall‐runoff data. Model performance was assessed using NSE and PBIAS. Runoff simulations showed good calibration (NSE = 0.99) and satisfactory validation (NSE > 0.5). Sediment yield was well reproduced during calibration but showed lower accuracy in validation, requiring reduced soil cohesion to match observed values. Infiltration simulated by the Green‐Ampt method correlated strongly with apparent infiltration (NSE > 0.98), especially at the larger scale, where spatial variability is lower. Overall, the results demonstrate that LISEM can adequately represent runoff processes and infiltration in no‐till systems with different management practices and surface cover conditions. The model provides a useful tool for evaluating and designing conservation practices, such as broad‐based terraces and retention or detention structures, aimed at mitigating excess runoff and soil loss in agricultural landscapes.

Hydrological ProcessesVol. 39(12)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (FR), Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR), Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (BR), University of Minnesota, Duluth (US), Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement (FR), CEA Paris-Saclay (FR), Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières (FR)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Soil erosion and sediment transport
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.