Behavior and Impact of Vacuum Pressure and Pore Pressure during Monitoring Process of Vacuum Preloading

ABSTRACT During the monitoring process of vacuum preloading, varying measurement operations lead to discrepancies in the recorded values and interpretations of vacuum pressure (VP) and pore water pressure (PP) persist. This study presents a series of vacuum preloading tests to investigate the attenuation patterns of VP and PP in soil across different locations and their relationship. The impact of several operational factors, including distance from the drainage boundary, water content, groundwater, vacuum pump power, and vacuum pipe length, is analyzed. Results show that VP and PP in the soil changed consistently during vacuum preloading, and both attenuated from the input 98 kPa to 60–70 kPa at 5 cm from the drainage boundary. This attenuation, which was intensified by increasing propagation distance and groundwater presence, reduced the consolidation pressure on the soil and led to a lower degree of consolidation. Both lower vacuum pump power and longer vacuum pipes delayed the initial VP reading by 39–48 h and increased the VP monitoring error to around 30–40 kPa. Using PP provided a more accurate representation of soil consolidation in practical applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geotechnical Testing Journal
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1520/gtj20240238
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Behavior and Impact of Vacuum Pressure and Pore Pressure during Monitoring Process of Vacuum Preloading

Wen-Hao Cai, Jun Wang, Hongzhi Liu, Jianfeng Wu et al.
Geotechnical Testing Journal
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
article

Behavior and Impact of Vacuum Pressure and Pore Pressure during Monitoring Process of Vacuum Preloading

Wen-Hao Cai, Jun Wang, Hongzhi Liu, Jianfeng Wu, Peng Wang, Hao Qiao
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT During the monitoring process of vacuum preloading, varying measurement operations lead to discrepancies in the recorded values and interpretations of vacuum pressure (VP) and pore water pressure (PP) persist. This study presents a series of vacuum preloading tests to investigate the attenuation patterns of VP and PP in soil across different locations and their relationship. The impact of several operational factors, including distance from the drainage boundary, water content, groundwater, vacuum pump power, and vacuum pipe length, is analyzed. Results show that VP and PP in the soil changed consistently during vacuum preloading, and both attenuated from the input 98 kPa to 60–70 kPa at 5 cm from the drainage boundary. This attenuation, which was intensified by increasing propagation distance and groundwater presence, reduced the consolidation pressure on the soil and led to a lower degree of consolidation. Both lower vacuum pump power and longer vacuum pipes delayed the initial VP reading by 39–48 h and increased the VP monitoring error to around 30–40 kPa. Using PP provided a more accurate representation of soil consolidation in practical applications.

Geotechnical Testing JournalVol. 48(6)
Wenzhou University (CN), Zhejiang Energy Research Institute (CN), Economic Research Institute (BG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.