Calibration Techniques for Improved Moisture Content Measurements Using a Hybrid Nuclear-Electric Density Gauge

ABSTRACT Rapid and accurate measurement of soil moisture content in situ during earthwork construction is critical, ensuring soils are compacted to their optimum condition. Consequently, field control of compaction moisture content is common in most existing quality assurance / quality control (QA/QC) specifications. Within the United States, the nuclear density gauge (NDG) has become the device of choice for inferring the in situ moisture content of compacted soils in a rapid and reliable manner. Recently, a relatively new test device termed the “EGauge” has been developed as a potential alternative for the NDG, as it emits significantly lower levels of radiation, consequently making it safer to use relative to the NDG. However, recent research has shown that the EGauge’s moisture measurements made using the manufacturer’s standard calibration may be inaccurate for some soil types. When these moisture content readings are inaccurate for a soil of interest, ASTM D8153-22, Standard Test Method for Determination of Soil Water Contents Using a Dielectric Permittivity Probe, recommends performing a soil-specific calibration. This manuscript examines the use of three calibration methodologies that were used to develop soil-specific calibration models to enhance the EGauge’s ability to estimate moisture content in situ. More specifically, the calibration approach proposed by ASTM D8153-22, a simple multivariate regression calibration approach, and a more sophisticated calibration approach involving the machine learning technique multigene genetic programming were implemented in this study. Results from this study showed that all three calibration approaches enhanced the EGauge’s ability to estimate moisture content in situ by up to 80 % relative to the manufacturer’s standard calibration. More importantly, the results from this study indicate that the EGauge may be a viable replacement for the NDG as a QA/QC tool to monitor the soil compaction process, with the caveat that efforts need to be made to independently develop a soil-specific calibration model for soil moisture content estimation purposes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geotechnical Testing Journal
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1520/gtj20240131
Primary Topic
Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Calibration Techniques for Improved Moisture Content Measurements Using a Hybrid Nuclear-Electric Density Gauge

Christopher L. Meehan, William J. Baker
Geotechnical Testing Journal
Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing
article

Calibration Techniques for Improved Moisture Content Measurements Using a Hybrid Nuclear-Electric Density Gauge

Christopher L. Meehan, William J. Baker
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Rapid and accurate measurement of soil moisture content in situ during earthwork construction is critical, ensuring soils are compacted to their optimum condition. Consequently, field control of compaction moisture content is common in most existing quality assurance / quality control (QA/QC) specifications. Within the United States, the nuclear density gauge (NDG) has become the device of choice for inferring the in situ moisture content of compacted soils in a rapid and reliable manner. Recently, a relatively new test device termed the “EGauge” has been developed as a potential alternative for the NDG, as it emits significantly lower levels of radiation, consequently making it safer to use relative to the NDG. However, recent research has shown that the EGauge’s moisture measurements made using the manufacturer’s standard calibration may be inaccurate for some soil types. When these moisture content readings are inaccurate for a soil of interest, ASTM D8153-22, Standard Test Method for Determination of Soil Water Contents Using a Dielectric Permittivity Probe, recommends performing a soil-specific calibration. This manuscript examines the use of three calibration methodologies that were used to develop soil-specific calibration models to enhance the EGauge’s ability to estimate moisture content in situ. More specifically, the calibration approach proposed by ASTM D8153-22, a simple multivariate regression calibration approach, and a more sophisticated calibration approach involving the machine learning technique multigene genetic programming were implemented in this study. Results from this study showed that all three calibration approaches enhanced the EGauge’s ability to estimate moisture content in situ by up to 80 % relative to the manufacturer’s standard calibration. More importantly, the results from this study indicate that the EGauge may be a viable replacement for the NDG as a QA/QC tool to monitor the soil compaction process, with the caveat that efforts need to be made to independently develop a soil-specific calibration model for soil moisture content estimation purposes.

Geotechnical Testing JournalVol. 48(6)
Federal Highway Administration (US), University of Delaware (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.