Combining physics education and machine learning research to measure evidence of students’ mechanistic sensemaking

Advances in machine learning (ML) offer new possibilities for science education research. We report on early progress in the design of an ML-based tool to analyze students’ mechanistic sensemaking, working from a coding scheme that is aligned with previous work in physics education research (PER) and that is amenable to recently developed ML classification strategies using language encoders. We describe pilot tests of the tool, in three versions with different language encoders, to analyze sensemaking evident in college students’ written responses to brief conceptual questions. The results show, first, that the tool’s measurements of sensemaking can achieve useful agreement with a human coder, and, second, that encoder design choices entail a tradeoff between accuracy and computational expense. We discuss the promise and limitations of this approach, providing examples of how this measurement scheme may serve PER in the future. We conclude with reflections on the use of ML to support PER research, offering cautious optimism for strategies of codesign between PER and ML.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical Review Physics Education Research
Published
2025-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/v6gw-lv4c
Primary Topic
Science Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Combining physics education and machine learning research to measure evidence of students’ mechanistic sensemaking

Karl J. Friston
Physical Review Physics Education Research
Science Education and Pedagogy
article

Combining physics education and machine learning research to measure evidence of students’ mechanistic sensemaking

Karl J. Friston
article en

Abstract

Advances in machine learning (ML) offer new possibilities for science education research. We report on early progress in the design of an ML-based tool to analyze students’ mechanistic sensemaking, working from a coding scheme that is aligned with previous work in physics education research (PER) and that is amenable to recently developed ML classification strategies using language encoders. We describe pilot tests of the tool, in three versions with different language encoders, to analyze sensemaking evident in college students’ written responses to brief conceptual questions. The results show, first, that the tool’s measurements of sensemaking can achieve useful agreement with a human coder, and, second, that encoder design choices entail a tradeoff between accuracy and computational expense. We discuss the promise and limitations of this approach, providing examples of how this measurement scheme may serve PER in the future. We conclude with reflections on the use of ML to support PER research, offering cautious optimism for strategies of codesign between PER and ML.

Physical Review Physics Education ResearchVol. 21(2)
Tufts University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Science Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Combining physics education and machine learning research to measure evidence of students’ mechanistic sensemaking — Karl J. Friston · Physical Review Physics Education Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS