Quantum Routing and Entanglement Dynamics Through Bottlenecks

To implement arbitrary quantum circuits in architectures with restricted interactions, one may effectively simulate all-to-all connectivity by routing quantum information. We consider the entanglement dynamics and routing between two regions only connected through an intermediate “bottleneck” region with few qubits. In such systems, where the entanglement rate is restricted by a vertex boundary rather than an edge boundary of the underlying interaction graph, existing results such as the small incremental entangling theorem give only a trivial constant lower bound on the routing time (the minimum time to perform an arbitrary permutation). We significantly improve the lower bound on the routing time in systems with a vertex bottleneck. Specifically, for any system with two regions <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <a:mi>L</a:mi> <a:mo>,</a:mo> <a:mi>R</a:mi> </a:math> with <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <c:msub> <c:mi>N</c:mi> <c:mi>L</c:mi> </c:msub> <c:mo>,</c:mo> <c:msub> <c:mi>N</c:mi> <c:mi>R</c:mi> </c:msub> </c:math> qubits, respectively, coupled only through an intermediate region <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <e:mi>C</e:mi> </e:math> with <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <g:msub> <g:mi>N</g:mi> <g:mi>C</g:mi> </g:msub> </g:math> qubits, for any <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <i:mi>δ</i:mi> <i:mo>&gt;</i:mo> <i:mn>0</i:mn> </i:math> we show a lower bound of <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <k:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</k:mi> <k:mo stretchy="false">(</k:mo> <k:msubsup> <k:mi>N</k:mi> <k:mi>R</k:mi> <k:mrow> <k:mn>1</k:mn> <k:mo>−</k:mo> <k:mi>δ</k:mi> </k:mrow> </k:msubsup> <k:mo>/</k:mo> <k:msqrt> <k:msub> <k:mi>N</k:mi> <k:mi>L</k:mi> </k:msub> </k:msqrt> <k:msub> <k:mi>N</k:mi> <k:mi>C</k:mi> </k:msub> <k:mo stretchy="false">)</k:mo> </k:math> on the Hamiltonian quantum routing time when using piecewise time-independent Hamiltonians, or time-dependent Hamiltonians subject to a smoothness condition. We also prove an upper bound on the average amount of bipartite entanglement between <p:math xmlns:p="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <p:mi>L</p:mi> </p:math> and <r:math xmlns:r="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <r:mi>C</r:mi> <r:mo>,</r:mo> <r:mi>R</r:mi> </r:math> that can be generated in time <t:math xmlns:t="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <t:mi>t</t:mi> </t:math> by such architecture-respecting Hamiltonians in systems constrained by vertex bottlenecks, improving the scaling in the system size from <v:math xmlns:v="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <v:mi>O</v:mi> <v:mo stretchy="false">(</v:mo> <v:msub> <v:mi>N</v:mi> <v:mi>L</v:mi> </v:msub> <v:mi>t</v:mi> <v:mo stretchy="false">)</v:mo> </v:math> to <z:math xmlns:z="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <z:mi>O</z:mi> <z:mo stretchy="false">(</z:mo> <z:msqrt> <z:msub> <z:mi>N</z:mi> <z:mi>L</z:mi> </z:msub> </z:msqrt> <z:mi>t</z:mi> <z:mo stretchy="false">)</z:mo> </z:math> . As a special case, when applied to the star graph (i.e., one vertex connected to <db:math xmlns:db="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <db:mi>N</db:mi> </db:math> leaves), we obtain an <fb:math xmlns:fb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <fb:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</fb:mi> <fb:mo stretchy="false">(</fb:mo> <fb:msqrt> <fb:msup> <fb:mi>N</fb:mi> <fb:mrow> <fb:mn>1</fb:mn> <fb:mo>−</fb:mo> <fb:mi>δ</fb:mi> </fb:mrow> </fb:msup> </fb:msqrt> <fb:mo stretchy="false">)</fb:mo> </fb:math> lower bound on the routing time and on the time to prepare <kb:math xmlns:kb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <kb:mi>N</kb:mi> <kb:mo>/</kb:mo> <kb:mn>2</kb:mn> </kb:math> Bell pairs between the vertices. We also show that, in systems of free particles, we can route optimally on the star graph in time <mb:math xmlns:mb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mb:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mb:mi> <mb:mo stretchy="false">(</mb:mo> <mb:msqrt> <mb:mi>N</mb:mi> </mb:msqrt> <mb:mo stretchy="false">)</mb:mo> </mb:math> using Hamiltonian quantum routing, obtaining a speedup over gate-based routing, which takes time <rb:math xmlns:rb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <rb:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</rb:mi> <rb:mo stretchy="false">(</rb:mo> <rb:mi>N</rb:mi> <rb:mo stretchy="false">)</rb:mo> </rb:math> .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PRX Quantum
Published
2025-12-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/7b1x-hjcy
Primary Topic
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantum Routing and Entanglement Dynamics Through Bottlenecks

Karl J. Friston
PRX Quantum
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
article

Quantum Routing and Entanglement Dynamics Through Bottlenecks

Karl J. Friston
article en

Abstract

To implement arbitrary quantum circuits in architectures with restricted interactions, one may effectively simulate all-to-all connectivity by routing quantum information. We consider the entanglement dynamics and routing between two regions only connected through an intermediate “bottleneck” region with few qubits. In such systems, where the entanglement rate is restricted by a vertex boundary rather than an edge boundary of the underlying interaction graph, existing results such as the small incremental entangling theorem give only a trivial constant lower bound on the routing time (the minimum time to perform an arbitrary permutation). We significantly improve the lower bound on the routing time in systems with a vertex bottleneck. Specifically, for any system with two regions <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <a:mi>L</a:mi> <a:mo>,</a:mo> <a:mi>R</a:mi> </a:math> with <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <c:msub> <c:mi>N</c:mi> <c:mi>L</c:mi> </c:msub> <c:mo>,</c:mo> <c:msub> <c:mi>N</c:mi> <c:mi>R</c:mi> </c:msub> </c:math> qubits, respectively, coupled only through an intermediate region <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <e:mi>C</e:mi> </e:math> with <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <g:msub> <g:mi>N</g:mi> <g:mi>C</g:mi> </g:msub> </g:math> qubits, for any <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <i:mi>δ</i:mi> <i:mo>&gt;</i:mo> <i:mn>0</i:mn> </i:math> we show a lower bound of <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <k:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</k:mi> <k:mo stretchy="false">(</k:mo> <k:msubsup> <k:mi>N</k:mi> <k:mi>R</k:mi> <k:mrow> <k:mn>1</k:mn> <k:mo>−</k:mo> <k:mi>δ</k:mi> </k:mrow> </k:msubsup> <k:mo>/</k:mo> <k:msqrt> <k:msub> <k:mi>N</k:mi> <k:mi>L</k:mi> </k:msub> </k:msqrt> <k:msub> <k:mi>N</k:mi> <k:mi>C</k:mi> </k:msub> <k:mo stretchy="false">)</k:mo> </k:math> on the Hamiltonian quantum routing time when using piecewise time-independent Hamiltonians, or time-dependent Hamiltonians subject to a smoothness condition. We also prove an upper bound on the average amount of bipartite entanglement between <p:math xmlns:p="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <p:mi>L</p:mi> </p:math> and <r:math xmlns:r="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <r:mi>C</r:mi> <r:mo>,</r:mo> <r:mi>R</r:mi> </r:math> that can be generated in time <t:math xmlns:t="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <t:mi>t</t:mi> </t:math> by such architecture-respecting Hamiltonians in systems constrained by vertex bottlenecks, improving the scaling in the system size from <v:math xmlns:v="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <v:mi>O</v:mi> <v:mo stretchy="false">(</v:mo> <v:msub> <v:mi>N</v:mi> <v:mi>L</v:mi> </v:msub> <v:mi>t</v:mi> <v:mo stretchy="false">)</v:mo> </v:math> to <z:math xmlns:z="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <z:mi>O</z:mi> <z:mo stretchy="false">(</z:mo> <z:msqrt> <z:msub> <z:mi>N</z:mi> <z:mi>L</z:mi> </z:msub> </z:msqrt> <z:mi>t</z:mi> <z:mo stretchy="false">)</z:mo> </z:math> . As a special case, when applied to the star graph (i.e., one vertex connected to <db:math xmlns:db="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <db:mi>N</db:mi> </db:math> leaves), we obtain an <fb:math xmlns:fb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <fb:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</fb:mi> <fb:mo stretchy="false">(</fb:mo> <fb:msqrt> <fb:msup> <fb:mi>N</fb:mi> <fb:mrow> <fb:mn>1</fb:mn> <fb:mo>−</fb:mo> <fb:mi>δ</fb:mi> </fb:mrow> </fb:msup> </fb:msqrt> <fb:mo stretchy="false">)</fb:mo> </fb:math> lower bound on the routing time and on the time to prepare <kb:math xmlns:kb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <kb:mi>N</kb:mi> <kb:mo>/</kb:mo> <kb:mn>2</kb:mn> </kb:math> Bell pairs between the vertices. We also show that, in systems of free particles, we can route optimally on the star graph in time <mb:math xmlns:mb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mb:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mb:mi> <mb:mo stretchy="false">(</mb:mo> <mb:msqrt> <mb:mi>N</mb:mi> </mb:msqrt> <mb:mo stretchy="false">)</mb:mo> </mb:math> using Hamiltonian quantum routing, obtaining a speedup over gate-based routing, which takes time <rb:math xmlns:rb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <rb:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</rb:mi> <rb:mo stretchy="false">(</rb:mo> <rb:mi>N</rb:mi> <rb:mo stretchy="false">)</rb:mo> </rb:math> .

PRX QuantumVol. 7(1)
IBM (United States) (US), Los Alamos National Laboratory (US), University of Colorado Boulder (US), University of Colorado System (US), Joint Center for Quantum Information and Computer Science (US), Joint Quantum Institute (US), University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.