S2321 Risk of Bleeding After Esophagogastroduodenoscopy With Mucosal Resection in Patients With Cirrhosis

Introduction: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is a procedure used for evaluation and management of different upper gastrointestinal lesions. However, cirrhosis-associated coagulopathy and portal hypertension may increase the risk of post-procedural complications. This study aimed to evaluate the 30-day risk of bleeding and other adverse outcomes following EGD with EMR in patients with cirrhosis compared to matched non-cirrhotic controls. Methods: This retrospective cohort study utilized data from the U.S. Collaborative Network to evaluate the risk of bleeding following Esophagogastroduodenoscopy with EMR in patients with cirrhosis compared to matched controls. One-to-one propensity score matching was employed, with the primary outcome being bleeding within 30 days of the procedure. Bleeding risk was further analyzed based on cirrhosis severity, categorized as compensated or decompensated. Results: After propensity score matching, each cohort included 1,045 patients. Patients with cirrhosis had a higher risk of post-EMR bleeding (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.21–2.25, P = 0.002) and were more likely to require blood transfusion (OR 2.54, 95% CI 1.21–5.31, P = 0.011). However, ICU admissions (OR 1.33, 95% CI 0.79–2.25, P = 0.29) and endoscopic reinterventions (OR 1.31, 95% CI 0.83–2.06, P = 0.25) were not significantly different between cohorts. Patients with decompensated cirrhosis had a significantly higher risk of post-EMR bleeding compared to controls (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.05–2.51, P = 0.03), whereas patients with compensated cirrhosis did not demonstrate an increased bleeding risk (OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.72–1.86, P = 0.55). Additionally, ICU admission, blood transfusion, and reintervention rates were not significantly different from controls in either group. Conclusion: This matched cohort study found increased rates of post-procedural bleeding and transfusion in cirrhotic patients undergoing EGD with EMR, primarily among those with decompensated disease. Compensated cirrhosis was not associated with higher complication rates. These results highlight the importance of optimizing coagulopathy and carefully planning the procedure in patients with decompensated cirrhosis.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001136744.03065.78
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S2321 Risk of Bleeding After Esophagogastroduodenoscopy With Mucosal Resection in Patients With Cirrhosis

Razan Aburumman, Saqr Alsakarneh, Sumit Singla
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
article

S2321 Risk of Bleeding After Esophagogastroduodenoscopy With Mucosal Resection in Patients With Cirrhosis

Razan Aburumman, Saqr Alsakarneh, Sumit Singla
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is a procedure used for evaluation and management of different upper gastrointestinal lesions. However, cirrhosis-associated coagulopathy and portal hypertension may increase the risk of post-procedural complications. This study aimed to evaluate the 30-day risk of bleeding and other adverse outcomes following EGD with EMR in patients with cirrhosis compared to matched non-cirrhotic controls. Methods: This retrospective cohort study utilized data from the U.S. Collaborative Network to evaluate the risk of bleeding following Esophagogastroduodenoscopy with EMR in patients with cirrhosis compared to matched controls. One-to-one propensity score matching was employed, with the primary outcome being bleeding within 30 days of the procedure. Bleeding risk was further analyzed based on cirrhosis severity, categorized as compensated or decompensated. Results: After propensity score matching, each cohort included 1,045 patients. Patients with cirrhosis had a higher risk of post-EMR bleeding (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.21–2.25, P = 0.002) and were more likely to require blood transfusion (OR 2.54, 95% CI 1.21–5.31, P = 0.011). However, ICU admissions (OR 1.33, 95% CI 0.79–2.25, P = 0.29) and endoscopic reinterventions (OR 1.31, 95% CI 0.83–2.06, P = 0.25) were not significantly different between cohorts. Patients with decompensated cirrhosis had a significantly higher risk of post-EMR bleeding compared to controls (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.05–2.51, P = 0.03), whereas patients with compensated cirrhosis did not demonstrate an increased bleeding risk (OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.72–1.86, P = 0.55). Additionally, ICU admission, blood transfusion, and reintervention rates were not significantly different from controls in either group. Conclusion: This matched cohort study found increased rates of post-procedural bleeding and transfusion in cirrhotic patients undergoing EGD with EMR, primarily among those with decompensated disease. Compensated cirrhosis was not associated with higher complication rates. These results highlight the importance of optimizing coagulopathy and carefully planning the procedure in patients with decompensated cirrhosis.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.