S2329 Secondary Prophylaxis of SBP in Cirrhosis: Bactrim vs Ciprofloxacin in a Propensity-Matched Real-World Study

Introduction: Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is a common and life-threatening complication in patients with cirrhosis. Secondary prophylaxis with antibiotics such as trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (Bactrim) or ciprofloxacin is recommended to prevent recurrence. However, real-world comparative data on the efficacy of these regimens remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes among cirrhotic patients with prior SBP receiving Bactrim versus Ciprofloxacin for SBP prophylaxis. Methods: Using the TriNetX research network, we identified adult patients with cirrhosis and a documented episode of SBP who were prescribed either Bactrim (n = 11,166) or ciprofloxacin (n = 19,845) for secondary prophylaxis. After 1:1 propensity score matching based on demographics, liver function, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease components, diabetes status, hemoglobin A1c (A1c), and body mass index (BMI); 11,140 matched pairs were analyzed. Outcomes were assessed over a 3-year follow-up period using time-to-event analysis. The primary outcomes were recurrence of SBP and all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included all-cause hospitalizations, ascites, hepatic encephalopathy (HE), and variceal bleeding. Results: Patients receiving Bactrim had significantly better outcomes than those receiving Ciprofloxacin across nearly all measured endpoints. SBP recurrence was lower in the Bactrim group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.754, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.723–0.786; P < 0.0001), as was all-cause mortality (HR 0.838, 95% CI 0.804–0.874; P < 0.0001). Significant reductions were also observed in ascites (HR 0.863, 95% CI 0.835–0.891; P < 0.0001), HE (HR 0.786, 95% CI 0.744–0.830; P < 0.0001), and variceal bleeding (HR 0.813, 95% CI 0.731–0.903; P = 0.0001). There was a decrease in all-cause hospitalizations in the Bactrim group but there was no statistically significant difference. Conclusion: In this large real-world cohort of cirrhotic patients with prior SBP, Bactrim was associated with lower risks of SBP recurrence, mortality, incidence of ascites, HE, and variceal bleeding compared to Ciprofloxacin. While choice of antibiotic prophylaxis needs to be tailored based on individual and local antibiotic resistance profiles, our study showed that Bactrim may be a more effective option for SBP secondary prophylaxis in this population. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm these observations and guide clinical decision-making.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001136776.10891.39
Primary Topic
Liver Disease and Transplantation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S2329 Secondary Prophylaxis of SBP in Cirrhosis: Bactrim vs Ciprofloxacin in a Propensity-Matched Real-World Study

Walid Hazem, Leandro Sierra, Omar T. Sims, Mohamad-Noor Abu-Hammour et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Liver Disease and Transplantation
article

S2329 Secondary Prophylaxis of SBP in Cirrhosis: Bactrim vs Ciprofloxacin in a Propensity-Matched Real-World Study

Walid Hazem, Leandro Sierra, Omar T. Sims, Mohamad-Noor Abu-Hammour, Mohammed Osman, Dian Chiang
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is a common and life-threatening complication in patients with cirrhosis. Secondary prophylaxis with antibiotics such as trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (Bactrim) or ciprofloxacin is recommended to prevent recurrence. However, real-world comparative data on the efficacy of these regimens remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes among cirrhotic patients with prior SBP receiving Bactrim versus Ciprofloxacin for SBP prophylaxis. Methods: Using the TriNetX research network, we identified adult patients with cirrhosis and a documented episode of SBP who were prescribed either Bactrim (n = 11,166) or ciprofloxacin (n = 19,845) for secondary prophylaxis. After 1:1 propensity score matching based on demographics, liver function, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease components, diabetes status, hemoglobin A1c (A1c), and body mass index (BMI); 11,140 matched pairs were analyzed. Outcomes were assessed over a 3-year follow-up period using time-to-event analysis. The primary outcomes were recurrence of SBP and all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included all-cause hospitalizations, ascites, hepatic encephalopathy (HE), and variceal bleeding. Results: Patients receiving Bactrim had significantly better outcomes than those receiving Ciprofloxacin across nearly all measured endpoints. SBP recurrence was lower in the Bactrim group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.754, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.723–0.786; P < 0.0001), as was all-cause mortality (HR 0.838, 95% CI 0.804–0.874; P < 0.0001). Significant reductions were also observed in ascites (HR 0.863, 95% CI 0.835–0.891; P < 0.0001), HE (HR 0.786, 95% CI 0.744–0.830; P < 0.0001), and variceal bleeding (HR 0.813, 95% CI 0.731–0.903; P = 0.0001). There was a decrease in all-cause hospitalizations in the Bactrim group but there was no statistically significant difference. Conclusion: In this large real-world cohort of cirrhotic patients with prior SBP, Bactrim was associated with lower risks of SBP recurrence, mortality, incidence of ascites, HE, and variceal bleeding compared to Ciprofloxacin. While choice of antibiotic prophylaxis needs to be tailored based on individual and local antibiotic resistance profiles, our study showed that Bactrim may be a more effective option for SBP secondary prophylaxis in this population. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm these observations and guide clinical decision-making.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Liver Disease and Transplantation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.