S2331 Impact of MELD 3.0 on Gender Disparity in Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Transplantation in the US

Introduction: Female patients historically had longer waiting times and lower transplant rates in the waitlist compared to men for simultaneous liver and kidney transplantation (SLKT). Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) 3.0 (implemented in July 2023) is expected to reduce the gender disparity. Methods: We analyzed the real-world impact of MELD 3.0 on gender disparity for SLKT by comparing outcomes from Jan 2018 to June 2023 (T1 - pre-MELD 3.0) and from July 2023 to Sept 2024 (T2 - post-MELD 3.0) in the UNOS database. Results: A total of 73,738 patients listed for SLKT were included in the study after excluding retransplants. There were 3,404 men and 2,590 women in Group T1, and 551 and 485, respectively, in Group T2. Women were older at listing in Group T1 but had similar ages in Group T2. The ethnic distribution was similar between the 2 genders in both Groups. The etiology of cirrhosis was different, predominantly alcohol related in men and MASLD in women, in both Groups. Women had lower serum creatinine levels (at listing) in both Groups, P < 0.001. The median MELD at listing was higher for women in Group T2 (25 [20-31] vs 23 [20-29], P = 0.004), whereas it was the same in Group T1 (24 for both genders), P = 0.26. The distribution of SLK listings across UNOS regions did not reveal any gender disparity in either Group. The median waiting time for SLKT was similar in Group T1, whereas it was shorter for women in Group T2 (67 [14-170] vs 98 [16-210] days, P = 0.01). During the follow-up period, the number of patients receiving SLK was comparable in both genders in both groups (M/F 61.4%/60.4% in T1 and 51.7%/53.0% in T2). Similarly, the rates of patients delisted for improvement on the waitlist was comparable between the genders in both Groups. There were more deaths on the waitlist in both genders in Group T2 and more delisting due to deterioration in both genders in Group T2. Conclusion: Following the implementation of MELD 3.0, the median MELD at listing for SLKT became higher, and the wait time for SLKT became shorter in women. No gender disparity was noted in the receipt of SLKT and delisting due to improvement before or after implementation of MELD 3.0. Mortality on waitlist and delisting due to deterioration appear higher post-MELD 3.0 for both genders, with a higher occurrence of both outcomes in women. Longer-term follow-up is required to understand further the impact of MELD 3.0 on addressing gender disparity in the receipt of SLKT.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001136784.87573.df
Primary Topic
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S2331 Impact of MELD 3.0 on Gender Disparity in Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Transplantation in the US

Tamar H. Taddei, Ragesh B. Thandassery, Allison Wells, Suria Devarapalli
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
article

S2331 Impact of MELD 3.0 on Gender Disparity in Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Transplantation in the US

Tamar H. Taddei, Ragesh B. Thandassery, Allison Wells, Suria Devarapalli
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Female patients historically had longer waiting times and lower transplant rates in the waitlist compared to men for simultaneous liver and kidney transplantation (SLKT). Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) 3.0 (implemented in July 2023) is expected to reduce the gender disparity. Methods: We analyzed the real-world impact of MELD 3.0 on gender disparity for SLKT by comparing outcomes from Jan 2018 to June 2023 (T1 - pre-MELD 3.0) and from July 2023 to Sept 2024 (T2 - post-MELD 3.0) in the UNOS database. Results: A total of 73,738 patients listed for SLKT were included in the study after excluding retransplants. There were 3,404 men and 2,590 women in Group T1, and 551 and 485, respectively, in Group T2. Women were older at listing in Group T1 but had similar ages in Group T2. The ethnic distribution was similar between the 2 genders in both Groups. The etiology of cirrhosis was different, predominantly alcohol related in men and MASLD in women, in both Groups. Women had lower serum creatinine levels (at listing) in both Groups, P < 0.001. The median MELD at listing was higher for women in Group T2 (25 [20-31] vs 23 [20-29], P = 0.004), whereas it was the same in Group T1 (24 for both genders), P = 0.26. The distribution of SLK listings across UNOS regions did not reveal any gender disparity in either Group. The median waiting time for SLKT was similar in Group T1, whereas it was shorter for women in Group T2 (67 [14-170] vs 98 [16-210] days, P = 0.01). During the follow-up period, the number of patients receiving SLK was comparable in both genders in both groups (M/F 61.4%/60.4% in T1 and 51.7%/53.0% in T2). Similarly, the rates of patients delisted for improvement on the waitlist was comparable between the genders in both Groups. There were more deaths on the waitlist in both genders in Group T2 and more delisting due to deterioration in both genders in Group T2. Conclusion: Following the implementation of MELD 3.0, the median MELD at listing for SLKT became higher, and the wait time for SLKT became shorter in women. No gender disparity was noted in the receipt of SLKT and delisting due to improvement before or after implementation of MELD 3.0. Mortality on waitlist and delisting due to deterioration appear higher post-MELD 3.0 for both genders, with a higher occurrence of both outcomes in women. Longer-term follow-up is required to understand further the impact of MELD 3.0 on addressing gender disparity in the receipt of SLKT.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.