S2384 Colorectal Cancer Risk in MASLD: Evaluating Independent and Interactive Effects of Metabolic Traits

Introduction: As metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) becomes the most common liver disease worldwide, its extrahepatic consequences are increasingly under investigation. While colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality, the potential link between MASLD and colorectal cancer (CRC), particularly in the context of co-existing metabolic conditions, remains unclear. This study evaluates whether MASLD is independently associated with CRC and explores whether individual metabolic traits modify this association. Methods: This retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using the All of Us Research Program Dataset version 7, which includes both inpatient and outpatient records from a diverse, U.S.-based population. Adults with MASLD were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes, excluding those with other chronic liver conditions. Controls had no recorded liver disease diagnoses. Logistic regression was used to assess the association between MASLD and CRC, adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, smoking, and alcohol use. Interaction terms between MASLD and metabolic traits (diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, obesity) were included to test for effect modification. Results: We included 10,057 participants with MASLD and 313,151 matched controls. In the multivariable analysis, MASLD was independently associated with increased odds of CRC (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.82–2.61, P < 0.001). Increasing age, diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia were independently associated with higher CRC risk (all P < 0.001), while smoking and alcohol use were not significant. No significant interaction was observed between MASLD and any individual metabolic trait, including diabetes (P = 0.31), hypertension (P = 0.66), hyperlipidemia (P = 0.84), or obesity (P = 0.89), indicating these conditions did not modify the strength of the MASLD–CRC association. Conclusion: MASLD is associated with increased odds of CRC, independent of traditional metabolic risk factors. The absence of significant interaction effects suggests that MASLD confers CRC risk regardless of co-existing metabolic conditions. While metabolic traits such as diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia were independently associated with CRC, they did not significantly modify the association between MASLD and CRC. These findings support considering MASLD as a standalone CRC risk factor, highlighting the need to consider MASLD status in CRC risk models and future screening guidelines.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001136996.34588.8b
Primary Topic
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S2384 Colorectal Cancer Risk in MASLD: Evaluating Independent and Interactive Effects of Metabolic Traits

Viknesh Baskar, Sushil K. Ahlawat
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
article

S2384 Colorectal Cancer Risk in MASLD: Evaluating Independent and Interactive Effects of Metabolic Traits

Viknesh Baskar, Sushil K. Ahlawat
article en

Abstract

Introduction: As metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) becomes the most common liver disease worldwide, its extrahepatic consequences are increasingly under investigation. While colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality, the potential link between MASLD and colorectal cancer (CRC), particularly in the context of co-existing metabolic conditions, remains unclear. This study evaluates whether MASLD is independently associated with CRC and explores whether individual metabolic traits modify this association. Methods: This retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using the All of Us Research Program Dataset version 7, which includes both inpatient and outpatient records from a diverse, U.S.-based population. Adults with MASLD were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes, excluding those with other chronic liver conditions. Controls had no recorded liver disease diagnoses. Logistic regression was used to assess the association between MASLD and CRC, adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, smoking, and alcohol use. Interaction terms between MASLD and metabolic traits (diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, obesity) were included to test for effect modification. Results: We included 10,057 participants with MASLD and 313,151 matched controls. In the multivariable analysis, MASLD was independently associated with increased odds of CRC (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.82–2.61, P < 0.001). Increasing age, diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia were independently associated with higher CRC risk (all P < 0.001), while smoking and alcohol use were not significant. No significant interaction was observed between MASLD and any individual metabolic trait, including diabetes (P = 0.31), hypertension (P = 0.66), hyperlipidemia (P = 0.84), or obesity (P = 0.89), indicating these conditions did not modify the strength of the MASLD–CRC association. Conclusion: MASLD is associated with increased odds of CRC, independent of traditional metabolic risk factors. The absence of significant interaction effects suggests that MASLD confers CRC risk regardless of co-existing metabolic conditions. While metabolic traits such as diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia were independently associated with CRC, they did not significantly modify the association between MASLD and CRC. These findings support considering MASLD as a standalone CRC risk factor, highlighting the need to consider MASLD status in CRC risk models and future screening guidelines.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.