S2359 Beyond Varices: The Cardiovascular Impact of Non-Selective Beta-Blockers in Cirrhosis

Introduction: Patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension are at elevated cardiovascular risk due to systemic inflammation, autonomic imbalance, and hemodynamic alterations. Non-selective beta-blockers (NSBBs), routinely used to prevent variceal bleeding, may also influence cardiovascular outcomes. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis using the PRISMA guidelines. Literature searches were performed across PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library through February 2025 for studies assessing cardiovascular outcomes in adults with cirrhosis and clinically significant portal hypertension on long-term NSBB therapy (propranolol, nadolol, or carvedilol) versus no NSBBs. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiovascular death). Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization. Ten eligible studies (N = 18,612 patients), including 2 randomized controlled trials and 8 observational cohorts, were included. Data were pooled using a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was quantified using the I² statistic. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale for cohorts and the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool for RCTs. Results: Pooled analysis showed that NSBB use was associated with a statistically significant reduction in MACE (RR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.68–0.91; P = 0.001; I² = 41%) and all-cause mortality (RR = 0.83,95% CI: 0.74–0.94; P = 0.004; I² = 52%). No significant difference was observed in heart failure hospitalizations (RR = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.89–1.26; P = 0.51; I² = 35%). Subgroup analyses by age, MELD score, and diabetes status confirmed the cardioprotective trend. Sensitivity analyses and leave-one-out tests confirmed robustness. Funnel plot and Egger's test showed minimal publication bias. Conclusion: Our meta-analysis provides pooled evidence supporting the cardiovascular benefit of NSBBs in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. NSBBs are associated with a lower risk of MACE and mortality without increasing heart failure admissions. These findings suggest that NSBBs may serve a dual protective role—reducing both portal pressures and cardiovascular burden. While RCTs strengthen the conclusions, larger prospective trials remain necessary to confirm causality and guide practice.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001136896.47198.59
Primary Topic
Liver Disease and Transplantation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S2359 Beyond Varices: The Cardiovascular Impact of Non-Selective Beta-Blockers in Cirrhosis

Cherechi Nwabueze, Ooreoluwa Fasola, Chisom Nwaneki, Sarpong Boateng et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Liver Disease and Transplantation
article

S2359 Beyond Varices: The Cardiovascular Impact of Non-Selective Beta-Blockers in Cirrhosis

Cherechi Nwabueze, Ooreoluwa Fasola, Chisom Nwaneki, Sarpong Boateng, Elizabeth Soladoye, Abdul-Rahaman Adedolapo Ottun, Eunice Omeludike, Babajide Obidigbo, Sarah Acheampong, Eunice Aregbesola, Papa K.A. Beeko, Brice Njobe
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension are at elevated cardiovascular risk due to systemic inflammation, autonomic imbalance, and hemodynamic alterations. Non-selective beta-blockers (NSBBs), routinely used to prevent variceal bleeding, may also influence cardiovascular outcomes. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis using the PRISMA guidelines. Literature searches were performed across PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library through February 2025 for studies assessing cardiovascular outcomes in adults with cirrhosis and clinically significant portal hypertension on long-term NSBB therapy (propranolol, nadolol, or carvedilol) versus no NSBBs. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiovascular death). Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization. Ten eligible studies (N = 18,612 patients), including 2 randomized controlled trials and 8 observational cohorts, were included. Data were pooled using a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was quantified using the I² statistic. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale for cohorts and the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool for RCTs. Results: Pooled analysis showed that NSBB use was associated with a statistically significant reduction in MACE (RR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.68–0.91; P = 0.001; I² = 41%) and all-cause mortality (RR = 0.83,95% CI: 0.74–0.94; P = 0.004; I² = 52%). No significant difference was observed in heart failure hospitalizations (RR = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.89–1.26; P = 0.51; I² = 35%). Subgroup analyses by age, MELD score, and diabetes status confirmed the cardioprotective trend. Sensitivity analyses and leave-one-out tests confirmed robustness. Funnel plot and Egger's test showed minimal publication bias. Conclusion: Our meta-analysis provides pooled evidence supporting the cardiovascular benefit of NSBBs in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. NSBBs are associated with a lower risk of MACE and mortality without increasing heart failure admissions. These findings suggest that NSBBs may serve a dual protective role—reducing both portal pressures and cardiovascular burden. While RCTs strengthen the conclusions, larger prospective trials remain necessary to confirm causality and guide practice.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Liver Disease and Transplantation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.