S2366 Statin Use Is Associated With Slower MELD Progression in Liver Transplant Candidates

Introduction: Statins have demonstrated potential antifibrotic and anti-inflammatory effects in chronic liver disease, but their clinical impact during the peri transplant period remains uncertain. This study compares liver stiffness, hepatic steatosis, and MELD progression between statin users and non-users among adult liver transplant candidates. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included 4,906 adult liver transplant (LT) candidates listed between January 2000 and October 2023 at Cleveland Clinic (Ohio and Florida). Patients were stratified by statin use: statin users (n = 277, 5.6%) had active prescriptions for ≥60 days before and after listing, while non-users (n = 4,629, 94.4%) served as controls. Patients with acute liver failure or undergoing re-transplantation were excluded. The most recent liver stiffness (E_kpa) and hepatic steatosis (CAP) scores obtained via vibration-controlled transient elastography prior to listing were analyzed. MELD 3.0 scores at listing and transplant were used to calculate MELD progression. Demographic and clinical characteristics were extracted from structured documentation. Continuous variables were compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and categorical variables using Pearson’s chi-square test; statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05. Results: A total of 4,906 patients were included (277 statin users, 4,629 non-users). Statin users were older (median age 67 vs 63 years), had higher BMI (29.6 vs 27.8 kg/m²), and greater prevalence of diabetes (66.4% vs 35.4%), CAD (36.8% vs 9.6%), and CKD (27.4% vs 13.0%) compared to non-users (all P < 0.001). In addition to more comorbidities, statin users had significantly greater liver stiffness (median E_kpa 19.6 [IQR 7.6–33.4] vs 8.1 [5.4–17.2], P < 0.001) and CAP (287 vs 254 dB/m, P < 0.001). MELD scores at listing were similar (12.5 vs 12.1, P = 0.900), but MELD progression was significantly slower in statin users (median +9.9 [3.9–17.3] vs +14.8 [7.2–22.7], P < 0.001). Conclusion: In this large multicenter cohort, statin users exhibited more advanced fibrosis and greater comorbidity burden, yet experienced significantly slower MELD progression during the peri transplant period compared to non-users. These findings may suggest a potential protective role of statins in cirrhotic disease progression and supports further investigation of statins as a modifiable factor in liver transplant populations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001136924.37357.43
Primary Topic
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S2366 Statin Use Is Associated With Slower MELD Progression in Liver Transplant Candidates

Xaralambos Zervos, Victor Castro, Meeta Bhardwaj, Nicholas Ruthmann et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
article

S2366 Statin Use Is Associated With Slower MELD Progression in Liver Transplant Candidates

Xaralambos Zervos, Victor Castro, Meeta Bhardwaj, Nicholas Ruthmann, Omar T. Sims, Shilpa Junna, John McMichael, Rishaan R. Sharma, Kalyan Ram Bhamidimarri
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Statins have demonstrated potential antifibrotic and anti-inflammatory effects in chronic liver disease, but their clinical impact during the peri transplant period remains uncertain. This study compares liver stiffness, hepatic steatosis, and MELD progression between statin users and non-users among adult liver transplant candidates. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included 4,906 adult liver transplant (LT) candidates listed between January 2000 and October 2023 at Cleveland Clinic (Ohio and Florida). Patients were stratified by statin use: statin users (n = 277, 5.6%) had active prescriptions for ≥60 days before and after listing, while non-users (n = 4,629, 94.4%) served as controls. Patients with acute liver failure or undergoing re-transplantation were excluded. The most recent liver stiffness (E_kpa) and hepatic steatosis (CAP) scores obtained via vibration-controlled transient elastography prior to listing were analyzed. MELD 3.0 scores at listing and transplant were used to calculate MELD progression. Demographic and clinical characteristics were extracted from structured documentation. Continuous variables were compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and categorical variables using Pearson’s chi-square test; statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05. Results: A total of 4,906 patients were included (277 statin users, 4,629 non-users). Statin users were older (median age 67 vs 63 years), had higher BMI (29.6 vs 27.8 kg/m²), and greater prevalence of diabetes (66.4% vs 35.4%), CAD (36.8% vs 9.6%), and CKD (27.4% vs 13.0%) compared to non-users (all P < 0.001). In addition to more comorbidities, statin users had significantly greater liver stiffness (median E_kpa 19.6 [IQR 7.6–33.4] vs 8.1 [5.4–17.2], P < 0.001) and CAP (287 vs 254 dB/m, P < 0.001). MELD scores at listing were similar (12.5 vs 12.1, P = 0.900), but MELD progression was significantly slower in statin users (median +9.9 [3.9–17.3] vs +14.8 [7.2–22.7], P < 0.001). Conclusion: In this large multicenter cohort, statin users exhibited more advanced fibrosis and greater comorbidity burden, yet experienced significantly slower MELD progression during the peri transplant period compared to non-users. These findings may suggest a potential protective role of statins in cirrhotic disease progression and supports further investigation of statins as a modifiable factor in liver transplant populations.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.