US Views on New Vaccine Development and False Information After COVID-19

Vaccine innovations offer key tools to protect health, yet public views about vaccine development in the wake of COVID-19 are not well understood. We conducted a nationally representative survey of 1,632 US adults to examine public perceptions of vaccine development and false vaccine information that may shape views after the pandemic. The vast majority (81%) of adults thought vaccine development is "mostly a good thing," largely because vaccines protect the vulnerable and protect against severe illness (81% and 78%, respectively, among those who thought it was mostly a good thing). Most (78%) adults thought the spread of false vaccine information is a major problem, though few (26%) believed it is spread predominantly by people with bad intentions. Two-thirds (67%) said they had personally heard false information, but among those who gave examples, 31% provided statements that were about vaccines being beneficial, implying they believe vaccines are actually harmful. Findings suggest that public health leaders can build on largely positive public views of vaccine development, but should use caution when communicating about new vaccines and false information. It will be essential for leaders to acknowledge risks of new vaccines and avoid messages that seemingly denigrate people who might share false information.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Security
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23265094251399218
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

US Views on New Vaccine Development and False Information After COVID-19

Jazmyne Sutton, Alyssa Boyea, Gillian K. SteelFisher, Hannah L. Caporello et al.
Health Security
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
article

US Views on New Vaccine Development and False Information After COVID-19

Jazmyne Sutton, Alyssa Boyea, Gillian K. SteelFisher, Hannah L. Caporello, Laura Espino, Mary G. Findling
article en

Abstract

Vaccine innovations offer key tools to protect health, yet public views about vaccine development in the wake of COVID-19 are not well understood. We conducted a nationally representative survey of 1,632 US adults to examine public perceptions of vaccine development and false vaccine information that may shape views after the pandemic. The vast majority (81%) of adults thought vaccine development is "mostly a good thing," largely because vaccines protect the vulnerable and protect against severe illness (81% and 78%, respectively, among those who thought it was mostly a good thing). Most (78%) adults thought the spread of false vaccine information is a major problem, though few (26%) believed it is spread predominantly by people with bad intentions. Two-thirds (67%) said they had personally heard false information, but among those who gave examples, 31% provided statements that were about vaccines being beneficial, implying they believe vaccines are actually harmful. Findings suggest that public health leaders can build on largely positive public views of vaccine development, but should use caution when communicating about new vaccines and false information. It will be essential for leaders to acknowledge risks of new vaccines and avoid messages that seemingly denigrate people who might share false information.

Health SecurityVol. 23(6)
American Public Health Association (US), Marywood University (US), British Steel (United Kingdom) (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.