S2374 LSM in Patients With MASLD Using Hepatoscope Is Comparable to Fibroscan and Not Affected by BMI

Introduction: IIn obese patients, abdominal fat may affect the reliability of liver stiffness measurement (LSM) with FibroScanVCTE as studies show accuracy rates of 60% in populations with body mass index (BMI) >40. Ultrasound (US) is often required to find the best location for LSM, extending time and cost. Screening of patients with metabolic-dysfunction associated liver disease (MASLD) could benefit from a portable US imaging system with associated transient elastography (TE) to risk-stratify liver fibrosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate Hepatoscope (E-scopics Inc.) a 2D-US portable device with associated TE in patients with MASLD at differing BMI levels, and to assess its non-inferiority as compared to FibroScan (Echosens Inc). Methods: From August to December 2024, 174 MASLD patients scheduled for FibroScan exam at Mercy Medical Center were enrolled in this prospective study. The patients underwent a second exam with Hepatoscope 2DTE (v2.1.5). LSMVCTE was valid if there were 10 or more exams with interquartile range/median ratio below 30%, LSMVCTE and LSM2DTE were compared by a Mann-Whitney test, Spearman’s correlation with a Deming regression model. Impact of BMI on both LSMVCTE and LSM2DTE was assessed. Results: One hundred seventy-four patients were evaluated using both tests. Baseline demographics included median age 59.0 [48.3-67.0], BMI 30.82 [26.99-35.45], 97 (53.8%) woman, 99 (55.0%) had BMI >30 with 20 (11.6%) with BMI >40. 102 (56.7%) had type 2 diabetes. Distributions of LSM2DTE and LSMVCTE were not significantly different (5.4 kPa [4.4-7.7] and 6.1 kPa [4.6-9.0], respectively). They both correlated strongly (r = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.5532-0.7281) and there was no significant bias. LSMVCTE had a weak but significant trend to increase with BMI (r = 0.2633 95% CI: 0.1149-0.4003, P = 0.0004) and patients with severe obesity (BMI >40 kg/m²) had higher LSMVCTE (P = 0.011). This was not observed with Hepatoscope where LSM2DTE measurements were found to be independent of BMI. Conclusion: Hepatoscope is a solution for the accurate assessment of LSM in MASLD patients, combining TE and 2D-US imaging, that is FDA approved with CPT codes for billing. Our study demonstrated that Hepatoscope results are non-inferior to FibroScan for LSM assessment. LSM2DTE measurements were independent of BMI, potentially addressing the limitations of other devices. Hepatoscope may offer additional advantages over FibroScan due to its portability and integrated 2D imaging capability.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001136956.06981.df
Primary Topic
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S2374 LSM in Patients With MASLD Using Hepatoscope Is Comparable to Fibroscan and Not Affected by BMI

Kristin Lescalleet, Anurag Maheshwari, Braden Thomas, Cindy Serdjebi et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
article

S2374 LSM in Patients With MASLD Using Hepatoscope Is Comparable to Fibroscan and Not Affected by BMI

Kristin Lescalleet, Anurag Maheshwari, Braden Thomas, Cindy Serdjebi, Mauricio Lema, Paul J. Thuluvath, Joel Gay
article en

Abstract

Introduction: IIn obese patients, abdominal fat may affect the reliability of liver stiffness measurement (LSM) with FibroScanVCTE as studies show accuracy rates of 60% in populations with body mass index (BMI) >40. Ultrasound (US) is often required to find the best location for LSM, extending time and cost. Screening of patients with metabolic-dysfunction associated liver disease (MASLD) could benefit from a portable US imaging system with associated transient elastography (TE) to risk-stratify liver fibrosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate Hepatoscope (E-scopics Inc.) a 2D-US portable device with associated TE in patients with MASLD at differing BMI levels, and to assess its non-inferiority as compared to FibroScan (Echosens Inc). Methods: From August to December 2024, 174 MASLD patients scheduled for FibroScan exam at Mercy Medical Center were enrolled in this prospective study. The patients underwent a second exam with Hepatoscope 2DTE (v2.1.5). LSMVCTE was valid if there were 10 or more exams with interquartile range/median ratio below 30%, LSMVCTE and LSM2DTE were compared by a Mann-Whitney test, Spearman’s correlation with a Deming regression model. Impact of BMI on both LSMVCTE and LSM2DTE was assessed. Results: One hundred seventy-four patients were evaluated using both tests. Baseline demographics included median age 59.0 [48.3-67.0], BMI 30.82 [26.99-35.45], 97 (53.8%) woman, 99 (55.0%) had BMI >30 with 20 (11.6%) with BMI >40. 102 (56.7%) had type 2 diabetes. Distributions of LSM2DTE and LSMVCTE were not significantly different (5.4 kPa [4.4-7.7] and 6.1 kPa [4.6-9.0], respectively). They both correlated strongly (r = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.5532-0.7281) and there was no significant bias. LSMVCTE had a weak but significant trend to increase with BMI (r = 0.2633 95% CI: 0.1149-0.4003, P = 0.0004) and patients with severe obesity (BMI >40 kg/m²) had higher LSMVCTE (P = 0.011). This was not observed with Hepatoscope where LSM2DTE measurements were found to be independent of BMI. Conclusion: Hepatoscope is a solution for the accurate assessment of LSM in MASLD patients, combining TE and 2D-US imaging, that is FDA approved with CPT codes for billing. Our study demonstrated that Hepatoscope results are non-inferior to FibroScan for LSM assessment. LSM2DTE measurements were independent of BMI, potentially addressing the limitations of other devices. Hepatoscope may offer additional advantages over FibroScan due to its portability and integrated 2D imaging capability.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.