S2372 Socioeconomic Disparities in Hepatitis C: Higher Treatment Success Among Low SES Patients Despite Barriers to Access

Introduction: Chronic hepatitis C affects around an estimated 2.2 million adults in the US, with 93,805 new cases reported in 2022. States with higher poverty levels report the highest cases per capita, with Oklahoma having the highest rate at 150 cases per 100,000 people and a poverty rate of 15.27%, the ninth highest in the US. Since the development of curative treatment in 2013, studies have demonstrated that socioeconomic status (SES) influences access to hepatitis C treatment, resulting in lower resolution rates among the impoverished. However, this study aims to investigate if low SES negatively impacts the sustained viremic response of hepatitis C after initiating treatment once barriers to access are resolved. Methods: TriNetX was used to identify patients with chronic hepatitis C in the United States who received antiviral HCV medications during their disease course. Patients were categorized into low or middle/high SES groups based on documented problems related to housing, economic circumstances, and employment. Demographics, including sex, race, and ethnicity, were also analyzed. Sustained virologic response (SVR) was calculated for each group as the primary outcome. Results: A cohort of 103,535 patients across 68 healthcare organizations were identified as living with chronic hepatitis C taking antiviral medications, with 8,283 (8.0%) categorized as low SES. Among all patients treated with antiviral medications, only 45,088 (43.5%) achieved documented SVR. Despite having less access to antiviral therapy, low SES patients achieved a significantly higher SVR rate (49.1%) compared to middle/high SES patients (43.1%, P < 0.001). Among races, this was only reflected in African Americans (P < 0.001), while Whites, Asians, and Native Americans of middle/high SES had higher rates of SVR (P < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between sex and ethnicity (P > 0.05). Conclusion: While it is established that individuals of lower SES are disproportionately affected by hepatitis C and face barriers to accessing antiviral medications, this study highlights a lesser-explored area: whether SES impacts the likelihood of treatment success once access is achieved. Interestingly, those of low SES demonstrated a higher likelihood of achieving SVR compared to middle/high SES patients, particularly among African Americans. This finding warrants further exploration to identify potential reasons and supports prioritizing funding for public health programs aimed at hepatitis C eradication.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001136948.76341.33
Primary Topic
Hepatitis C virus research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S2372 Socioeconomic Disparities in Hepatitis C: Higher Treatment Success Among Low SES Patients Despite Barriers to Access

Adrian Lindsey, Morgan R. Starkey
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Hepatitis C virus research
article

S2372 Socioeconomic Disparities in Hepatitis C: Higher Treatment Success Among Low SES Patients Despite Barriers to Access

Adrian Lindsey, Morgan R. Starkey
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Chronic hepatitis C affects around an estimated 2.2 million adults in the US, with 93,805 new cases reported in 2022. States with higher poverty levels report the highest cases per capita, with Oklahoma having the highest rate at 150 cases per 100,000 people and a poverty rate of 15.27%, the ninth highest in the US. Since the development of curative treatment in 2013, studies have demonstrated that socioeconomic status (SES) influences access to hepatitis C treatment, resulting in lower resolution rates among the impoverished. However, this study aims to investigate if low SES negatively impacts the sustained viremic response of hepatitis C after initiating treatment once barriers to access are resolved. Methods: TriNetX was used to identify patients with chronic hepatitis C in the United States who received antiviral HCV medications during their disease course. Patients were categorized into low or middle/high SES groups based on documented problems related to housing, economic circumstances, and employment. Demographics, including sex, race, and ethnicity, were also analyzed. Sustained virologic response (SVR) was calculated for each group as the primary outcome. Results: A cohort of 103,535 patients across 68 healthcare organizations were identified as living with chronic hepatitis C taking antiviral medications, with 8,283 (8.0%) categorized as low SES. Among all patients treated with antiviral medications, only 45,088 (43.5%) achieved documented SVR. Despite having less access to antiviral therapy, low SES patients achieved a significantly higher SVR rate (49.1%) compared to middle/high SES patients (43.1%, P < 0.001). Among races, this was only reflected in African Americans (P < 0.001), while Whites, Asians, and Native Americans of middle/high SES had higher rates of SVR (P < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between sex and ethnicity (P > 0.05). Conclusion: While it is established that individuals of lower SES are disproportionately affected by hepatitis C and face barriers to accessing antiviral medications, this study highlights a lesser-explored area: whether SES impacts the likelihood of treatment success once access is achieved. Interestingly, those of low SES demonstrated a higher likelihood of achieving SVR compared to middle/high SES patients, particularly among African Americans. This finding warrants further exploration to identify potential reasons and supports prioritizing funding for public health programs aimed at hepatitis C eradication.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Hepatitis C virus research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.