Residential wood smoke: perceptions, health risks, and mitigating exposures

Almost one in five (19%) Canadian households rely on wood stoves or fireplaces as primary or supplemental sources of heating and cooking, and the emissions from these devices are an often overlooked source of air pollution. Residential wood burning produces the same amount of fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) as the transportation and industrial sectors combined across Canada. Exposure to wood smoke can have serious acute and chronic health effects, ranging from symptoms such as headaches, nausea, dizziness, and irritation of the eyes, nose, throat, and lungs, to an increased risk of developing chronic conditions like heart and lung diseases. Although efforts to reduce exposure by replacing old, high-emission wood stoves through education and incentives have been implemented in many jurisdictions across Canada, many of these heavily polluting devices are still regularly in use. In British Columbia alone, only 67% of fireplace inserts and 65% of wood-burning stoves are certified as low-emission. This paper examines the evidence on the disconnect between what people believe about residential wood smoke, and what is actually measured, along with the resulting health risks. We also examined current interventions, good burn practices, and jurisdictional regulations aimed at reducing indoor and outdoor wood smoke exposures. Perceptions of wood smoke were found to be inconsistent with estimated health burdens, and implementation of interventions to reduce wood smoke emissions varied greatly across jurisdictions. However, wood burning still represents the only source of energy for many Canadian households, and adaptive strategies are needed to mitigate health risks.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Health Review
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5864/d2025-020
Primary Topic
Air Quality and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Residential wood smoke: perceptions, health risks, and mitigating exposures

Ryan D. Huff
Environmental Health Review
Air Quality and Health Impacts
article

Residential wood smoke: perceptions, health risks, and mitigating exposures

Ryan D. Huff
article en

Abstract

Almost one in five (19%) Canadian households rely on wood stoves or fireplaces as primary or supplemental sources of heating and cooking, and the emissions from these devices are an often overlooked source of air pollution. Residential wood burning produces the same amount of fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) as the transportation and industrial sectors combined across Canada. Exposure to wood smoke can have serious acute and chronic health effects, ranging from symptoms such as headaches, nausea, dizziness, and irritation of the eyes, nose, throat, and lungs, to an increased risk of developing chronic conditions like heart and lung diseases. Although efforts to reduce exposure by replacing old, high-emission wood stoves through education and incentives have been implemented in many jurisdictions across Canada, many of these heavily polluting devices are still regularly in use. In British Columbia alone, only 67% of fireplace inserts and 65% of wood-burning stoves are certified as low-emission. This paper examines the evidence on the disconnect between what people believe about residential wood smoke, and what is actually measured, along with the resulting health risks. We also examined current interventions, good burn practices, and jurisdictional regulations aimed at reducing indoor and outdoor wood smoke exposures. Perceptions of wood smoke were found to be inconsistent with estimated health burdens, and implementation of interventions to reduce wood smoke emissions varied greatly across jurisdictions. However, wood burning still represents the only source of energy for many Canadian households, and adaptive strategies are needed to mitigate health risks.

Environmental Health ReviewVol. 68(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Air Quality and Health Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.