S2312 No July Effect on Timing of ERCP for Acute Cholangitis in Teaching Hospitals

Introduction: Early recognition and drainage with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) can reduce complications from acute cholangitis. The transition of medical trainees at the beginning of the academic year, known as the 'July effect', has been associated with worse clinical outcomes in various conditions, but it has not been thoroughly studied in patients with acute cholangitis. In this study, we assessed the July effect on the timing of ERCP for patients with acute cholangitis admitted to teaching hospitals. Methods: We analyzed retrospective data from the 2016 to 2020 iterations of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS). We included adult admissions to teaching hospitals for acute cholangitis between May and September. The primary outcome was the timing of ERCP, categorized as urgent (within ≤48 hours) vs non-urgent (>48 hours). The primary variable of interest was the month of admission: May to June vs July to September. We described the study population characteristics using chi-squared tests and examined the relationship between the month of admission and ERCP timing using multivariable logistic regression. Results: The study included 2,436 patients, with 48.8% (1,325) admitted between April and June and 51.2% (1,247) between July and September. Most patients were woman (54.5%), White (70.4%), at least 65 years old (64.1%), and admitted to large hospitals (55.6%). The majority (84.6%) underwent ERCP within 48 hours of admission. After adjusting for covariates, there was no significant difference in ERCP timing based on the month of admission [OR 0.99, 95% CI (0.76, 1.29)]. Patients with comorbid illnesses and those admitted during the weekend [OR 0.62, 95% CI (0.46, 0.83)] were however less likely to undergo urgent ERCP. Conclusion: Delays in timely ERCP are associated with worse clinical outcomes. Our study found no difference in ERCP timing (urgent vs non-urgent) by time of year in teaching hospitals. In patients with comorbid illness, procedure delay may be warranted. The weekend effect on urgent ERCP has been noted, but its impact on mortality requires further evaluation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001136708.86989.23
Primary Topic
Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S2312 No July Effect on Timing of ERCP for Acute Cholangitis in Teaching Hospitals

Seunghee Han, Boniface Mensah, Joseph Atarere, Kevin Eid et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
article

S2312 No July Effect on Timing of ERCP for Acute Cholangitis in Teaching Hospitals

Seunghee Han, Boniface Mensah, Joseph Atarere, Kevin Eid, Chisom Nwaneki, Sarpong Boateng, Eugene Annor, Christopher Thompson, Michele Ryan
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Early recognition and drainage with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) can reduce complications from acute cholangitis. The transition of medical trainees at the beginning of the academic year, known as the 'July effect', has been associated with worse clinical outcomes in various conditions, but it has not been thoroughly studied in patients with acute cholangitis. In this study, we assessed the July effect on the timing of ERCP for patients with acute cholangitis admitted to teaching hospitals. Methods: We analyzed retrospective data from the 2016 to 2020 iterations of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS). We included adult admissions to teaching hospitals for acute cholangitis between May and September. The primary outcome was the timing of ERCP, categorized as urgent (within ≤48 hours) vs non-urgent (>48 hours). The primary variable of interest was the month of admission: May to June vs July to September. We described the study population characteristics using chi-squared tests and examined the relationship between the month of admission and ERCP timing using multivariable logistic regression. Results: The study included 2,436 patients, with 48.8% (1,325) admitted between April and June and 51.2% (1,247) between July and September. Most patients were woman (54.5%), White (70.4%), at least 65 years old (64.1%), and admitted to large hospitals (55.6%). The majority (84.6%) underwent ERCP within 48 hours of admission. After adjusting for covariates, there was no significant difference in ERCP timing based on the month of admission [OR 0.99, 95% CI (0.76, 1.29)]. Patients with comorbid illnesses and those admitted during the weekend [OR 0.62, 95% CI (0.46, 0.83)] were however less likely to undergo urgent ERCP. Conclusion: Delays in timely ERCP are associated with worse clinical outcomes. Our study found no difference in ERCP timing (urgent vs non-urgent) by time of year in teaching hospitals. In patients with comorbid illness, procedure delay may be warranted. The weekend effect on urgent ERCP has been noted, but its impact on mortality requires further evaluation.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.