S2313 Efficacy of Intra-Gastric Balloon versus Intra-Gastric Balloon and Anti-Obesity Medications for Weight Loss: A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis

Introduction: Intra-gastric balloons (IGB) are synthetic balloons placed in the stomach to help patients with obesity to achieve weight loss. While multiple studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of IGBs alone, the potential benefits of combining IGBs with anti-obesity medications (AOM) remain understudied. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and a meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of IGB versus IGB + anti-obesity medications (AOM) on weight loss. Methods: Bibliographic databases (PubMed, Medline, Embase) were systematically searched for studies assessing the impact of IGB versus IGB + AOM on weight loss. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing these interventions were included and analyzed using the Inverse variance method and Random-effects model. Results: Four studies containing 309 patients were included (2 observational studies and 2 RCTs). Patients in both groups were instructed about lifestyle modifications. The follow-up period was 6 months for most studies, except Farina et al. (2012) which followed patients for 12 months. The primary outcome was the weight loss difference between the IGB + AOM group versus the IGB group which was measured as Mean Difference (MD). IGB + AOM resulted in significantly greater weight loss, with a mean difference of 4.05 kg (95% CI [1.52, 6.57], P = 0.002) compared to IGB alone. Subgroup analysis by age showed consistent results favoring IGB + AOM: patients <35 years achieved an additional weight loss of 5.93 kg (95% CI [1.63, 10.22], P = 0.007), while patients >35 years achieved an additional weight loss of 1.80 kg (95% CI [1.20, 2.39], P < 0.00001). Conclusion: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, adding anti-obesity medications to IGB treatment resulted in significantly greater weight loss compared to IGB alone.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001136712.84474.c1
Primary Topic
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S2313 Efficacy of Intra-Gastric Balloon versus Intra-Gastric Balloon and Anti-Obesity Medications for Weight Loss: A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis

Carolyn Newberry, Chino Aneke-Nash, Zane Gouda, Kartik Sampath et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
article

S2313 Efficacy of Intra-Gastric Balloon versus Intra-Gastric Balloon and Anti-Obesity Medications for Weight Loss: A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis

Carolyn Newberry, Chino Aneke-Nash, Zane Gouda, Kartik Sampath, David L. Carr‐Locke, Mark Hanscom, Ali Lahooti, SriHari Mahadev, Shelby Sullivan, Kate E. Johnson, Muhammad Usman Baig, Hakan Gelincik, Sean Rangwani, Reem Z. Sharaiha, Samira M. Haddad, Zuhair Osamah Zuhair Al-Bakaeen, Mohannad Bisher Zuhair Al-Bakain
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Intra-gastric balloons (IGB) are synthetic balloons placed in the stomach to help patients with obesity to achieve weight loss. While multiple studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of IGBs alone, the potential benefits of combining IGBs with anti-obesity medications (AOM) remain understudied. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and a meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of IGB versus IGB + anti-obesity medications (AOM) on weight loss. Methods: Bibliographic databases (PubMed, Medline, Embase) were systematically searched for studies assessing the impact of IGB versus IGB + AOM on weight loss. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing these interventions were included and analyzed using the Inverse variance method and Random-effects model. Results: Four studies containing 309 patients were included (2 observational studies and 2 RCTs). Patients in both groups were instructed about lifestyle modifications. The follow-up period was 6 months for most studies, except Farina et al. (2012) which followed patients for 12 months. The primary outcome was the weight loss difference between the IGB + AOM group versus the IGB group which was measured as Mean Difference (MD). IGB + AOM resulted in significantly greater weight loss, with a mean difference of 4.05 kg (95% CI [1.52, 6.57], P = 0.002) compared to IGB alone. Subgroup analysis by age showed consistent results favoring IGB + AOM: patients <35 years achieved an additional weight loss of 5.93 kg (95% CI [1.63, 10.22], P = 0.007), while patients >35 years achieved an additional weight loss of 1.80 kg (95% CI [1.20, 2.39], P < 0.00001). Conclusion: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, adding anti-obesity medications to IGB treatment resulted in significantly greater weight loss compared to IGB alone.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.