S2234 Shorter Pouch Length Predicts Reintervention After TORe for Weight Regain Post-Gastric Bypass

Introduction: Transoral outlet reduction (TORe) is safe and effective in the management of weight recidivism after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). A subset of patients develops a recurrence of outlet dilatation, leading to an inadequate response to the initial procedure or weight regain. Although repeat TORe often yields successful outcomes, the factors causing the initial failure are not well understood. Methods: This is a single-center, retrospective study from a large endobariatric clinic, enrolling adult patients who required repeated TORe for weight regain after the index intervention. A matched group of patients who did not undergo a repeated TORe was included for comparison. All patients were followed for at least 1 year post-intervention. Demographic, clinical, and procedural factors were assessed using Welch’s T-test, Fisher’s exact test, and multivariate logistic regression. Results: Twenty-3 patients were evaluated: 9 underwent repeat TORe, and 14 did not. The mean age was 54 years, and 96% were woman. The median pouch length was 5 cm (IQR: 4–7), and the mean number of sutures placed was 2 ± 1.56. Shorter pouch length was associated with increased odds of reintervention (OR = 0.32; 95% CI: 0.08–0.73; P = 0.032). Specifically, each 1-cm decrease in pouch length was associated with a 73% increase in the odds of repeat TORe (OR = 0.27; 95% CI: 0.06–1.22; P = 0.089). A higher number of sutures was also associated with greater odds of reintervention (OR = 3.82; 95% CI: 1.33–19.08; P = 0.0454). Notably, none of the 4 patients treated with the TORe-Zipper technique required reintervention, significantly lower than other techniques (P = 0.048), No significant associations were observed between reintervention and gastric outlet diameter, time from RYGB to TORe, or diabetes status. On multivariate analysis, pouch length remained an independent predictor (OR = 0.33; P = 0.0011), and suture count continued to predict reintervention (OR = 12.7; P = 0.0054). Conclusion: In this retrospective cohort, shorter pouch length was significantly associated with an increased likelihood of repeat endoscopic intervention for weight recidivism following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Pouch length remained an independent predictor in multivariate analysis. Among TORe techniques, the APC-based approach was more frequently associated with reintervention, while the Zipper technique was not.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001136396.86377.b8
Primary Topic
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S2234 Shorter Pouch Length Predicts Reintervention After TORe for Weight Regain Post-Gastric Bypass

Eric R. Simms, Elizza E. Villarruel, V. Raman Muthusamy, Adarsh M. Thaker et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
article

S2234 Shorter Pouch Length Predicts Reintervention After TORe for Weight Regain Post-Gastric Bypass

Eric R. Simms, Elizza E. Villarruel, V. Raman Muthusamy, Adarsh M. Thaker, Danny Issa, María I. Ramirez, Vidhi Singh, Jose Garcia-Corella, Meghna Yalamanchi, Kelsy Larios, Cameron M. Quon
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Transoral outlet reduction (TORe) is safe and effective in the management of weight recidivism after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). A subset of patients develops a recurrence of outlet dilatation, leading to an inadequate response to the initial procedure or weight regain. Although repeat TORe often yields successful outcomes, the factors causing the initial failure are not well understood. Methods: This is a single-center, retrospective study from a large endobariatric clinic, enrolling adult patients who required repeated TORe for weight regain after the index intervention. A matched group of patients who did not undergo a repeated TORe was included for comparison. All patients were followed for at least 1 year post-intervention. Demographic, clinical, and procedural factors were assessed using Welch’s T-test, Fisher’s exact test, and multivariate logistic regression. Results: Twenty-3 patients were evaluated: 9 underwent repeat TORe, and 14 did not. The mean age was 54 years, and 96% were woman. The median pouch length was 5 cm (IQR: 4–7), and the mean number of sutures placed was 2 ± 1.56. Shorter pouch length was associated with increased odds of reintervention (OR = 0.32; 95% CI: 0.08–0.73; P = 0.032). Specifically, each 1-cm decrease in pouch length was associated with a 73% increase in the odds of repeat TORe (OR = 0.27; 95% CI: 0.06–1.22; P = 0.089). A higher number of sutures was also associated with greater odds of reintervention (OR = 3.82; 95% CI: 1.33–19.08; P = 0.0454). Notably, none of the 4 patients treated with the TORe-Zipper technique required reintervention, significantly lower than other techniques (P = 0.048), No significant associations were observed between reintervention and gastric outlet diameter, time from RYGB to TORe, or diabetes status. On multivariate analysis, pouch length remained an independent predictor (OR = 0.33; P = 0.0011), and suture count continued to predict reintervention (OR = 12.7; P = 0.0054). Conclusion: In this retrospective cohort, shorter pouch length was significantly associated with an increased likelihood of repeat endoscopic intervention for weight recidivism following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Pouch length remained an independent predictor in multivariate analysis. Among TORe techniques, the APC-based approach was more frequently associated with reintervention, while the Zipper technique was not.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.