S2196 How Many Dilations Are Too Many? A Meta-Analysis of Endoscopic Balloon Dilation Outcomes and Surgical Conversion in Gastric Sleeve Stenosis

Introduction: Gastric sleeve stenosis (GSS) is a recognized complication following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), often resulting in nausea, vomiting, and oral intolerance. Endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) is the first-line therapeutic option, yet the number of sessions required for symptom resolution and the threshold for considering surgical conversion remain unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis that evaluates the efficacy of EBD, and the rates of escalation to stenting or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Methods: We performed a systematic review of PubMed, Ovid, Cochrane and Google Scholar to identify studies reporting EBD in adult patients with GSS post-LSG. Primary outcomes were clinical success, mean number of dilations, recurrence, and need for further interventions such as endoscopic stenting or RYGB. Pooled outcomes were calculated using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic. Results: Twenty-six studies comprising 948 patients (83.5% women) were included. The pooled clinical success rate of EBD was 81.6% (95% CI: 72.93–88.92), with a mean of 1.78 dilation sessions (95% CI: 1.63–1.92) required for resolution. Despite initial success, recurrence/restenosis occurred in 21.97%. 17.52% required reintervention with a different modality which included stent placement (8.93%; success rate: 67.08%) or RYGB (10.79%, success rate: 100%). Adverse events were rare at a pooled rate of 5.6%, including perforation (0.53%) and life-threatening bleeding (0.24%). Conclusion: Most patients with GSS respond to one or 2 EBD sessions, with diminishing returns from additional dilations. Recurrence and reintervention remain common, suggesting that persistent symptoms beyond 2 dilation attempts may warrant early consideration of stenting or surgical conversion. These findings offer a practical framework for when to escalate therapy in the management of post-LSG sleeve stenosis.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001136244.51594.56
Primary Topic
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S2196 How Many Dilations Are Too Many? A Meta-Analysis of Endoscopic Balloon Dilation Outcomes and Surgical Conversion in Gastric Sleeve Stenosis

Sanjeevani Tomar, Babu P. Mohan, Rabindra Watson, Tony Brar et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
article

S2196 How Many Dilations Are Too Many? A Meta-Analysis of Endoscopic Balloon Dilation Outcomes and Surgical Conversion in Gastric Sleeve Stenosis

Sanjeevani Tomar, Babu P. Mohan, Rabindra Watson, Tony Brar, Yaseen Perbtani, Nihal I. Khan, Harsimran Kalsi, Yeshika Thapa, Kobina Essilfie‐Quaye, Rashmi Advani, Rahul Karna, Hassam Ali
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Gastric sleeve stenosis (GSS) is a recognized complication following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), often resulting in nausea, vomiting, and oral intolerance. Endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) is the first-line therapeutic option, yet the number of sessions required for symptom resolution and the threshold for considering surgical conversion remain unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis that evaluates the efficacy of EBD, and the rates of escalation to stenting or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Methods: We performed a systematic review of PubMed, Ovid, Cochrane and Google Scholar to identify studies reporting EBD in adult patients with GSS post-LSG. Primary outcomes were clinical success, mean number of dilations, recurrence, and need for further interventions such as endoscopic stenting or RYGB. Pooled outcomes were calculated using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic. Results: Twenty-six studies comprising 948 patients (83.5% women) were included. The pooled clinical success rate of EBD was 81.6% (95% CI: 72.93–88.92), with a mean of 1.78 dilation sessions (95% CI: 1.63–1.92) required for resolution. Despite initial success, recurrence/restenosis occurred in 21.97%. 17.52% required reintervention with a different modality which included stent placement (8.93%; success rate: 67.08%) or RYGB (10.79%, success rate: 100%). Adverse events were rare at a pooled rate of 5.6%, including perforation (0.53%) and life-threatening bleeding (0.24%). Conclusion: Most patients with GSS respond to one or 2 EBD sessions, with diminishing returns from additional dilations. Recurrence and reintervention remain common, suggesting that persistent symptoms beyond 2 dilation attempts may warrant early consideration of stenting or surgical conversion. These findings offer a practical framework for when to escalate therapy in the management of post-LSG sleeve stenosis.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.