S2202 The Safety of Peri-ERCP Rectal Prophylactic Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) in Patients With Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease (GFR <30)

Introduction: Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP) is a common and serious complication of ERCP. Rectal nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) like indomethacin and diclofenac are widely used for prophylaxis due to their anti-inflammatory effects. However, their use in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) raises concerns about nephrotoxicity with a risk of acute kidney injury (AKI). Real-world data on the safety of NSAID use in CKD stages 4–5 in the context of endoscopic procedures is limited. We aimed to assess and weigh the renal safety with the incidence of AKI following NSAIDs use vs the prophylactic benefit of protecting against PEP in advanced CKD patients. Methods: Utilizing the TriNetX US Collaborative Network, we identified CKD stage 4 and 5 patients (with GFR <30, excluding those on dialysis/renal replacement therapy) who underwent ERCP and received rectal NSAIDs prophylaxis during the procedure, and compared them to another matched group of CKD patients who underwent ERCP and did not receive prophylaxis. The primary outcome was the development of AKI following the ERCP. Secondary outcomes included PEP, gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB), ICU admission, acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP), sepsis, intubation, and mortality. We matched the groups based on baseline characteristics, co-morbidities, and pertinent medications that increase the risk of kidney injury (including diuretics, ACEi, ARBs, etc.) to rule out potential confounders. Results: A total of 1,490 patients with CKD stages 4 or 5 received NSAIDs and 3,773 patients who did not were identified before propensity score matching, all of whom underwent ERCP. After matching, each group included 1,470 patients with comparable baseline characteristics. There was no significant difference in the incidence of AKI between both groups (13% vs 12%, P = 0.243). However, PEP was less common in the NSAID group (8% vs 10%, P = 0.027). There was no difference in rates of GIB, intubation, sepsis, or mortality. Notably, ANP occurred only in the non-NSAIDs group (0% vs 0.7%, P = 0.002). Conclusion: In patients with advanced CKD (GFR <30) undergoing ERCP, NSAIDs were not linked to higher risks of AKI, GI bleeding, or mortality; they were associated with lower PEP risk. These findings suggest that, with appropriate patient selection, NSAIDs may be safely used in this high risk patient population for single doses.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001136268.30009.e3
Primary Topic
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S2202 The Safety of Peri-ERCP Rectal Prophylactic Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) in Patients With Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease (GFR <30)

Khaled Elfert, Mona A. Ali, Mohamed Eldesouki, Azizullah Beran et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
article

S2202 The Safety of Peri-ERCP Rectal Prophylactic Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) in Patients With Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease (GFR <30)

Khaled Elfert, Mona A. Ali, Mohamed Eldesouki, Azizullah Beran, Mark A. Gromski, Sherif Elhanafi, Hazem Abosheaishaa, Ahmed Salem, Amr Abusuliman, Mohammed Y. Youssef, Anas A. Elsaka, Mohammed Abusuliman, Jonathan A. Montrose
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP) is a common and serious complication of ERCP. Rectal nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) like indomethacin and diclofenac are widely used for prophylaxis due to their anti-inflammatory effects. However, their use in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) raises concerns about nephrotoxicity with a risk of acute kidney injury (AKI). Real-world data on the safety of NSAID use in CKD stages 4–5 in the context of endoscopic procedures is limited. We aimed to assess and weigh the renal safety with the incidence of AKI following NSAIDs use vs the prophylactic benefit of protecting against PEP in advanced CKD patients. Methods: Utilizing the TriNetX US Collaborative Network, we identified CKD stage 4 and 5 patients (with GFR <30, excluding those on dialysis/renal replacement therapy) who underwent ERCP and received rectal NSAIDs prophylaxis during the procedure, and compared them to another matched group of CKD patients who underwent ERCP and did not receive prophylaxis. The primary outcome was the development of AKI following the ERCP. Secondary outcomes included PEP, gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB), ICU admission, acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP), sepsis, intubation, and mortality. We matched the groups based on baseline characteristics, co-morbidities, and pertinent medications that increase the risk of kidney injury (including diuretics, ACEi, ARBs, etc.) to rule out potential confounders. Results: A total of 1,490 patients with CKD stages 4 or 5 received NSAIDs and 3,773 patients who did not were identified before propensity score matching, all of whom underwent ERCP. After matching, each group included 1,470 patients with comparable baseline characteristics. There was no significant difference in the incidence of AKI between both groups (13% vs 12%, P = 0.243). However, PEP was less common in the NSAID group (8% vs 10%, P = 0.027). There was no difference in rates of GIB, intubation, sepsis, or mortality. Notably, ANP occurred only in the non-NSAIDs group (0% vs 0.7%, P = 0.002). Conclusion: In patients with advanced CKD (GFR <30) undergoing ERCP, NSAIDs were not linked to higher risks of AKI, GI bleeding, or mortality; they were associated with lower PEP risk. These findings suggest that, with appropriate patient selection, NSAIDs may be safely used in this high risk patient population for single doses.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.