S2213 Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Suturing by Early-Career Gastroenterologists: A Retrospective Analysis

Introduction: Endoscopic suturing is an evolving treatment modality for gastrointestinal (GI) defect closure and stent fixation. While established among experienced endoscopists, limited data exist regarding its use by early-career gastroenterologists. We aimed to evaluate the technical and clinical outcomes, safety, and procedural characteristics of endoscopic suturing performed by early-career gastroenterologists. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of patients undergoing endoscopic suturing by 3 early-career Gastroenterology physicians (≤1.5 years post-fellowship). Data collected included demographics, indication, anatomical site, procedural duration, device used (OverStitch or X-tack), complications, and outcomes. Technical success was evaluated by the proper placement of sutures, while clinical success was studied by the resolution of the specific clinical issue without requiring reintervention in 4 weeks. Procedure time was defined as the duration from the start to the end of anesthesia. Results: Thirty patients (mean age 64.4 ± 13.5 years; 46.7% man) were included. Common indications included fistula closure (36.7%), stent fixation (23.3%), post-polypectomy defect closure (13.3%), perforation management (13.3%), and bleeding control (13.3%). Overall technical success was 96.7% (29/30), and clinical success was 80.0% (24/30). No immediate complications occurred. By anatomical site, clinical success was highest in the colon (100%) and stomach (87.5%), and lowest in the esophagus (62.5%) and small bowel (0%). Clinical success by device was 75.0% for OverStitch and 83.3% for X-tack. Procedural duration averaged 75.2 ± 41.6 minutes. Multivariable regression did not reveal significant predictors of clinical success or shorter procedure time. Conclusion: Endoscopic suturing offers a minimally invasive alternative for patients who would have previously required surgical intervention, thereby reducing the associated morbidity. Adaptation of endoscopic suturing performed by early-career gastroenterologists is safe and effective. These findings support the early training and adoption of suturing techniques for gastroenterology practices.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001136312.57077.5f
Primary Topic
Esophageal and GI Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S2213 Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Suturing by Early-Career Gastroenterologists: A Retrospective Analysis

Sufiyan Kamal, Layth Alzubaidy, Muhammad Majeed
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Esophageal and GI Pathology
article

S2213 Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Suturing by Early-Career Gastroenterologists: A Retrospective Analysis

Sufiyan Kamal, Layth Alzubaidy, Muhammad Majeed
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Endoscopic suturing is an evolving treatment modality for gastrointestinal (GI) defect closure and stent fixation. While established among experienced endoscopists, limited data exist regarding its use by early-career gastroenterologists. We aimed to evaluate the technical and clinical outcomes, safety, and procedural characteristics of endoscopic suturing performed by early-career gastroenterologists. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of patients undergoing endoscopic suturing by 3 early-career Gastroenterology physicians (≤1.5 years post-fellowship). Data collected included demographics, indication, anatomical site, procedural duration, device used (OverStitch or X-tack), complications, and outcomes. Technical success was evaluated by the proper placement of sutures, while clinical success was studied by the resolution of the specific clinical issue without requiring reintervention in 4 weeks. Procedure time was defined as the duration from the start to the end of anesthesia. Results: Thirty patients (mean age 64.4 ± 13.5 years; 46.7% man) were included. Common indications included fistula closure (36.7%), stent fixation (23.3%), post-polypectomy defect closure (13.3%), perforation management (13.3%), and bleeding control (13.3%). Overall technical success was 96.7% (29/30), and clinical success was 80.0% (24/30). No immediate complications occurred. By anatomical site, clinical success was highest in the colon (100%) and stomach (87.5%), and lowest in the esophagus (62.5%) and small bowel (0%). Clinical success by device was 75.0% for OverStitch and 83.3% for X-tack. Procedural duration averaged 75.2 ± 41.6 minutes. Multivariable regression did not reveal significant predictors of clinical success or shorter procedure time. Conclusion: Endoscopic suturing offers a minimally invasive alternative for patients who would have previously required surgical intervention, thereby reducing the associated morbidity. Adaptation of endoscopic suturing performed by early-career gastroenterologists is safe and effective. These findings support the early training and adoption of suturing techniques for gastroenterology practices.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Esophageal and GI Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

S2213 Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Suturing by Early-Career Gastroenterologists: A Retrospective Analysis — Sufiyan Kamal, Layth Alzubaidy, et al. · The American Journal of Gastroenterology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS