S2102 Epidemiology of Diarrheal Infections in Patients With HIV Infection Before and After Gastrointestinal Panel Testing

Introduction: Diarrhea in patients with HIV is associated with increased mortality. Our understanding of diarrheal pathogens has relied on older stool culture and ova and parasite studies, and limited data exist on the epidemiology since the implementation of the gastrointestinal polymerase chain reaction (GI PCR) test. In June 2016, the Weill Cornell Medicine laboratory implemented a GI PCR Panel that tests for the 22 most common pathogens in the United States. This study evaluates the epidemiology of diarrhea among patients with HIV before and after the GI PCR implementation. Methods: This retrospective study from June 1, 2011 to June 1, 2021 included patients 18 years with HIV infection who had at least 1 diarrheal stool test: GI PCR, Clostridioides difficile, stool culture, ova and parasite, Giardia or Cryptosporidium direct fluorescent antibody (DFA), rotavirus antigen, norovirus PCR, and/or stains for Microsporidia. Demographics, HIV parameters, and hospitalization data were collected and summarized with descriptive statistics. Patients were compared by CD4 count using Wilcoxon rank sum, Pearson’s chi-square or Fisher’s exact test. Results: Among 1,830 patients with HIV infection who had stool testing, the average age was 50 years at the time of diarrheal episode and about 80% were men. Thirty-two percent of patients reported their sexual orientation as lesbian or gay. Stool testing was more common inpatient prior to June 2016, and more outpatient after 2016. Before implementation of GI PCR, patients had an average of 1.9 stool tests versus 28.8 tests after. Of 40,682 tests, 1,509 pathogens were detected: 1,042 bacteria, 281 viruses, and 186 parasites. C. difficile, Enteropathogenic and Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli, norovirus, and Shigella were the most common pathogens. After June 2016, patients with CD4 <200 mL were more likely to have norovirus and sapovirus and those with CD4³200 were more likely to have Giardia. Conclusion: The implementation of GI PCR resulted in an increase in diarrheal pathogen detection. Enteropathogenic E. coli was the most common pathogen after 2016 and C. difficile which was the most common pathogen before 2016. Giardia was more commonly identified than Cryptosporidium, which was previously reported as the most common parasitic cause of diarrhea in patients with HIV. Understanding the wide distribution of pathogens is important and can inform empiric treatment in this population.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001135868.43652.f2
Primary Topic
Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S2102 Epidemiology of Diarrheal Infections in Patients With HIV Infection Before and After Gastrointestinal Panel Testing

Carl V. Crawford, Catherine Y. Ng, Michelle E. Lee, Ying Li et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
article

S2102 Epidemiology of Diarrheal Infections in Patients With HIV Infection Before and After Gastrointestinal Panel Testing

Carl V. Crawford, Catherine Y. Ng, Michelle E. Lee, Ying Li, Harjot Singh
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Diarrhea in patients with HIV is associated with increased mortality. Our understanding of diarrheal pathogens has relied on older stool culture and ova and parasite studies, and limited data exist on the epidemiology since the implementation of the gastrointestinal polymerase chain reaction (GI PCR) test. In June 2016, the Weill Cornell Medicine laboratory implemented a GI PCR Panel that tests for the 22 most common pathogens in the United States. This study evaluates the epidemiology of diarrhea among patients with HIV before and after the GI PCR implementation. Methods: This retrospective study from June 1, 2011 to June 1, 2021 included patients 18 years with HIV infection who had at least 1 diarrheal stool test: GI PCR, Clostridioides difficile, stool culture, ova and parasite, Giardia or Cryptosporidium direct fluorescent antibody (DFA), rotavirus antigen, norovirus PCR, and/or stains for Microsporidia. Demographics, HIV parameters, and hospitalization data were collected and summarized with descriptive statistics. Patients were compared by CD4 count using Wilcoxon rank sum, Pearson’s chi-square or Fisher’s exact test. Results: Among 1,830 patients with HIV infection who had stool testing, the average age was 50 years at the time of diarrheal episode and about 80% were men. Thirty-two percent of patients reported their sexual orientation as lesbian or gay. Stool testing was more common inpatient prior to June 2016, and more outpatient after 2016. Before implementation of GI PCR, patients had an average of 1.9 stool tests versus 28.8 tests after. Of 40,682 tests, 1,509 pathogens were detected: 1,042 bacteria, 281 viruses, and 186 parasites. C. difficile, Enteropathogenic and Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli, norovirus, and Shigella were the most common pathogens. After June 2016, patients with CD4 <200 mL were more likely to have norovirus and sapovirus and those with CD4³200 were more likely to have Giardia. Conclusion: The implementation of GI PCR resulted in an increase in diarrheal pathogen detection. Enteropathogenic E. coli was the most common pathogen after 2016 and C. difficile which was the most common pathogen before 2016. Giardia was more commonly identified than Cryptosporidium, which was previously reported as the most common parasitic cause of diarrhea in patients with HIV. Understanding the wide distribution of pathogens is important and can inform empiric treatment in this population.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.