S2022 Trends in the Use and Costs of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Advanced Therapies in the US, 2013-2022

Introduction: Over the past 2 decades, advanced therapies have revolutionized treatment for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Newer drugs are often more expensive than older treatments, raising concerns about affordability to patients and the health care system. This study evaluates trends in the use and cost of advanced therapies as first-line treatments for IBD. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of commercially insured IBD patients from a national claims database (Merative MarketScan) who initiated one of 11 advanced therapies from 2013 to 2022 and had no prior advanced therapy use. We measured trends in the proportion of patients initiating each therapy and estimated net annual treatment costs; for clinician-administered drugs (e.g. infliximab), costs were based on CMS Average Sales Prices, and for pharmacy-administered drugs, costs were estimated as wholesale acquisition costs (i.e., list prices) minus average manufacturer rebates from SSR health. All costs were reported in 2022 dollars. We used logistic regression to assess demographic and clinical characteristics associated with first-line use of ustekinumab and vedolizumab vs TNF-alpha inhibitors. Results: Among 54,269 new users of IBD advanced therapies, the average age was 38 years (SD 16), 51% were women and fewer than 9% had other autoimmune diseases. Fifty-one percent had Crohn’s Disease, 34% had UC, and 16% were unclassified. In 2013, nearly all patients started TNF-alpha inhibitors (infliximab, adalimumab); in 2022, 34% used adalimumab, 27% infliximab, and 38% used newer therapies, including vedolizumab (19%) and ustekinumab (15%). Compared to Crohn’s patients, those with UC were less likely (OR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.31-0.39) to start ustekinumab and more likely to start vedolizumab (OR: 2.15, 95% CI: 2.01-2.30), both compared to starting TNF-alpha inhibitors (Tables 1B-C). From 2013 to 2022, the mean net average annual cost for first-line IBD advanced therapies increased by 36%, from $33,699 to $45,703. Conclusion: Costs for advanced therapies rose by 36% from 2013 to 2022, driven by price increases for some TNF-alpha inhibitors and greater use of new, more expensive agents. Understanding these trends can help clinicians engage in value-conscious prescribing, especially when therapeutic alternatives exist. While patient assistance programs reduce out-of-pocket costs for some patients, the burden to the healthcare system remains substantial—highlighting the need for more cost-transparent, evidence-aligned treatment strategies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001135548.18840.02
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S2022 Trends in the Use and Costs of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Advanced Therapies in the US, 2013-2022

Pranay Nadella, Jessica Ravikoff Allegretti, Mike Z. Zhai, Benjamin N. Rome
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
article

S2022 Trends in the Use and Costs of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Advanced Therapies in the US, 2013-2022

Pranay Nadella, Jessica Ravikoff Allegretti, Mike Z. Zhai, Benjamin N. Rome
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Over the past 2 decades, advanced therapies have revolutionized treatment for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Newer drugs are often more expensive than older treatments, raising concerns about affordability to patients and the health care system. This study evaluates trends in the use and cost of advanced therapies as first-line treatments for IBD. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of commercially insured IBD patients from a national claims database (Merative MarketScan) who initiated one of 11 advanced therapies from 2013 to 2022 and had no prior advanced therapy use. We measured trends in the proportion of patients initiating each therapy and estimated net annual treatment costs; for clinician-administered drugs (e.g. infliximab), costs were based on CMS Average Sales Prices, and for pharmacy-administered drugs, costs were estimated as wholesale acquisition costs (i.e., list prices) minus average manufacturer rebates from SSR health. All costs were reported in 2022 dollars. We used logistic regression to assess demographic and clinical characteristics associated with first-line use of ustekinumab and vedolizumab vs TNF-alpha inhibitors. Results: Among 54,269 new users of IBD advanced therapies, the average age was 38 years (SD 16), 51% were women and fewer than 9% had other autoimmune diseases. Fifty-one percent had Crohn’s Disease, 34% had UC, and 16% were unclassified. In 2013, nearly all patients started TNF-alpha inhibitors (infliximab, adalimumab); in 2022, 34% used adalimumab, 27% infliximab, and 38% used newer therapies, including vedolizumab (19%) and ustekinumab (15%). Compared to Crohn’s patients, those with UC were less likely (OR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.31-0.39) to start ustekinumab and more likely to start vedolizumab (OR: 2.15, 95% CI: 2.01-2.30), both compared to starting TNF-alpha inhibitors (Tables 1B-C). From 2013 to 2022, the mean net average annual cost for first-line IBD advanced therapies increased by 36%, from $33,699 to $45,703. Conclusion: Costs for advanced therapies rose by 36% from 2013 to 2022, driven by price increases for some TNF-alpha inhibitors and greater use of new, more expensive agents. Understanding these trends can help clinicians engage in value-conscious prescribing, especially when therapeutic alternatives exist. While patient assistance programs reduce out-of-pocket costs for some patients, the burden to the healthcare system remains substantial—highlighting the need for more cost-transparent, evidence-aligned treatment strategies.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.