S2023 Impact of Brief COVID-19 Pandemic-Associated Endoscopy Delays on Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Introduction: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic led to widespread delays in non-urgent endoscopic procedures, raising concerns about potential adverse outcomes in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, emerging evidence suggests that such delays may not uniformly result in worse clinical outcomes. For instance, a study by Patel et al. found no significant difference in adverse events between patients with delayed and on-time endoscopies, and even observed higher rates of hospitalizations and surgeries in the on-time group, possibly reflecting more severe disease or increased healthcare engagement. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study on patients with Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis who underwent endoscopy at a tertiary care center in the U.S. between March 1, 2020, and August 31, 2020. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on whether their procedures were delayed. We evaluated adverse outcomes including emergency visits, hospitalizations, surgeries, and medication escalation. Covariates were assessed using logistic regression models. Procedural volume trends during the pandemic and post-pandemic periods were also analyzed. Results: No statistically significant association was observed between endoscopy delay and adverse IBD-related outcomes (OR 2.24, 95% CI 0.69–7.85; P = 0.18). Similarly, age, sex, disease subtype, and RUCA classification were not significantly associated with adverse outcomes or with the likelihood of procedural delay. Endoscopic procedure volume was markedly reduced during the pandemic (n = 73) compared to the post-pandemic period (n = 625), reflecting operational disruption. Unadjusted frequencies showed a numerically higher proportion of adverse events in patients with delayed procedures, but this difference did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion: In this single-center retrospective analysis, delays in endoscopy during the COVID-19 pandemic were not significantly associated with adverse clinical outcomes in patients with IBD. These findings align with recent literature suggesting that, in certain contexts, endoscopy delays did not lead to worse outcomes. However, the observed trends underscore the need for continued evaluation of procedural triaging during system-wide disruptions and support efforts to maintain timely access to endoscopic care.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001135552.80998.2d
Primary Topic
COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S2023 Impact of Brief COVID-19 Pandemic-Associated Endoscopy Delays on Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Mohammad Alfrad Nobel Bhuiyan, Sudha Pandit, Daniyal Raza, Farhan Mohiuddin et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
article

S2023 Impact of Brief COVID-19 Pandemic-Associated Endoscopy Delays on Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Mohammad Alfrad Nobel Bhuiyan, Sudha Pandit, Daniyal Raza, Farhan Mohiuddin, Karim Khan
article en

Abstract

Introduction: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic led to widespread delays in non-urgent endoscopic procedures, raising concerns about potential adverse outcomes in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, emerging evidence suggests that such delays may not uniformly result in worse clinical outcomes. For instance, a study by Patel et al. found no significant difference in adverse events between patients with delayed and on-time endoscopies, and even observed higher rates of hospitalizations and surgeries in the on-time group, possibly reflecting more severe disease or increased healthcare engagement. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study on patients with Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis who underwent endoscopy at a tertiary care center in the U.S. between March 1, 2020, and August 31, 2020. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on whether their procedures were delayed. We evaluated adverse outcomes including emergency visits, hospitalizations, surgeries, and medication escalation. Covariates were assessed using logistic regression models. Procedural volume trends during the pandemic and post-pandemic periods were also analyzed. Results: No statistically significant association was observed between endoscopy delay and adverse IBD-related outcomes (OR 2.24, 95% CI 0.69–7.85; P = 0.18). Similarly, age, sex, disease subtype, and RUCA classification were not significantly associated with adverse outcomes or with the likelihood of procedural delay. Endoscopic procedure volume was markedly reduced during the pandemic (n = 73) compared to the post-pandemic period (n = 625), reflecting operational disruption. Unadjusted frequencies showed a numerically higher proportion of adverse events in patients with delayed procedures, but this difference did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion: In this single-center retrospective analysis, delays in endoscopy during the COVID-19 pandemic were not significantly associated with adverse clinical outcomes in patients with IBD. These findings align with recent literature suggesting that, in certain contexts, endoscopy delays did not lead to worse outcomes. However, the observed trends underscore the need for continued evaluation of procedural triaging during system-wide disruptions and support efforts to maintain timely access to endoscopic care.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.