S2046 Fidaxomicin Treatment for Clostridioides difficile Infection in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at increased risk for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), which can worsen outcomes and complicate management. Fidaxomicin is recommended for CDI, but its use in patients with IBD has not been well studied. This study summarizes available evidence on its effectiveness and safety in this population. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science (through May 2025), and grey literature from Digestive Disease Week, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and American College of Gastroenterology identified retrospective cohort studies reporting fidaxomicin outcomes in patients with IBD. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed study quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Pooled estimates were generated via random-effects models; heterogeneity was assessed with Cochran’s Q and I². Results: Five studies met inclusion criteria, comprising a total of 4,205 patients with IBD and CDI treated with fidaxomicin. Meta-analysis showed a pooled CDI recurrence of 10.97% (95% CI: 9.32–12.73%), mortality of 6.68% (95% CI: 1.81–13.96%), and colectomy rate of 1.57% (95% CI: 1.17–2.02%). Comparative analysis found no significant differences between fidaxomicin and vancomycin in recurrence, mortality, or colectomy. Initial cure rates ranged from 60.5% to 81.8%, and sustained response at 12 weeks reached up to 82.3%. First-episode CDI cases showed lower recurrence (4% vs 16%; P = .06) and higher sustained response (91% vs 75%; P = .04) than recurrent cases. Patients achieving sustained CDI response were less likely to require escalation of IBD therapy (12% vs 20%; P = .42). Colectomy occurred in up to 5% of UC patients, usually due to refractory disease rather than CDI. Two studies comparing fidaxomicin to vancomycin showed mixed recurrence results. Fidaxomicin was well tolerated, with only mild, non-limiting adverse events. Conclusion: Fidaxomicin is a highly favorable treatment option for CDI in patients with IBD, particularly for first-episode cases. It may reduce recurrence and support disease stability, with minimal adverse events or colectomy risk. Current guidelines often extrapolate CDI data from the general population, with limited IBD-specific evidence. This is the first meta-analysis to synthesize fidaxomicin outcomes in IBD. Although one study suggested a lower need for escalation of IBD therapy with fidaxomicin, this outcome was not consistently evaluated across studies. Further prospective studies are needed to guide treatment in this high-risk group.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001135644.65726.f4
Primary Topic
Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S2046 Fidaxomicin Treatment for Clostridioides difficile Infection in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Mirian Ramirez Rojas, Renato Beas, Fortunato S. Príncipe-Meneses, Daniel Guifarro et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
article

S2046 Fidaxomicin Treatment for Clostridioides difficile Infection in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Mirian Ramirez Rojas, Renato Beas, Fortunato S. Príncipe-Meneses, Daniel Guifarro, Leandro Sierra, Samreen Jawaid, Dalton A. Norwood, Ambar Godoy, Eleazar E. Montalvan-Sanchez
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at increased risk for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), which can worsen outcomes and complicate management. Fidaxomicin is recommended for CDI, but its use in patients with IBD has not been well studied. This study summarizes available evidence on its effectiveness and safety in this population. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science (through May 2025), and grey literature from Digestive Disease Week, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and American College of Gastroenterology identified retrospective cohort studies reporting fidaxomicin outcomes in patients with IBD. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed study quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Pooled estimates were generated via random-effects models; heterogeneity was assessed with Cochran’s Q and I². Results: Five studies met inclusion criteria, comprising a total of 4,205 patients with IBD and CDI treated with fidaxomicin. Meta-analysis showed a pooled CDI recurrence of 10.97% (95% CI: 9.32–12.73%), mortality of 6.68% (95% CI: 1.81–13.96%), and colectomy rate of 1.57% (95% CI: 1.17–2.02%). Comparative analysis found no significant differences between fidaxomicin and vancomycin in recurrence, mortality, or colectomy. Initial cure rates ranged from 60.5% to 81.8%, and sustained response at 12 weeks reached up to 82.3%. First-episode CDI cases showed lower recurrence (4% vs 16%; P = .06) and higher sustained response (91% vs 75%; P = .04) than recurrent cases. Patients achieving sustained CDI response were less likely to require escalation of IBD therapy (12% vs 20%; P = .42). Colectomy occurred in up to 5% of UC patients, usually due to refractory disease rather than CDI. Two studies comparing fidaxomicin to vancomycin showed mixed recurrence results. Fidaxomicin was well tolerated, with only mild, non-limiting adverse events. Conclusion: Fidaxomicin is a highly favorable treatment option for CDI in patients with IBD, particularly for first-episode cases. It may reduce recurrence and support disease stability, with minimal adverse events or colectomy risk. Current guidelines often extrapolate CDI data from the general population, with limited IBD-specific evidence. This is the first meta-analysis to synthesize fidaxomicin outcomes in IBD. Although one study suggested a lower need for escalation of IBD therapy with fidaxomicin, this outcome was not consistently evaluated across studies. Further prospective studies are needed to guide treatment in this high-risk group.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.