S2037 Guselkumab Is Efficacious and Safe for Moderately-to-Severe Active Ulcerative Colitis: Real-World Data From a Large Tertiary Center

Introduction: Guselkumab (GUS) is an IgG1 inhibitor that binds to and inhibits the p19 subunit of interleukin-23, a recognized cytokine involved in the inflammatory processes of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). GUS has been shown to effectively induce and maintain remission in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). We present real-world efficacy and safety of GUS in UC in a large tertiary IBD center. Methods: All patients prescribed GUS at our center were prospectively monitored. Patients were contacted at weeks 0, 2, 4, 8, and 12. Data regarding disease activity (using the Simple Clinical Colitis Index (SCCAI)), steroid usage, and adverse events were collected, and blood tests were also collected at weeks 0, 4,8, and 12. Data on patients observed up to at least week 8 were collected and analyzed. All patients were evaluated for safety outcomes, and patients with UC were assessed for efficacy. Results: There were 27 patients in the cohort at the time of this analysis (UC: 23, pouchitis: 3, IBD-U: 1; mean age 40.9 ± 13.9, 55.6% women. At week 8, a total of 26 (96%) patients continued using GUS. Among the 19 patients who reached week 12, 16 (84%) maintained their regimen of GUS. Median SCCAI score decreased from 3.5 (interquartile range [IQR] 1-5) at week 0 to 1 (IQR 0-2) at week 8 and 0 at week 12 (IQR 0-1). At week 0, 38.1% were in clinical remission (SCCAI ≤2). By week 8, 75% of patients were in clinical remission, and 92.9% were in remission at week 12. Remission rates were similar in patients who were ustekinumab (UST) naïve and exposed. At the commencement of treatment, 36.4% of the patients received steroid therapy. This proportion decreased to 12% by week 8 and 12.5% by week 12. Steroid-free clinical remission was 24% at week 0, 52.2% at week 8, and 66.7% at week 12. In univariate analysis, age, sex, and prior therapy involving tumor necrosis factor inhibitors or ustekinumab were not associated with steroid-free remission at weeks 8 or 12. Thirty percent had undetectable CRP levels at baseline, compared to 52% at week 8. Median fecal calprotectin dropped from 1089 at baseline to 299 at week 8. There were no significant treatment-related adverse events. Conclusion: In the first real-world analysis of GUS in patients with moderately to severely active UC, GUS demonstrated significant effectiveness and safety, even among prior UST-exposed patients.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001135608.54119.0d
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S2037 Guselkumab Is Efficacious and Safe for Moderately-to-Severe Active Ulcerative Colitis: Real-World Data From a Large Tertiary Center

Asher Shafrir, Russell D. Cohen, David Choi, Alex Mathew et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
article

S2037 Guselkumab Is Efficacious and Safe for Moderately-to-Severe Active Ulcerative Colitis: Real-World Data From a Large Tertiary Center

Asher Shafrir, Russell D. Cohen, David Choi, Alex Mathew, David T. Rubin, Russell Yanofsky, Jessica Tanouye, Alexandra R. Hannett
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Guselkumab (GUS) is an IgG1 inhibitor that binds to and inhibits the p19 subunit of interleukin-23, a recognized cytokine involved in the inflammatory processes of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). GUS has been shown to effectively induce and maintain remission in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). We present real-world efficacy and safety of GUS in UC in a large tertiary IBD center. Methods: All patients prescribed GUS at our center were prospectively monitored. Patients were contacted at weeks 0, 2, 4, 8, and 12. Data regarding disease activity (using the Simple Clinical Colitis Index (SCCAI)), steroid usage, and adverse events were collected, and blood tests were also collected at weeks 0, 4,8, and 12. Data on patients observed up to at least week 8 were collected and analyzed. All patients were evaluated for safety outcomes, and patients with UC were assessed for efficacy. Results: There were 27 patients in the cohort at the time of this analysis (UC: 23, pouchitis: 3, IBD-U: 1; mean age 40.9 ± 13.9, 55.6% women. At week 8, a total of 26 (96%) patients continued using GUS. Among the 19 patients who reached week 12, 16 (84%) maintained their regimen of GUS. Median SCCAI score decreased from 3.5 (interquartile range [IQR] 1-5) at week 0 to 1 (IQR 0-2) at week 8 and 0 at week 12 (IQR 0-1). At week 0, 38.1% were in clinical remission (SCCAI ≤2). By week 8, 75% of patients were in clinical remission, and 92.9% were in remission at week 12. Remission rates were similar in patients who were ustekinumab (UST) naïve and exposed. At the commencement of treatment, 36.4% of the patients received steroid therapy. This proportion decreased to 12% by week 8 and 12.5% by week 12. Steroid-free clinical remission was 24% at week 0, 52.2% at week 8, and 66.7% at week 12. In univariate analysis, age, sex, and prior therapy involving tumor necrosis factor inhibitors or ustekinumab were not associated with steroid-free remission at weeks 8 or 12. Thirty percent had undetectable CRP levels at baseline, compared to 52% at week 8. Median fecal calprotectin dropped from 1089 at baseline to 299 at week 8. There were no significant treatment-related adverse events. Conclusion: In the first real-world analysis of GUS in patients with moderately to severely active UC, GUS demonstrated significant effectiveness and safety, even among prior UST-exposed patients.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.