S2059 A GBD-Based Comparative Analysis of Gastrointestinal Parasitic Burden in Conflict-Affected Nations and its Clinical Relevance for US Gastroenterologists

Introduction: Gastrointestinal (GI) parasitic infections are often considered diseases of low-income countries, yet rising global migration has made them increasingly relevant to clinical practice in the United States. Refugees and asylum seekers from conflict-affected regions frequently present to U.S. hospitals with underdiagnosed parasitic infections, often mimicking common GI disorders. This study leverages the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2023 dataset to quantify global disparities in parasitic burden using a novel epidemiologic metric—the Burden Disparity Index (BDI)—and explores its implications for U.S.-based gastroenterologists. Methods: Age-standardized rates of intestinal nematode infections were extracted for the years 1990–2023 from the GBD 2023 database. Countries were categorized into 2 cohorts: 12 conflict-affected nations (e.g., Syria, Yemen, Myanmar) and 12 stable, geographically adjacent neighbors (e.g., Jordan, Oman, Bangladesh). BDI was calculated annually as the ratio of average disease burden in conflict-affected countries relative to stable counterparts. Trends over time were visualized and analyzed. Results: In 1990, conflict-affected nations had a parasitic burden rate 1.2 times higher than stable neighbors. By 2023, this disparity had nearly doubled, with a BDI of 2.2, indicating significantly worsening inequity. Stable countries achieved a 54% reduction in burden over the 30-year span, while conflict regions saw only a 12% decline. The most pronounced divergence occurred after 2010, corresponding with increasing geopolitical instability, disrupted healthcare access, and large-scale displacement. Conclusion: This growing disparity holds direct consequences for gastroenterologists in the United States. Many patients from high-burden regions are now seen in U.S. practices, often with non-specific GI symptoms such as bloating, abdominal pain, chronic diarrhea, or eosinophilia. These presentations can mimic or be misdiagnosed as irritable bowel syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease, or eosinophilic gastroenteritis. However, routine screening for GI parasites is often overlooked in adult patients. By highlighting global disease trends, the BDI emphasizes the need for clinical vigilance, targeted screening, and updated diagnostic protocols in diverse patient populations. Integrating global burden awareness into domestic GI practice is no longer optional—it is essential.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001135696.19024.c6
Primary Topic
Parasites and Host Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S2059 A GBD-Based Comparative Analysis of Gastrointestinal Parasitic Burden in Conflict-Affected Nations and its Clinical Relevance for US Gastroenterologists

Sweta Sahu, Dushyant Singh Dahiya, Salma Younas, Sadaf Iftikhar et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Parasites and Host Interactions
article

S2059 A GBD-Based Comparative Analysis of Gastrointestinal Parasitic Burden in Conflict-Affected Nations and its Clinical Relevance for US Gastroenterologists

Sweta Sahu, Dushyant Singh Dahiya, Salma Younas, Sadaf Iftikhar, Mohammed Saifuddin
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Gastrointestinal (GI) parasitic infections are often considered diseases of low-income countries, yet rising global migration has made them increasingly relevant to clinical practice in the United States. Refugees and asylum seekers from conflict-affected regions frequently present to U.S. hospitals with underdiagnosed parasitic infections, often mimicking common GI disorders. This study leverages the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2023 dataset to quantify global disparities in parasitic burden using a novel epidemiologic metric—the Burden Disparity Index (BDI)—and explores its implications for U.S.-based gastroenterologists. Methods: Age-standardized rates of intestinal nematode infections were extracted for the years 1990–2023 from the GBD 2023 database. Countries were categorized into 2 cohorts: 12 conflict-affected nations (e.g., Syria, Yemen, Myanmar) and 12 stable, geographically adjacent neighbors (e.g., Jordan, Oman, Bangladesh). BDI was calculated annually as the ratio of average disease burden in conflict-affected countries relative to stable counterparts. Trends over time were visualized and analyzed. Results: In 1990, conflict-affected nations had a parasitic burden rate 1.2 times higher than stable neighbors. By 2023, this disparity had nearly doubled, with a BDI of 2.2, indicating significantly worsening inequity. Stable countries achieved a 54% reduction in burden over the 30-year span, while conflict regions saw only a 12% decline. The most pronounced divergence occurred after 2010, corresponding with increasing geopolitical instability, disrupted healthcare access, and large-scale displacement. Conclusion: This growing disparity holds direct consequences for gastroenterologists in the United States. Many patients from high-burden regions are now seen in U.S. practices, often with non-specific GI symptoms such as bloating, abdominal pain, chronic diarrhea, or eosinophilia. These presentations can mimic or be misdiagnosed as irritable bowel syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease, or eosinophilic gastroenteritis. However, routine screening for GI parasites is often overlooked in adult patients. By highlighting global disease trends, the BDI emphasizes the need for clinical vigilance, targeted screening, and updated diagnostic protocols in diverse patient populations. Integrating global burden awareness into domestic GI practice is no longer optional—it is essential.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Parasites and Host Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.