S5325 A Rare Case of Duodenal Perforation After ERCP: Recognizing and Managing Biliary Stent-Related Injury

Introduction: Duodenal perforation is a rare but potentially fatal complication of biliary stenting during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). We present a case of dual perforation within 12 hours of insertion, managed non-surgically. Case Description: An 80-year-old woman with no significant medical history presented to the emergency department (ED) with worsening right-sided abdominal pain radiating to the back. She had undergone ERCP the day prior for evaluation of biliary ductal dilation, which revealed severe common hepatic duct stricture and mild common bile duct narrowing concerning for cholangiocarcinoma. Two plastic biliary stents were placed, and cytology samples were obtained through brushings. Within 12 hours of discharge, she returned to the ED in a nauseated state with severe abdominal pain. Labs showed leukocytosis (white blood cell count 14.5 × 10⁹/L). Non-contrast computed tomography (CT) abdomen revealed retroperitoneal free air and inflammatory stranding with fluid in the right abdomen, and the stents abutting the duodenum—raising concern for duodenal perforation. She was made NPO and started on intravenous fluids, proton pump inhibitors, and piperacillin-tazobactam. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) revealed 2 plastic biliary stents with their distal tips embedded in the opposing wall of the second portion of the duodenum. The stents were removed through the scope, after which 2 punctate, non-bleeding duodenal perforations became clearly visible. Endoscopic closure was successfully performed using eight MANTIS clips—3 at one site and 5 at the other. A nasoenteric tube was placed, and CT-guided drainage of a right lower quadrant fluid collection was performed, with placement of a 10 Fr pigtail catheter. The patient gradually improved with resolution of pain and leukocytosis after endoscopic closure and drainage. Discussion: Duodenal perforation occurs in less than 1% of ERCP procedures. Stent-induced perforation is even rarer, and dual perforations are exceptional. Our patient presented within 12 hours of ERCP with severe abdominal pain, prompting imaging. Due to early identification, hemodynamic stability, and absence of diffuse peritonitis, surgical intervention was deferred. Both perforations were managed endoscopically with clip closure after stent removal. She improved rapidly, and follow-up imaging showed no residual collection or leak. This case underscores the importance of early recognition and demonstrates that endoscopic closure can be a safe, minimally invasive alternative to surgery.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001148760.83025.50
Primary Topic
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S5325 A Rare Case of Duodenal Perforation After ERCP: Recognizing and Managing Biliary Stent-Related Injury

Stephanie J. Melquist, Sandra Chehayeb, William J. Salyers, Hasan Jaber
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
article

S5325 A Rare Case of Duodenal Perforation After ERCP: Recognizing and Managing Biliary Stent-Related Injury

Stephanie J. Melquist, Sandra Chehayeb, William J. Salyers, Hasan Jaber
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Duodenal perforation is a rare but potentially fatal complication of biliary stenting during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). We present a case of dual perforation within 12 hours of insertion, managed non-surgically. Case Description: An 80-year-old woman with no significant medical history presented to the emergency department (ED) with worsening right-sided abdominal pain radiating to the back. She had undergone ERCP the day prior for evaluation of biliary ductal dilation, which revealed severe common hepatic duct stricture and mild common bile duct narrowing concerning for cholangiocarcinoma. Two plastic biliary stents were placed, and cytology samples were obtained through brushings. Within 12 hours of discharge, she returned to the ED in a nauseated state with severe abdominal pain. Labs showed leukocytosis (white blood cell count 14.5 × 10⁹/L). Non-contrast computed tomography (CT) abdomen revealed retroperitoneal free air and inflammatory stranding with fluid in the right abdomen, and the stents abutting the duodenum—raising concern for duodenal perforation. She was made NPO and started on intravenous fluids, proton pump inhibitors, and piperacillin-tazobactam. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) revealed 2 plastic biliary stents with their distal tips embedded in the opposing wall of the second portion of the duodenum. The stents were removed through the scope, after which 2 punctate, non-bleeding duodenal perforations became clearly visible. Endoscopic closure was successfully performed using eight MANTIS clips—3 at one site and 5 at the other. A nasoenteric tube was placed, and CT-guided drainage of a right lower quadrant fluid collection was performed, with placement of a 10 Fr pigtail catheter. The patient gradually improved with resolution of pain and leukocytosis after endoscopic closure and drainage. Discussion: Duodenal perforation occurs in less than 1% of ERCP procedures. Stent-induced perforation is even rarer, and dual perforations are exceptional. Our patient presented within 12 hours of ERCP with severe abdominal pain, prompting imaging. Due to early identification, hemodynamic stability, and absence of diffuse peritonitis, surgical intervention was deferred. Both perforations were managed endoscopically with clip closure after stent removal. She improved rapidly, and follow-up imaging showed no residual collection or leak. This case underscores the importance of early recognition and demonstrates that endoscopic closure can be a safe, minimally invasive alternative to surgery.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.