S5186 When Suspicion Outpaces Confirmation: A Case of Suspected Invasive Entamoeba Histolytica

Introduction: Entamoeba histolytica is a protozoan parasite notable for causing amebiasis. The global prevalence is about 1%, with the highest burden in regions with poor sanitation. Most cases are subclinical, but around 10% progress to invasive E. histolytica, leading to amoebic colitis and liver abscess. Risk groups include migrants from endemic areas, long-term travelers and immunocompromised individuals. This case presents a suspected invasive E. histolytica infection in a patient with intermittent fevers and no significant risk factors. Case Description/Methods: We describe a 56-year-old man with hypertension, presenting with intermittent fevers for 5 days and 1 episode of diarrhea. Imaging showed asymmetric wall thickening in the cecum, hepatic lesions, and an enhancing right mesentery lymph node. Given concerns for malignancy, general surgery was consulted who requested gastroenterology’s input prior to surgical intervention. Colonoscopy revealed large patchy ulceration in the cecum and smaller ulcerations in the ascending colon. Biopsies showed ulcerated mucosa with acute inflammation and reactive epithelial changes, negative for dysplasia or malignancy. Infectious disease was consulted, and the workup—including blood cultures, ova and parasite, cryptosporidium antigen, giardia antigen, and E. histolytica antigen—was negative. However, E. histolytica antibody was elevated. The patient underwent IR-guided drainage of liver lesions, yielding 120 ml of “chocolate” fluid which cultured rare gram-negative bacilli. He was started on flagyl and ceftriaxone, and a PICC line was placed for prolonged antibiotic treatment. He was discharged for outpatient follow-up with infectious disease. Discussion: This report underscores the need to consider E. histolytica in the differential diagnosis, particularly in patients with atypical presentations, no clear risk factors, or inconclusive test results. E. histolytica antigen is often negative in extraintestinal disease despite colonic involvement, as fewer trophozoites are shed into the colon as the infection progresses to the liver, lowering antigen sensitivity. Even in low-prevalence areas like the U.S., a broad differential is crucial in patients with intermittent fevers and liver lesions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001148204.78038.c9
Primary Topic
Amoebic Infections and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S5186 When Suspicion Outpaces Confirmation: A Case of Suspected Invasive Entamoeba Histolytica

Juan Martino, Seth Tatel, Arvin Razmdideh
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Amoebic Infections and Treatments
article

S5186 When Suspicion Outpaces Confirmation: A Case of Suspected Invasive Entamoeba Histolytica

Juan Martino, Seth Tatel, Arvin Razmdideh
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Entamoeba histolytica is a protozoan parasite notable for causing amebiasis. The global prevalence is about 1%, with the highest burden in regions with poor sanitation. Most cases are subclinical, but around 10% progress to invasive E. histolytica, leading to amoebic colitis and liver abscess. Risk groups include migrants from endemic areas, long-term travelers and immunocompromised individuals. This case presents a suspected invasive E. histolytica infection in a patient with intermittent fevers and no significant risk factors. Case Description/Methods: We describe a 56-year-old man with hypertension, presenting with intermittent fevers for 5 days and 1 episode of diarrhea. Imaging showed asymmetric wall thickening in the cecum, hepatic lesions, and an enhancing right mesentery lymph node. Given concerns for malignancy, general surgery was consulted who requested gastroenterology’s input prior to surgical intervention. Colonoscopy revealed large patchy ulceration in the cecum and smaller ulcerations in the ascending colon. Biopsies showed ulcerated mucosa with acute inflammation and reactive epithelial changes, negative for dysplasia or malignancy. Infectious disease was consulted, and the workup—including blood cultures, ova and parasite, cryptosporidium antigen, giardia antigen, and E. histolytica antigen—was negative. However, E. histolytica antibody was elevated. The patient underwent IR-guided drainage of liver lesions, yielding 120 ml of “chocolate” fluid which cultured rare gram-negative bacilli. He was started on flagyl and ceftriaxone, and a PICC line was placed for prolonged antibiotic treatment. He was discharged for outpatient follow-up with infectious disease. Discussion: This report underscores the need to consider E. histolytica in the differential diagnosis, particularly in patients with atypical presentations, no clear risk factors, or inconclusive test results. E. histolytica antigen is often negative in extraintestinal disease despite colonic involvement, as fewer trophozoites are shed into the colon as the infection progresses to the liver, lowering antigen sensitivity. Even in low-prevalence areas like the U.S., a broad differential is crucial in patients with intermittent fevers and liver lesions.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Amoebic Infections and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.